JBC, Vol. 250, Issue 19, 7771-7779, Oct, 1975
Protease II from Escherichia coli. Purification and characterization
M. Pacaud and C. Richaud
We have previously demonstrated the existence of two types of endopeptidase
in Escherichia coli. A purification procedure is described for one of
these, designated protease II. It has been purified about 13,500-fold with
a recovery of 24%. The isolated enzyme appears homogeneous by
electrophoresis and gel filtration. Its molecular weight is estimated by
three different methods to be about 58,000. Its optimal pH is around 8.
Protease II activity is unaffected by chelating agents and sulfhydryl
reagents. Amidase and proteolytic activities are stimulated by calcium ion,
which decreases the enzyme stability. Like pancreatic trypsin, this
endopeptidase catalyses the hydrolysis of alpha-amino-substituted lysine
and arginine esters. It appears distinct from the previously isolated
protease I, which is a chymotrypsin-like enzyme. The apparent Michaelis
constant for hydrolysis of N-benzoyl-L-arginine ethyl ester is 4.7 X 10(-4)
M. The esterase activity is inhibited by diisopryopylphosphorofluoridate
(Ki(app) equals 2.7 X 10(-3) M) and tosyl lysine chloromethyl ketone
(Ki(app) equals 1.8 X 10(-5) M), indicating that serine and histidine
residues may be present in the active site. However, protease II is
insensitive to phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride and several natural trypsin
inhibitors. Its amidase and esterase activities are competitively inhibited
by free arginine and aromatic amidines. The proteolytic activity measured
on axocasein is very low. In contrast to trypsin, protease II is without
effect on native beta-galactosidase. It easily degrades aspartokinase I and
III. Nevertheless both enzymes are resistant to proteolysis in the presence
of their respective allosteric effectors. These results provide further
evidence that such differences in protease susceptibility can be related to
the conformational state of the substrate. The possible implication of
structural changes in the mechanism of preferential proteolysis in vivo, is
discussed.