JBC Origene Your Gene Company

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Counillon, L.
Right arrow Articles by Pouysségur, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Counillon, L.
Right arrow Articles by Pouysségur, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 1, 1-4, January 7, 2000

MINIREVIEW
The Expanding Family of Eucaryotic Na+/H+ Exchangers*

Laurent CounillonDagger and Jacques Pouysségur§

From the Dagger  Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire et Moléculaire, CNRS UMR 6548 and § Institute of Signaling, Developmental Biology and Cancer Research, CNRS UMR 6543 Centre A. Lacassagne, 33 Av. de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
INTRODUCTION
Structural and Functional...
Biochemical Features of Na+/H+...
Physiological Roles and...
Concluding Remarks
REFERENCES

Maintaining intracellular pH values close to neutrality is a crucial task for a wide variety of cells. Hence, various mechanisms for pH regulation have been selected early in evolution and are ubiquitously distributed. Among the actors in this scene, the members of the Na+/H+ exchanger gene family (NHE1 isoforms) are widely expressed and constitute extremely efficient systems for protecting cells against internal acidification. To date, at least six genes have been identified in mammalian cells, and to various extents, the corresponding proteins have been molecularly and functionally characterized. In this short review, we will update our current knowledge on these NHE family members and highlight the most important aspects of the basic function of these transporters. Then, in a broader physiological context, we will present what we think are the most prominent specific features of the different NHE isoforms.

    Structural and Functional Domains of NHEs
TOP
INTRODUCTION
Structural and Functional...
Biochemical Features of Na+/H+...
Physiological Roles and...
Concluding Remarks
REFERENCES

The first cDNA encoding the NHE-1 isoform was cloned using an expression strategy based on the ability of Na+/H+ exchangers to protect antiporter-deficient cells (1) against otherwise lethal intracellular acidification (2). Variations in the hormonal regulation and pharmacological features of Na+/H+ exchange were the first indications that a large family of Na+/H+ exchange molecules existed (3). Therefore, using the NHE-1 cDNA as a probe led to the molecular identification of the NHE-2, -3, and -4 (4-7) isoforms. In addition, non-epithelial isoforms such as NHE-5 (8-10) and NHE-6 have been cloned recently. By contrast to the other Na+/H+ exchangers, NHE-6 is not expressed at the plasma membrane but in the mitochondria (11).

Topological Features and Sequence Conservation-- The highly hydrophobic N-terminal region of the protein is predicted to span the membrane 10-12 times depending on the algorithm used to calculate the hydropathy plot of the protein. In particular, the region situated in the central part of the transmembrane domain (residues 226-281 in the human NHE-1) is quite hydrophobic but contains several negatively charged residues. By contrast the C-terminal region of the Na+/H+ exchangers is hydrophilic and has been shown to be located in the cell cytoplasm, at least for the NHE-1 isoform (12, 13). Interestingly, recent experiments on the NHE-3 isoform seem to indicate that epitopes within the C-terminal region of this protein are extracellularly exposed (14). For NHE-1 and -2, the loop between the putative transmembrane segments 1 and 2 is glycosylated and therefore extracellular (15, 16). Methods such as scanning N-glycosylation mutagenesis (17) will be necessary to gain further topological information.

Sequence Comparison between NHE Isoforms-- The transmembrane domain exhibits from 45 to 65% amino acid identity, although this score drops to about 25-35% for the cytoplasmic domain. A more detailed analysis of the sequence homology clusters reveals the presence of two subfamilies of isoforms that have probably diverged later in evolution: NHE-2 and -4 as well as NHE-3 and -5. The central part of the domain (putative transmembrane segments 5a and 5b between residues 226 and 281 in human NHE-1) is nearly identical between all the NHE isoforms. This part of the polypeptide possesses negatively charged residues (aspartates 226, 238, and 267 and glutamates 247, 248, 253, and 262 in the human NHE-1) included in a highly hydrophobic stretch of sequence, and the substitution of Glu-262 in the NHE-1 isoform results in the inactivation of the transporter (18). Although it is not possible to rule out an indirect effect of this mutation, this result in association with the extreme sequence conservation of this region among the NHE members strongly suggests that these two transmembrane segments of the exchangers constitute the catalytic core of the Na+/H+ exchangers.

By contrast, the first putative transmembrane segment of the Na+/H+ exchangers and the first extracellular loop are not well conserved in the NHE family. These N-terminal sequences are divergent even in the same isoform cloned from various mammalian species (19), indicating that sequence conservation in the first extracellular loop is not crucial for the function of the protein. A closer analysis of the first stretch of hydrophobic residues using the von Heijne rules (20, 21) reveals that this first putative transmembrane segment has the features of a signal peptide, including a positively charged N-terminal end and a relatively short hydrophobic stretch.

Although the cytosolic domain sequence seems to be more poorly conserved, alignment methods based on the presence of hydrophobic secondary structures (hydrophobic score analysis) (22, 23) show that these C-terminal domains clearly exhibit structural similarities.2 Recently, circular dichroism measurements performed on the Escherichia coli-expressed NHE-1 C-terminal region confirmed that this part of the protein possesses a high degree of structural organization (24).

    Biochemical Features of Na+/H+ Exchangers
TOP
INTRODUCTION
Structural and Functional...
Biochemical Features of Na+/H+...
Physiological Roles and...
Concluding Remarks
REFERENCES

Transported Cations-- Under physiological conditions, the Na+/H+ exchanger mediates the electroneutral exchange of one extracellular sodium ion for one intracellular proton (for review, see Ref. 25). For the NHE-1, -2, and -3 isoforms, extracellular sodium binding occurs at a site that cannot be distinguished from the Na+ transport site (26), the saturation function following simple Michaelis-Menten kinetics (27). Hence, the simplest model for Na+ transport predicts that sodium binds to a unique external site and is then translocated. For most isoforms, Na+ binding at its external site on Na+/H+ exchangers occurs with a measured Km, which is about 3 times below the physiological extracellular Na+ concentration. The Na+/H+ exchangers are hence close to saturation by extracellular sodium, and moderate variations of this Na+ concentration have virtually no effect on the activity of these antiporters. It has been documented that hypertonic medium moderately activates NHE-1 (28) but has an inhibitory effect on NHE-2 and -3 isoforms (29, 30). Interestingly, the NHE-4 isoform exhibits a radically different behavior with respect to extracellular sodium. This antiporter is directly activated with cooperative kinetics for external sodium (31).

The extracellular cation binding site is not totally selective for sodium, because it can also accommodate H+ and Li+, which can compete with sodium on its extracellular site (26, 32). By contrast, K+ ions, which are larger than Na+ ions, are not transported by the antiporter but inhibit NHE-1, having no effect on NHE-2 and -3 (33).

Competitive Inhibitors-- Dose-response curves of initial rates of Na+/H+ exchange inhibition by guanidinium exhibit a simple competitive behavior, suggesting that sodium and guanidinium are interacting with the same extracellular sodium site (34). Because of the poor affinity of this molecule for the Na+/H+ exchangers, acyl guanidinium derivatives have been widely developed and tested for the inhibition of Na+/H+ exchange. This led to the discovery of amiloride, a diuretic compound that is about 10,000 times more potent than guanidinium itself for the inhibition of the NHE-1 isoform (35). However, because of the lack of specificity and the side effects of this molecule (36, 37), other inhibitors possessing a greater specificity and selectivity for Na+/H+ exchangers have been designed. Basically, all the alkyl 5-N-substituted derivatives of amiloride such as 5-N-dimethyl amiloride or 5-N-ethyl isopropyl amiloride possess a high specificity for NHE-1, inhibiting this isoform with 10-100-fold higher Ki values than amiloride itself (38, 39), while poorly interacting with the other NHE isoforms, which are often referred to in the literature as "amiloride-resistant" Na+/H+ exchangers. A new class of NHE-1 competitive inhibitors (HOE694 and -642) derived from phenylacyl guanidinium derivatives has been shown to be about 4000 times more efficient for NHE-1 inhibition than for NHE-3 (40). These compounds represent promising clinical tools because they possess extremely potent anti-arrythmic properties (41-43) and exhibit very limited side effects, their target being the NHE-1 isoform, which is predominantly expressed in heart (44, 45). Additionally, other compounds unrelated to substituted guanidinium such as cimetidine, clonidine, or harmaline have been shown to inhibit Na+/H+ exchange and can also moderately discriminate between the NHE isoforms (33, 46).

Several inhibitor-resistant mutants were isolated (47), and two amino acid changes (L163F and G174S in the human NHE-1) affecting the interaction of amiloride and 5-N-substituted derivatives with NHE-1 were mapped (48, 49). These two mutations obtained by totally independent approaches are both situated in highly flexible regions of the fourth transmembrane segment of the antiporter. More recently, Noël et al.3 selected HOE694-resistant mutants exhibiting amino acid substitutions in the ninth transmembrane region indicating that this region is also involved in the interaction with NHE-competitive inhibitors, a result confirmed by Orlowski and Kandasamy (50). Similarly, Wang et al. (51) have systematically mutated all the transmembrane histidine residues of NHE-1 to identify crucial residues involved in cation binding. Although these substitutions did not result in any loss of function, the mutation of His-349 to Leu or Gly in the same putative transmembrane segment 9 resulted in a moderate loss in affinity for amiloride. Interestingly the H349F and H349Y are more sensitive to amiloride than the wild-type NHE-1 isoform.

Taken together, these results identify the transmembrane segments 4 and 9 as "hot spots" for inhibitor interaction in the Na+/H+ exchangers.

The activation of the NHE-1, -2, and -3 isoforms is extremely sensitive to low intracellular pH. At physiological intracellular pH values, NHE-1 and -2 are virtually inactive, but they are rapidly activated when the pH value drops below neutrality (26, 52). NHE-3 exhibits a higher affinity for intracellular protons, therefore being active at physiological pH. This results in a higher resting pH for NHE-3-transfected cells (53). For the NHE-1, -2, and -3 isoforms, this pHi dependence exhibits a Hill coefficient of about 1.5-2, depending on the isoform examined and the cell system in which it has been measured. A first explanation for this observation is that an additional proton binding site can allosterically modulate the affinity of the transport site for intracellular H+ (52). Although this proton sensor site has provided a valuable paradigm for the study of the regulation of Na+/H+ exchange, other working hypotheses can be made to account for this cooperative activation. Particularly, as discussed below, the Na+/H+ exchangers exist as dimers in the plasma membrane (18), and several models involving the concerted binding of H+ ions to each monomer can be constructed to explain this cooperative behavior.

Oligomerization seems to be a common feature for many transmembrane proteins including receptors, channels, and transporters (see for example Refs. 54-58), and several pieces of evidence show that Na+/H+ exchangers appear to be oligomeric as well. The NHE-1 isoform can be detected as both a monomer and as dimers on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, indicating that high energy hydrophobic interactions exist between monomers (18). This dimerization seems to occur selectively between two identical isoforms because coexpression of NHE-1 and -3 does not produce heterodimers. Although it seems clear that antiporters exist as homodimers, at least in the plasma membrane there is no conclusive evidence that the functional unit of the protein is dimeric.

    Physiological Roles and Regulation of NHE Isoforms
TOP
INTRODUCTION
Structural and Functional...
Biochemical Features of Na+/H+...
Physiological Roles and...
Concluding Remarks
REFERENCES

The NHE-1 isoform is expressed in virtually all cells and tissues, although the expression pattern of the other NHE isoforms exhibits striking variation among different tissues. The least ambiguous expression pattern is that of NHE-3, which is highly expressed in the kidney (proximal tubule, thin and thick limbs of the loop of Henle) (59) and intestine (jejunum, ileum, ascending and descending colon, and rectum) (60). Whereas NHE-1 is found mostly on the basolateral membrane of epithelial cells (61) or both in the basolateral and apical membranes in epithelial cell lines such as opossum kidney or Madin-Darby canine kidney cells (62), NHE-3 is specifically targeted to the apical membrane (62, 63).

NHE-2, like NHE-3, has been detected both in intestine and kidney and is also targeted to the apical membrane of epithelial cells. However, whereas the presence of NHE-2 in the intestine has been confirmed by independent investigations (see for example Ref. 60), the expression of this protein in the kidney is somewhat controversial (59, 64, 65).

NHE-4 mRNA can be found in the stomach, intestine, kidney, and in the cavi ammoni fields of the hippocampus. In the kidney, NHE-4 is mostly present in the inner medulla collecting duct and has also been found heterogeneously distributed on the basolateral membrane of cortical tubule cells (65).

The recently cloned NHE-5 isoform has been detected predominantly in brain but also in testis, spleen, and skeletal muscle by Northern blot (8), whereas NHE-6, which is expressed in mitochondria, has a wide tissue distribution.

The common mechanism by which intracellular signaling pathways modulate the Na+/H+ exchangers involves the C-terminal region of these proteins, as shown in a series of key experiments. For example, the expression of a chimera consisting of the transmembrane region of the cAMP-insensitive human NHE-1 and the cytosolic region of the cAMP-activable beta -NHE-1 of trout red cells results in a protein which is activated by cAMP, identical to the way the complete beta -NHE-1 isoform behaves (66, 67). Conversely, NHE-3 is inhibited by cAMP in epithelial cells, and a chimeric construct between the transmembrane region of NHE-1 and the cytosolic region of NHE-3 becomes inhibited by cAMP (68). These key findings indicate that the C-terminal domain dictates the type of hormonal regulation in a given cell.

Molecular Dissection of NHE-1 Activation-- NHE-1 activation by an extreme variety of extracellular stimuli, including hormones, integrins, and virtually all growth factors results from an increase in affinity of the transporter for intracellular protons. The simplest model that has been proposed is that the cytoplasmic tail cooperates with the central pHi sensor to decrease the pHi threshold value of NHE-1. In this regard, the cytoplasmic tail is seen as a signal integrator capable of transmitting hormonal signals to the transmembrane built-in pHi sensor (69). Therefore, as for a promoter region of a regulated gene, it is not surprising to see that the NHE-1 cytoplasmic tail has "collected" regulatory boxes that convey specific extracellular signals. For example, all growth factors have been shown to induce a very rapid and transient rise in cytoplasmic calcium as well as a more or less sustained activation of the p42/p44 MAPK cascade. Interestingly and as presented below, the NHE-1 cytoplasmic domain intercepts these distinct signals for transmission into a cytoplasmic alkalinization. Bertrand et al. (70) demonstrated that calmodulin physically interacts with a particular subdomain of the NHE-1 cytosolic region (71) releasing a negative constraint, thus resulting in the activation of NHE-1 by increases in intracellular Ca2+. Therefore, this calmodulin-binding regulatory box is sufficient to account for the rapid and transient activation of NHE-1 in response to growth factors and other Ca2+-mobilizing agonists. By contrast, a similar sequence is not found in NHE-3, which is also regulated by calmodulin, both in a calmodulin kinase-dependent and -independent manner (72).

Direct phosphorylation of NHE1 and/or phosphorylation of ancillary proteins could account for more robust and sustained activation of NHE-1. Both mechanisms have been well documented. First, it was demonstrated that NHE-1 is a phosphoprotein and that its level of phosphorylation is increased in mitogen-stimulated cells when compared with unstimulated controls (13, 73-75). Phosphopeptide mapping carried out on wild-type and deletion mutants of the cytoplasmic region (76) revealed that the phosphorylation sites are located in the C-terminal cytoplasmic region of the protein. Ser-703 was recently demonstrated to be phosphorylated in vivo by the p42/p44 MAPK-activated target, p90RSK (77), and to represent a major site for serum activation. This result is in agreement with our demonstration, using a Raf-activable construct, that p42/p44 MAPK plays a key role in NHE1 activation (78). Besides the MAPK pathway, NHE-1 has been shown to be phosphorylated by p160 ROCK (79), a Rho effector associated with the assembly of stress fibers and focal adhesions. However, p42/p44 MAPK-mediated NHE-1 activation cannot be entirely explained by the direct phosphorylation of NHE-1. First, deletion of the distal cytoplasmic tail containing Ser-703 and other major phosphorylation sites attenuates but does not abolish growth factor activation. The residual activation (about 50%) remains sensitive to the MEK inhibitor PD98059 (78). The simplest working model taking into account this set of results is that additional regulatory proteins, which may themselves be phosphorylated, interact with various domains of the cytosolic region of the exchanger. Candidate proteins have been identified, such as p24 NHE-1 (80), HSP70 (81), CHP (82), and other proteins obtained by double hybrid screening, such as myosin light chain phosphatase.4 Additionally, NHE-1 can be activated by different mechanical stimuli such as osmotic stress or cell spreading. Grinstein et al. (83) have demonstrated that the mechanism of this activation is phosphorylation-independent. In view of their finding that NHE-1 is associated with the actin cytoskeleton in focal adhesion plaques (84), these results suggest that this activation might be mediated by direct contact with cytoskeletal proteins. This hypothesis is reinforced by the fact that the presence of relatively high concentrations of ATP is required for optimal NHE-1 activation (85) and that ATP depletion results in a more homogeneous plasma membrane distribution of NHE-1. As the NHE-1 phosphorylation level is not changed upon cellular ATP depletion, NHE-1 might interact in an ATP-dependent manner with an ancillary protein mediating NHE-1 interaction with cytoskeletal elements (86). Bianchini et al. (78) demonstrated that the p42/44 MAPK is a major pathway for NHE-1 activation by many growth stimuli, whereas the stress-activated kinases and stress kinase pathways (JNK and p38 MAPK) are not involved in the activation of NHE-1 by hypertonicity. Thus the C-terminal domain of NHE-1 can be viewed as a series of regulatory cassettes, where upon phosphorylation or binding of regulatory proteins, the affinity of the transporter for intracellular protons is modulated.

NHE-3 Regulation-- The NHE-3 regulation mechanism is completely different from the NHE-1 activation because the changes in activity reflect modifications of the Vmax of the transporter instead of changes in its apparent affinity for intracellular protons. Using immunofluorescence techniques and confocal microscopy, it is possible to detect NHE-3 accumulation in recycling endosomes (87). Weinman and Shenolikar (88) have described the cloning and characterization of a 538-amino acid NHE regulatory factor (NHE-RF) (for review, see Ref. 88). This protein, which can be either cytoplasmic or membrane-bound, negatively regulates NHE-3 activity by direct binding. When coexpressed in PS120 cells, NHE-RF is able to confer cAMP inhibition to NHE-3. This protein is present in various sections of both the intestine and the kidney tubule. Further, it has been detected in the liver where NHE-3 is not detected, indicating that it could mediate cAMP regulation of proteins other than the NHE-3 isoform. Indeed, NHE-RF-like proteins, such as E3KARP, have been shown to regulate other transmembrane transporters, including the Na-HCO3 or Na-PO4 cotransports. E3KARP can also confer cAMP regulation upon NHE-3, indicating that the NHE regulatory proteins might be multiple (89). Recently Hall et al. (90) demonstrated that the beta 2-adrenergic receptor can directly associate with NHE-RF through its PDZ domain, providing a direct regulation of NHE-3 activity. Similarly, Yun et al. (91) have demonstrated that E3KARP binds directly to an intracellular region within the C-terminal domain of NHE-3 and defined more precisely the protein regions participating in this interaction. Taken together, these results suggest that E3KARP or NHE-RF have a scaffolding function, permitting the co-localization of NHE-3 and kinase A.

Similar to NHE-1, the NHE-3 cytosolic region therefore appears to consist of various regulatory cassettes, which seem to integrate activating and inhibitory signals from various signaling pathways (72). In an independent work Cabado and co-workers (68) showed that the region situated between residues 579 and 684 mediates cAMP inhibition. In this region, which contains 6 Ser, only Ser-605 and -634 are crucial for cAMP inhibition (92). Interestingly, although mutation of Ser-634 affects forskolin response, only Ser-605 is indeed phosphorylated.

    Concluding Remarks
TOP
INTRODUCTION
Structural and Functional...
Biochemical Features of Na+/H+...
Physiological Roles and...
Concluding Remarks
REFERENCES

Gene knockout is an elegant approach to obtain new insights into the physiological role of proteins belonging to multiple gene families. Results from this approach are just emerging for NHE isoforms. Schultheis et al. (93) have constructed knockout mice for NHE-3, an isoform which was expected to largely contribute intestinal sodium absorption as well as kidney sodium reabsorption coupled to bicarbonate reabsorption. As expected, these homozygous knockout mice exhibit a decrease in blood pressure, they are mildly acidotic, and they present absorptive defects both in kidney and intestine. This important result confirms the predicted physiological role of NHE-3 and shows that this isoform, when compared with NHE-1, -2, and -4, mediates the great majority of the absorptive process in kidney and intestine.

By contrast, Cox et al. (94) have reported the molecular characterization of the genetic defect present in epileptic and ataxic (SWE) mice. They discovered that these mice possess a point mutation, which introduces a stop codon in the coding sequence of NHE-1, resulting in the production of a truncated, inactive transporter. The homozygous inactivation of NHE-1 gene function reported thereafter (95) confirmed the non-lethality of this mutation, a finding which was anticipated in light of the ubiquitous expression of compensatory pH-regulating systems such as sodium-dependent Cl-/HCO3- exchangers. Interestingly, these mice have no apparent defects in their acid-base homeostatic balance or in their kidney or intestine function. Rather, they show defects in brain function; this organ, which is highly sensitive to pH, was not initially hypothesized as the main target of the NHE-1 gene disruption. It is therefore tempting to predict that, as for NHE-1, the disruption of the other isoforms may have surprising physiological consequences. Hence, the recent knockout of the NHE-2 isoform in mouse did not result in detectable modifications in intestinal function but in a modified gastric mucosa, resulting in deficient acid secretion in the stomach (96). Therefore, as has been reported for many gene disruptions, the interpretation of the resulting phenotypes might be confusing because of the possible involvement of the NHE isoforms during critical steps of the embryonic development and the presence of compensatory mechanisms in adult mice. In this case, the recent development of tissue-specific gene disruption and of inducible knockout techniques should prove to be very useful for the future physiological studies of Na+/H+ exchange.

    FOOTNOTES

* This minireview will be reprinted in the 2000 Minireview Compendium, which will be available in December, 2000. This work was supported by grants from the Center National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), le Ministère de l'Education Nationale et de la Recherche Technologique, la Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, l'Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer (ARC), and the European Community.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pouysseg@ unice.fr.

2 L. Counillon, unpublished results.

4 P. Fafournoux and J. Pouysségur, unpublished results.

3 J. Noël and J. Pouysségur, manuscript in preparation.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: NHE, Na+/H+ exchanger; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; NHE-RF, NHE regulatory factor.

    REFERENCES
TOP
INTRODUCTION
Structural and Functional...
Biochemical Features of Na+/H+...
Physiological Roles and...
Concluding Remarks
REFERENCES

1. Pouysségur, J., Sardet, C., Franchi, A., L'Allemain, G., and Paris, S. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81, 4833-4837[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Sardet, C., Franchi, A., and Pouysségur, J. (1989) Cell 56, 271-280[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Clark, J. D., and Limbird, L. E. (1991) Am. J. Physiol. 261, C945-C953[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Tse, C. M., Brant, S. R., Walker, M. S., Pouysségur, J., and Donowitz, M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 9340-9346[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Tse, C. M., Levine, S. A., Yun, C. H., Montrose, M. H., Little, P. J., Pouysségur, J., and Donowitz, M. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 11917-11924[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Wang, Z., Orlowski, J., and Shull, G. E. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 11925-11928[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Orlowski, J., Kandasamy, R. A., and Shull, G. E. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 9331-9339[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Klanke, C. A., Su, Y. R., Callen, D. F., Wang, Z., Meneton, P., Baird, N., Kandasamy, R. A., Orlowski, J., Otterud, B. E., Leppert, M., et al.. (1995) Genomics 25, 615-622[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Baird, N. R., Orlowski, J., Szabo, E. Z., Zaun, H. C., Schultheis, P. J., Menon, A. G., and Shull, G. E. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 4377-4382[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Sun, A. M., Liu, Y., Centracchio, J., and Dworkin, L. D. (1998) J. Membr. Biol. 164, 293-300[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Numata, M., Petrecca, K., Lake, N., and Orlowski, J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 6951-6959[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Shrode, L. D., Gan, B. S., D'Souza, S. J., Orlowski, J., and Grinstein, S. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 275, C431-C439[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Sardet, C., Counillon, L., Franchi, A., and Pouysségur, J. (1990) Science 247, 723-726[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Biemesderfer, D., DeGray, B., and Aronson, P. S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 12391-12396[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Counillon, L., Pouysségur, J., and Reithmeier, R. A. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 10463-10469[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Tse, C. M., Levine, S. A., Yun, C. H., Khurana, S., and Donowitz, M. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 12954-12961[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Popov, M., Tam, L. Y., Li, J., and Reithmeier, R. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 18325-18332[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Fafournoux, P., Noel, J., and Pouysségur, J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 2589-2596[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Counillon, L., and Pouysségur, J. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1172, 343-345[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. von Heijne, G. (1986) Nucleic Acids Res. 14, 4683-4690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. von Heijne, G. (1990) J. Membr. Biol. 115, 195-201[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Gaboriaud, C., Bissery, V., Benchetrit, T., and Mornon, J. P. (1987) FEBS Lett. 224, 149-155[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Callebaut, I., Labesse, G., Durand, P., Poupon, A., Canard, L., Chomilier, J., Henrissat, B., and Mornon, J. P. (1997) Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 53, 621-645[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Gebreselassie, D., Rajarathnam, K., and Fliegel, L. (1998) Biochem. Cell Biol. 76, 837-842[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Aronson, P. S. (1985) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 47, 545-560[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Paris, S., and Pouysségur, J. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 3503-3508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Levine, S. A., Montrose, M. H., Tse, C. M., and Donowitz, M. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 25527-25535[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Bianchini, L., Kapus, A., Lukacs, G., Wasan, S., Wakabayashi, S., Pouysségur, J., Yu, F. H., Orlowski, J., and Grinstein, S. (1995) Am. J. Physiol. 269, C998-C1007[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Soleimani, M., Bookstein, C., McAteer, J. A., Hattabaugh, Y. J., Bizal, G. L., Musch, M. W., Villereal, M., Rao, M. C., Howard, R. L., and Chang, E. B. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 15613-15618[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Nath, S. K., Hang, C. Y., Levine, S. A., Yun, C. H., Montrose, M. H., Donowitz, M., and Tse, C. M. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 270, G431-G441[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Bookstein, C., Musch, M. W., DePaoli, A., Xie, Y., Rabenau, K., Villereal, M., Rao, M. C., and Chang, E. B. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 271, C1629-C1638[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Aronson, P. S., Suhm, M. A., and Nee, J. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 6767-6771[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Yu, F. H., Shull, G. E., and Orlowski, J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 25536-25541[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Frelin, C., Vigne, P., Barbry, P., and Lazdunski, M. (1986) Eur. J. Biochem. 154, 241-245[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Cragoe, E. J., Kleyman, T. R., and Simchowitz, L. (eds) (1992) Amiloride and Its Analogs. Unique Cation Transport Inhibitors , VCH Publishers Inc., New York
36. Frelin, C., Barbry, P., Vigne, P., Chassande, O., Cragoe, E. J., Jr., and Lazdunski, M. (1988) Biochimie (Paris) 70, 1285-1290[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Kleyman, T. R., and Cragoe, E. J. (1988) J. Membr. Biol. 105, 1-21[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Vigne, P., Frelin, C., Cragoe, E. J., Jr., and Lazdunski, M. (1984) Mol. Pharmacol. 25, 131-136[Abstract]
39. L'Allemain, G., Franchi, A., Cragoe, E., Jr., and Pouysségur, J. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 4313-4319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Counillon, L., Scholz, W., Lang, H. J., and Pouysségur, J. (1993) Mol. Pharmacol. 44, 1041-1045[Abstract]
41. Scholz, W., Albus, U., Counillon, L., Gogelein, H., Lang, H. J., Linz, W., Weichert, A., and Scholkens, B. A. (1995) Cardiovasc. Res. 29, 260-268[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Xue, Y. X., Aye, N. N., and Hashimoto, K. (1996) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 317, 309-316[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Humphreys, R. A., Haist, J. V., Chakrabarti, S., Feng, Q., Arnold, J. M., and Karmazyn, M. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 276, H749-H757
44. Fliegel, L., Sardet, C., Pouysségur, J., and Barr, A. (1991) FEBS Lett. 279, 25-29[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Loh, S. H., Sun, B., and Vaughan-Jones, R. D. (1996) Br. J. Pharmacol. 118, 1905-1912[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Ramamoorthy, S., Tirruppathi, C., Nair, C. N., Mahesh, V. B., Leibach, F. H., and Ganapathy, V. (1991) Biochem. J. 280, 317-322
47. Franchi, A., Cragoe, E., Jr., and Pouysségur, J. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 14614-14620[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Counillon, L., Franchi, A., and Pouysségur, J. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 4508-4512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Counillon, L., Noel, J., Reithmeier, R. A., and Pouysségur, J. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 2951-2959[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Orlowski, J., and Kandasamy, R. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 19922-19927[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Wang, D., Balkovetz, D. F., and Warnock, D. G. (1995) Am. J. Physiol. 269, C392-C402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Aronson, P. S., Nee, J., and Suhm, M. A. (1982) Nature 299, 161-163[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Wakabayashi, S., Ikeda, T., Noel, J., Schmitt, B., Orlowski, J., Pouysségur, J., and Shigekawa, M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 26460-26465[Abstract/Free Full Text]
54. Coscoy, S., Lingueglia, E., Lazdunski, M., and Barbry, P. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 8317-8322[Abstract/Free Full Text]
55. Casey, J. R., and Reithmeier, R. A. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 15726-15737[Abstract/Free Full Text]
56. Vince, J. W., Sarabia, V. E., and Reithmeier, R. A. (1997) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1326, 295-306[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Wang, D. N., Sarabia, V. E., Reithmeier, R. A., and Kuhlbrandt, W. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 3230-3235[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
58. Hebert, D. N., and Carruthers, A. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 23829-23838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
59. Soleimani, M., Singh, G., Bizal, G. L., Gullans, S. R., and McAteer, J. A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 27973-27978[Abstract/Free Full Text]
60. Dujeda, P. K., Rao, D. D., Syed, I., Joshi, V., Dahdal, R. Y., Gardner, C., Risk, M. C., Schmidt, L., Bavishi, D., Kim, K. E., Harig, J. M., Goldstein, J. L., Layden, T. J., and Ramaswamy, K. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 271, G438-G493[Abstract/Free Full Text]
61. Coupaye-Gerard, B., Bookstein, C., Duncan, P., Chen, X. Y., Smith, P. R., Musch, M., Ernst, S. A., Chang, E. B., and Kleyman, T. R. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 271, C1639-C1645[Abstract/Free Full Text]
62. Noel, J., Roux, D., and Pouysségur, J. (1996) J. Cell Sci. 109, 929-939[Abstract]
63. Hoogerwerf, W. A., Tsao, S. C., Devuyst, O., Levine, S. A., Yun, C. H., Yip, J. W., Cohen, M. E., Wilson, P. D., Lazenby, A. J., Tse, C. M., and Donowitz, M. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 270, G29-G41[Abstract/Free Full Text]
64. Sun, A. M., Liu, Y., Dworkin, L. D., Tse, C. M., Donowitz, M., and Yip, K. P. (1997) J. Membr. Biol. 160, 85-90[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
65. Bookstein, C., Xie, Y., Rabenau, K., Musch, M. W., McSwine, R. L., Rao, M. C., and Chang, E. B. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 273, C1496-C1505
66. Borgese, F., Sardet, C., Cappadoro, M., Pouysségur, J., and Motais, R. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 6765-6769[Abstract/Free Full Text]
67. Borgese, F., Malapert, M., Fievet, B., Pouysségur, J., and Motais, R. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 5431-5435[Abstract/Free Full Text]
68. Cabado, A. G., Yu, F. H., Kapus, A., Lukacs, G., Grinstein, S., and Orlowski, J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 3590-3599[Abstract/Free Full Text]
69. Wakabayashi, S., Fafournoux, P., Sardet, C., and Pouysségur, J. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 2424-2428[Abstract/Free Full Text]
70. Bertrand, B., Wakabayashi, S., Ikeda, T., Pouysségur, J., and Shigekawa, M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 13703-13709[Abstract/Free Full Text]
71. Wakabayashi, S., Bertrand, B., Ikeda, T., Pouysségur, J., and Shigekawa, M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 13710-13715[Abstract/Free Full Text]
72. Levine, S. A., Nath, S. K., Yun, C. H., Yip, J. W., Montrose, M., Donowitz, M., and Tse, C. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13716-13725[Abstract/Free Full Text]
73. Livne, A. A., Sardet, C., and Pouysségur, J. (1991) FEBS Lett. 284, 219-222[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
74. Wang, H., Silva, N. L., Lucchesi, P. A., Haworth, R., Wang, K., Michalak, M., Pelech, S., and Fliegel, L. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 9151-9158[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
75. Sardet, C., Fafournoux, P., and Pouysségur, J. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 19166-19171[Abstract/Free Full Text]
76. Wakabayashi, S., Bertrand, B., Shigekawa, M., Fafournoux, P., and Pouysségur, J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 5583-5588[Abstract/Free Full Text]
77. Takahashi, E., Abe, J., Gallis, B., Aebersold, R., Spring, D. J., Krebs, E. G., and Berk, B. C. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 20206-20214[Abstract/Free Full Text]
78. Bianchini, L., L'Allemain, G., and Pouysségur, J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 271-279[Abstract/Free Full Text]
79. Sahai, E., Alberts, A. S., and Treisman, R. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 1350-1361[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
80. Goss, G., Orlowski, J., and Grinstein, S. (1996) Am. J. Physiol. 270, C1493-C1502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
81. Silva, N. L., Haworth, R. S., Singh, D., and Fliegel, L. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 10412-10420[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
82. Lin, X., and Barber, D. L. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 12631-12636[Abstract/Free Full Text]
83. Grinstein, S., Woodside, M., Sardet, C., Pouysségur, J., and Rotin, D. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 23823-23828[Abstract/Free Full Text]
84. Grinstein, S., Woodside, M., Waddell, T. K., Downey, G. P., Orlowski, J., Pouysségur, J., Wong, D. C., and Foskett, J. K. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 5209-5218[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
85. Demaurex, N., Romanek, R. R., Orlowski, J., and Grinstein, S. (1997) J. Gen. Physiol. 109, 117-128[Abstract/Free Full Text]
86. Goss, G. G., Woodside, M., Wakabayashi, S., Pouysségur, J., Waddell, T., Downey, G. P., and Grinstein, S. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 8741-8748[Abstract/Free Full Text]
87. D'Souza, S., Garcia-Cabado, A., Yu, F., Teter, K., Lukacs, G., Skorecki, K., Moore, H. P., Orlowski, J., and Grinstein, S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 2035-2043[Abstract/Free Full Text]
88. Weinman, E. J., and Shenolikar, S. (1997) Exp. Nephrol. 5, 449-452[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
89. Yun, C. H., Oh, S., Zizak, M., Steplock, D., Tsao, S., Tse, C. M., Weinman, E. J., and Donowitz, M. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 3010-3015[Abstract/Free Full Text]
90. Hall, R. A., Premont, R. T., Chow, C. W., Blitzer, J. T., Pitcher, J. A., Claing, A., Stoffel, R. H., Barak, L. S., Shenolikar, S., Weinman, E. J., Grinstein, S., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1998) Nature 392, 626-630[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
91. Yun, C. H., Lamprecht, G., Forster, D. V., and Sidor, A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 25856-25863[Abstract/Free Full Text]
92. Kurashima, K., Yu, F. H., Cabado, A. G., Szabo, E. Z., Grinstein, S., and Orlowski, J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 28672-28679[Abstract/Free Full Text]
93. Schultheis, P. J., Clarke, L. L., Meneton, P., Miller, M. L., Soleimani, M., Gawenis, L. R., Riddle, T. M., Duffy, J. J., Doetschman, T., Wang, T., Giebisch, G., Aronson, P. S., Lorenz, J. N., and Shull, G. E. (1998) Nat. Genet. 19, 282-285[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
94. Cox, G. A., Lutz, C. M., Yang, C. L., Biemesderfer, D., Bronson, R. T., Fu, A., Aronson, P. S., Noebels, J. L., and Frankel, W. N. (1997) Cell 91, 139-148[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
95. Bell, S. M., Schreiner, C. M., Schultheis, P. J., Miller, M. L., Evans, R. L., Vorhees, C. V., Shull, G. E., and Scott, W. J. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 276, C788-C795
96. Schultheis, P. J., Clarke, L. L., Meneton, P., Harline, M., Boivin, G. P., Stemmermann, G., Duffy, J. J., Doetschman, T., Miller, M. L., and Shull, G. E. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 101, 1243-1253[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. W. Good, T. George, and B. A. Watts III
Nerve Growth Factor Inhibits Na+/H+ Exchange and Formula Absorption through Parallel Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-mTOR and ERK Pathways in Thick Ascending Limb
J. Biol. Chem., September 26, 2008; 283(39): 26602 - 26611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
G. Ivanis, A. J. Esbaugh, and S. F. Perry
Branchial expression and localization of SLC9A2 and SLC9A3 sodium/hydrogen exchangers and their possible role in acid-base regulation in freshwater rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2008; 211(15): 2467 - 2477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. Segalen, S. L. Longnus, D. Baetz, L. Counillon, and E. Van Obberghen
5-Aminoimidazole-4-Carboxamide-1-{beta}-D-Ribofuranoside Reduces Glucose Uptake via the Inhibition of Na+/H+ Exchanger 1 in Isolated Rat Ventricular Cardiomyocytes
Endocrinology, April 1, 2008; 149(4): 1490 - 1498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
E. D. Johnstone, P. F. Speake, and C. P. Sibley
Epidermal growth factor and sphingosine-1-phosphate stimulate Na+/H+ exchanger activity in the human placental syncytiotrophoblast
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): R2290 - R2294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
Y. Iwata, Y. Katanosaka, T. Hisamitsu, and S. Wakabayashi
Enhanced Na+/H+ Exchange Activity Contributes to the Pathogenesis of Muscular Dystrophy via Involvement of P2 Receptors
Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2007; 171(5): 1576 - 1587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
A. Kanaan, R. M. Douglas, S. L. Alper, W. F. Boron, and G. G. Haddad
Effect of chronic elevated carbon dioxide on the expression of acid-base transporters in the neonatal and adult mouse
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): R1294 - R1302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
M. Matsushita, Y. Sano, S. Yokoyama, T. Takai, H. Inoue, K. Mitsui, K. Todo, H. Ohmori, and H. Kanazawa
Loss of calcineurin homologous protein-1 in chicken B lymphoma DT40 cells destabilizes Na+/H+ exchanger isoform-1 protein
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): C246 - C254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
J. Xue, D. Zhou, H. Yao, O. Gavrialov, M. J. McConnell, B. D. Gelb, and G. G. Haddad
Novel functional interaction between Na+/H+ exchanger 1 and tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): R2406 - R2416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
W. Kang'ethe, K. G. Aimanova, A. K. Pullikuth, and S. S. Gill
NHE8 mediates amiloride-sensitive Na+/H+ exchange across mosquito Malpighian tubules and catalyzes Na+ and K+ transport in reconstituted proteoliposomes
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): F1501 - F1512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.