![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 1, 1-4, January 7, 2000
From the
Maintaining intracellular pH values close to
neutrality is a crucial task for a wide variety of cells. Hence,
various mechanisms for pH regulation have been selected early in
evolution and are ubiquitously distributed. Among the actors in this
scene, the members of the Na+/H+ exchanger gene
family (NHE1 isoforms) are
widely expressed and constitute extremely efficient systems for
protecting cells against internal acidification. To date, at least six
genes have been identified in mammalian cells, and to various extents,
the corresponding proteins have been molecularly and functionally
characterized. In this short review, we will update our current
knowledge on these NHE family members and highlight the most important
aspects of the basic function of these transporters. Then, in a broader
physiological context, we will present what we think are the most
prominent specific features of the different NHE isoforms.
The first cDNA encoding the NHE-1 isoform was cloned using an
expression strategy based on the ability of
Na+/H+ exchangers to protect
antiporter-deficient cells (1) against otherwise lethal intracellular
acidification (2). Variations in the hormonal regulation and
pharmacological features of Na+/H+ exchange were the first
indications that a large family of Na+/H+ exchange
molecules existed (3). Therefore, using the NHE-1 cDNA as a probe
led to the molecular identification of the NHE-2, -3, and -4 (4-7)
isoforms. In addition, non-epithelial isoforms such as NHE-5 (8-10)
and NHE-6 have been cloned recently. By contrast to the other
Na+/H+ exchangers, NHE-6 is not expressed at
the plasma membrane but in the mitochondria (11).
Topological Features and Sequence Conservation--
The highly
hydrophobic N-terminal region of the protein is predicted to span the
membrane 10-12 times depending on the algorithm used to calculate the
hydropathy plot of the protein. In particular, the region situated in
the central part of the transmembrane domain (residues 226-281 in the
human NHE-1) is quite hydrophobic but contains several negatively
charged residues. By contrast the C-terminal region of the
Na+/H+ exchangers is hydrophilic and has been
shown to be located in the cell cytoplasm, at least for the NHE-1
isoform (12, 13). Interestingly, recent experiments on the NHE-3
isoform seem to indicate that epitopes within the C-terminal region of
this protein are extracellularly exposed (14). For NHE-1 and -2, the
loop between the putative transmembrane segments 1 and 2 is
glycosylated and therefore extracellular (15, 16). Methods such as
scanning N-glycosylation mutagenesis (17) will be necessary
to gain further topological information.
Sequence Comparison between NHE Isoforms--
The transmembrane
domain exhibits from 45 to 65% amino acid identity, although this
score drops to about 25-35% for the cytoplasmic domain. A more
detailed analysis of the sequence homology clusters reveals the
presence of two subfamilies of isoforms that have probably diverged
later in evolution: NHE-2 and -4 as well as NHE-3 and -5. The central
part of the domain (putative transmembrane segments 5a and 5b between
residues 226 and 281 in human NHE-1) is nearly identical between all
the NHE isoforms. This part of the polypeptide possesses negatively
charged residues (aspartates 226, 238, and 267 and glutamates 247, 248, 253, and 262 in the human NHE-1) included in a highly hydrophobic
stretch of sequence, and the substitution of Glu-262 in the NHE-1
isoform results in the inactivation of the transporter (18). Although
it is not possible to rule out an indirect effect of this mutation,
this result in association with the extreme sequence conservation of this region among the NHE members strongly suggests that these two
transmembrane segments of the exchangers constitute the catalytic core
of the Na+/H+ exchangers.
By contrast, the first putative transmembrane segment of the
Na+/H+ exchangers and the first extracellular
loop are not well conserved in the NHE family. These N-terminal
sequences are divergent even in the same isoform cloned from various
mammalian species (19), indicating that sequence conservation in the
first extracellular loop is not crucial for the function of the
protein. A closer analysis of the first stretch of hydrophobic residues
using the von Heijne rules (20, 21) reveals that this first putative transmembrane segment has the features of a signal peptide, including a
positively charged N-terminal end and a relatively short hydrophobic stretch.
Although the cytosolic domain sequence seems to be more poorly
conserved, alignment methods based on the presence of hydrophobic secondary structures (hydrophobic score analysis) (22, 23) show that
these C-terminal domains clearly exhibit structural similarities.2 Recently,
circular dichroism measurements performed on the Escherichia coli-expressed NHE-1 C-terminal region confirmed that this part of
the protein possesses a high degree of structural organization (24).
Transported Cations--
Under physiological conditions, the
Na+/H+ exchanger mediates the electroneutral
exchange of one extracellular sodium ion for one intracellular proton
(for review, see Ref. 25). For the NHE-1, -2, and -3 isoforms,
extracellular sodium binding occurs at a site that cannot be
distinguished from the Na+ transport site (26), the
saturation function following simple Michaelis-Menten kinetics (27).
Hence, the simplest model for Na+ transport predicts that
sodium binds to a unique external site and is then translocated. For
most isoforms, Na+ binding at its external site on
Na+/H+ exchangers occurs with a measured
Km, which is about 3 times below the physiological
extracellular Na+ concentration. The
Na+/H+ exchangers are hence close to saturation
by extracellular sodium, and moderate variations of this
Na+ concentration have virtually no effect on the activity
of these antiporters. It has been documented that hypertonic medium
moderately activates NHE-1 (28) but has an inhibitory effect on NHE-2
and -3 isoforms (29, 30). Interestingly, the NHE-4 isoform exhibits a
radically different behavior with respect to extracellular sodium. This
antiporter is directly activated with cooperative kinetics for external
sodium (31).
The extracellular cation binding site is not totally selective for
sodium, because it can also accommodate H+ and
Li+, which can compete with sodium on its extracellular
site (26, 32). By contrast, K+ ions, which are larger than
Na+ ions, are not transported by the antiporter but inhibit
NHE-1, having no effect on NHE-2 and -3 (33).
Competitive Inhibitors--
Dose-response curves of initial rates
of Na+/H+ exchange inhibition by guanidinium
exhibit a simple competitive behavior, suggesting that sodium and
guanidinium are interacting with the same extracellular sodium site
(34). Because of the poor affinity of this molecule for the
Na+/H+ exchangers, acyl guanidinium derivatives
have been widely developed and tested for the inhibition of
Na+/H+ exchange. This led to the discovery of
amiloride, a diuretic compound that is about 10,000 times more potent
than guanidinium itself for the inhibition of the NHE-1 isoform (35).
However, because of the lack of specificity and the side effects of
this molecule (36, 37), other inhibitors possessing a greater
specificity and selectivity for Na+/H+
exchangers have been designed. Basically, all the alkyl
5-N-substituted derivatives of amiloride such as
5-N-dimethyl amiloride or 5-N-ethyl isopropyl
amiloride possess a high specificity for NHE-1, inhibiting this isoform
with 10-100-fold higher Ki values than amiloride itself (38, 39), while poorly interacting with the other NHE isoforms,
which are often referred to in the literature as
"amiloride-resistant" Na+/H+ exchangers. A
new class of NHE-1 competitive inhibitors (HOE694 and -642) derived
from phenylacyl guanidinium derivatives has been shown to be about 4000 times more efficient for NHE-1 inhibition than for NHE-3 (40). These
compounds represent promising clinical tools because they possess
extremely potent anti-arrythmic properties (41-43) and exhibit very
limited side effects, their target being the NHE-1 isoform, which is
predominantly expressed in heart (44, 45). Additionally, other
compounds unrelated to substituted guanidinium such as cimetidine,
clonidine, or harmaline have been shown to inhibit
Na+/H+ exchange and can also moderately
discriminate between the NHE isoforms (33, 46).
Several inhibitor-resistant mutants were isolated (47), and two amino
acid changes (L163F and G174S in the human NHE-1) affecting the
interaction of amiloride and 5-N-substituted derivatives with NHE-1 were mapped (48, 49). These two mutations obtained by
totally independent approaches are both situated in highly flexible
regions of the fourth transmembrane segment of the antiporter. More
recently, Noël et
al.3 selected
HOE694-resistant mutants exhibiting amino acid substitutions in the
ninth transmembrane region indicating that this region is also involved
in the interaction with NHE-competitive inhibitors, a result confirmed
by Orlowski and Kandasamy (50). Similarly, Wang et al.
(51) have systematically mutated all the transmembrane histidine
residues of NHE-1 to identify crucial residues involved in cation
binding. Although these substitutions did not result in any loss of
function, the mutation of His-349 to Leu or Gly in the same putative
transmembrane segment 9 resulted in a moderate loss in affinity for
amiloride. Interestingly the H349F and H349Y are more sensitive to
amiloride than the wild-type NHE-1 isoform.
Taken together, these results identify the transmembrane segments 4 and
9 as "hot spots" for inhibitor interaction in the Na+/H+ exchangers.
The activation of the NHE-1, -2, and -3 isoforms is extremely
sensitive to low intracellular pH. At physiological intracellular pH
values, NHE-1 and -2 are virtually inactive, but they are rapidly activated when the pH value drops below neutrality (26, 52). NHE-3
exhibits a higher affinity for intracellular protons, therefore being
active at physiological pH. This results in a higher resting pH for
NHE-3-transfected cells (53). For the NHE-1, -2, and -3 isoforms, this
pHi dependence exhibits a Hill coefficient of about 1.5-2,
depending on the isoform examined and the cell system in which it has
been measured. A first explanation for this observation is that an
additional proton binding site can allosterically modulate the affinity
of the transport site for intracellular H+ (52). Although
this proton sensor site has provided a valuable paradigm for the study
of the regulation of Na+/H+ exchange, other
working hypotheses can be made to account for this cooperative
activation. Particularly, as discussed below, the
Na+/H+ exchangers exist as dimers in the plasma
membrane (18), and several models involving the concerted binding of
H+ ions to each monomer can be constructed to explain this
cooperative behavior.
Oligomerization seems to be a common feature for many
transmembrane proteins including receptors, channels, and transporters (see for example Refs. 54-58), and several pieces of evidence show that Na+/H+ exchangers appear to be oligomeric
as well. The NHE-1 isoform can be detected as both a monomer and as
dimers on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, indicating that high
energy hydrophobic interactions exist between monomers (18). This
dimerization seems to occur selectively between two identical isoforms
because coexpression of NHE-1 and -3 does not produce heterodimers.
Although it seems clear that antiporters exist as homodimers, at least
in the plasma membrane there is no conclusive evidence that the
functional unit of the protein is dimeric.
The NHE-1 isoform is expressed in virtually all cells and
tissues, although the expression pattern of the other NHE isoforms exhibits striking variation among different tissues. The least ambiguous expression pattern is that of NHE-3, which is highly expressed in the kidney (proximal tubule, thin and thick limbs of the
loop of Henle) (59) and intestine (jejunum, ileum, ascending and
descending colon, and rectum) (60). Whereas NHE-1 is found mostly on
the basolateral membrane of epithelial cells (61) or both in the
basolateral and apical membranes in epithelial cell lines such as
opossum kidney or Madin-Darby canine kidney cells (62), NHE-3 is
specifically targeted to the apical membrane (62, 63).
NHE-2, like NHE-3, has been detected both in intestine and kidney and
is also targeted to the apical membrane of epithelial cells. However,
whereas the presence of NHE-2 in the intestine has been confirmed by
independent investigations (see for example Ref. 60), the expression of
this protein in the kidney is somewhat controversial (59, 64, 65).
NHE-4 mRNA can be found in the stomach, intestine, kidney, and in
the cavi ammoni fields of the hippocampus. In the kidney, NHE-4 is
mostly present in the inner medulla collecting duct and has also been
found heterogeneously distributed on the basolateral membrane of
cortical tubule cells (65).
The recently cloned NHE-5 isoform has been detected predominantly in
brain but also in testis, spleen, and skeletal muscle by Northern blot
(8), whereas NHE-6, which is expressed in mitochondria, has a wide
tissue distribution.
The common mechanism by which intracellular signaling pathways
modulate the Na+/H+ exchangers involves the
C-terminal region of these proteins, as shown in a series of key
experiments. For example, the expression of a chimera consisting of the
transmembrane region of the cAMP-insensitive human NHE-1 and the
cytosolic region of the cAMP-activable Molecular Dissection of NHE-1 Activation--
NHE-1 activation by
an extreme variety of extracellular stimuli, including hormones,
integrins, and virtually all growth factors results from an increase in
affinity of the transporter for intracellular protons. The simplest
model that has been proposed is that the cytoplasmic tail cooperates
with the central pHi sensor to decrease the pHi
threshold value of NHE-1. In this regard, the cytoplasmic tail is seen
as a signal integrator capable of transmitting hormonal signals to the
transmembrane built-in pHi sensor (69). Therefore, as for a
promoter region of a regulated gene, it is not surprising to see that
the NHE-1 cytoplasmic tail has "collected" regulatory boxes that
convey specific extracellular signals. For example, all growth factors have been shown to induce a very rapid and transient rise in
cytoplasmic calcium as well as a more or less sustained activation of
the p42/p44 MAPK cascade. Interestingly and as presented below, the NHE-1 cytoplasmic domain intercepts these distinct signals for transmission into a cytoplasmic alkalinization. Bertrand et
al. (70) demonstrated that calmodulin physically interacts with a
particular subdomain of the NHE-1 cytosolic region (71) releasing a
negative constraint, thus resulting in the activation of NHE-1 by
increases in intracellular Ca2+. Therefore, this
calmodulin-binding regulatory box is sufficient to account for the
rapid and transient activation of NHE-1 in response to growth factors
and other Ca2+-mobilizing agonists. By contrast, a similar
sequence is not found in NHE-3, which is also regulated by calmodulin,
both in a calmodulin kinase-dependent and -independent
manner (72).
Direct phosphorylation of NHE1 and/or phosphorylation of ancillary
proteins could account for more robust and sustained activation of
NHE-1. Both mechanisms have been well documented. First, it was
demonstrated that NHE-1 is a phosphoprotein and that its level of
phosphorylation is increased in mitogen-stimulated cells when compared
with unstimulated controls (13, 73-75). Phosphopeptide mapping carried
out on wild-type and deletion mutants of the cytoplasmic region (76)
revealed that the phosphorylation sites are located in the C-terminal
cytoplasmic region of the protein. Ser-703 was recently demonstrated to
be phosphorylated in vivo by the p42/p44 MAPK-activated
target, p90RSK (77), and to represent a major site for
serum activation. This result is in agreement with our demonstration,
using a Raf-activable construct, that p42/p44 MAPK plays a key role in
NHE1 activation (78). Besides the MAPK pathway, NHE-1 has been shown to
be phosphorylated by p160 ROCK (79), a Rho effector associated with the
assembly of stress fibers and focal adhesions. However, p42/p44
MAPK-mediated NHE-1 activation cannot be entirely explained by the
direct phosphorylation of NHE-1. First, deletion of the distal
cytoplasmic tail containing Ser-703 and other major phosphorylation
sites attenuates but does not abolish growth factor activation. The
residual activation (about 50%) remains sensitive to the MEK inhibitor
PD98059 (78). The simplest working model taking into account this set
of results is that additional regulatory proteins, which may themselves
be phosphorylated, interact with various domains of the cytosolic region of the exchanger. Candidate proteins have been identified, such
as p24 NHE-1 (80), HSP70 (81), CHP (82), and other proteins obtained by
double hybrid screening, such as myosin light chain
phosphatase.4 Additionally, NHE-1
can be activated by different mechanical stimuli such as osmotic stress
or cell spreading. Grinstein et al. (83) have demonstrated
that the mechanism of this activation is phosphorylation-independent.
In view of their finding that NHE-1 is associated with the actin
cytoskeleton in focal adhesion plaques (84), these results suggest that
this activation might be mediated by direct contact with cytoskeletal
proteins. This hypothesis is reinforced by the fact that the presence
of relatively high concentrations of ATP is required for optimal NHE-1
activation (85) and that ATP depletion results in a more homogeneous
plasma membrane distribution of NHE-1. As the NHE-1 phosphorylation
level is not changed upon cellular ATP depletion, NHE-1 might interact in an ATP-dependent manner with an ancillary protein
mediating NHE-1 interaction with cytoskeletal elements (86). Bianchini et al. (78) demonstrated that the p42/44 MAPK is a major
pathway for NHE-1 activation by many growth stimuli, whereas the
stress-activated kinases and stress kinase pathways (JNK and p38 MAPK)
are not involved in the activation of NHE-1 by hypertonicity. Thus the C-terminal domain of NHE-1 can be viewed as a series of regulatory cassettes, where upon phosphorylation or binding of regulatory proteins, the affinity of the transporter for intracellular protons is modulated.
NHE-3 Regulation--
The NHE-3 regulation mechanism is completely
different from the NHE-1 activation because the changes in activity
reflect modifications of the Vmax of the
transporter instead of changes in its apparent affinity for
intracellular protons. Using immunofluorescence techniques and confocal
microscopy, it is possible to detect NHE-3 accumulation in recycling
endosomes (87). Weinman and Shenolikar (88) have described the cloning
and characterization of a 538-amino acid NHE regulatory factor (NHE-RF)
(for review, see Ref. 88). This protein, which can be either
cytoplasmic or membrane-bound, negatively regulates NHE-3 activity by
direct binding. When coexpressed in PS120 cells, NHE-RF is able to
confer cAMP inhibition to NHE-3. This protein is present in various
sections of both the intestine and the kidney tubule. Further, it has
been detected in the liver where NHE-3 is not detected, indicating that
it could mediate cAMP regulation of proteins other than the NHE-3
isoform. Indeed, NHE-RF-like proteins, such as E3KARP, have been shown
to regulate other transmembrane transporters, including the
Na-HCO3 or Na-PO4 cotransports. E3KARP can also
confer cAMP regulation upon NHE-3, indicating that the NHE regulatory
proteins might be multiple (89). Recently Hall et al. (90)
demonstrated that the
Similar to NHE-1, the NHE-3 cytosolic region therefore appears to
consist of various regulatory cassettes, which seem to integrate activating and inhibitory signals from various signaling pathways (72).
In an independent work Cabado and co-workers (68) showed that the
region situated between residues 579 and 684 mediates cAMP inhibition.
In this region, which contains 6 Ser, only Ser-605 and -634 are crucial
for cAMP inhibition (92). Interestingly, although mutation of Ser-634
affects forskolin response, only Ser-605 is indeed phosphorylated.
Gene knockout is an elegant approach to obtain new insights into
the physiological role of proteins belonging to multiple gene families.
Results from this approach are just emerging for NHE isoforms.
Schultheis et al. (93) have constructed knockout mice for
NHE-3, an isoform which was expected to largely contribute intestinal
sodium absorption as well as kidney sodium reabsorption coupled to
bicarbonate reabsorption. As expected, these homozygous knockout mice
exhibit a decrease in blood pressure, they are mildly acidotic, and
they present absorptive defects both in kidney and intestine. This
important result confirms the predicted physiological role of NHE-3 and
shows that this isoform, when compared with NHE-1, -2, and -4, mediates
the great majority of the absorptive process in kidney and intestine.
By contrast, Cox et al. (94) have reported the molecular
characterization of the genetic defect present in epileptic and ataxic
(SWE) mice. They discovered that these mice possess a point mutation,
which introduces a stop codon in the coding sequence of NHE-1,
resulting in the production of a truncated, inactive transporter. The
homozygous inactivation of NHE-1 gene function reported thereafter (95)
confirmed the non-lethality of this mutation, a finding which was
anticipated in light of the ubiquitous expression of compensatory
pH-regulating systems such as sodium-dependent Cl *
This minireview will be reprinted
in the 2000 Minireview Compendium, which
will be available in December, 2000. This work was supported by grants from the Center
National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), le Ministère de
l'Education Nationale et de la Recherche Technologique, la Ligue
Nationale Contre le Cancer, l'Association pour la Recherche contre le
Cancer (ARC), and the European Community.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
pouysseg@ unice.fr.
2
L. Counillon, unpublished results.
4
P. Fafournoux and J. Pouysségur,
unpublished results.
3
J. Noël and J. Pouysségur,
manuscript in preparation.
The abbreviations used are:
NHE, Na+/H+ exchanger;
RT-PCR, reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reaction;
MAPK, mitogen-activated
protein kinase;
NHE-RF, NHE regulatory factor.
MINIREVIEW
The Expanding Family of Eucaryotic Na+/H+
Exchangers*
and
Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire et
Moléculaire, CNRS UMR 6548 and § Institute of
Signaling, Developmental Biology and Cancer Research, CNRS UMR 6543 Centre A. Lacassagne, 33 Av. de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
INTRODUCTION
Structural and Functional...
Biochemical Features of Na+/H+...
Physiological Roles and...
Concluding Remarks
REFERENCES
![]()
Structural and Functional Domains of NHEs
TOP
INTRODUCTION
Structural and Functional...
Biochemical Features of Na+/H+...
Physiological Roles and...
Concluding Remarks
REFERENCES
![]()
Biochemical Features of Na+/H+
Exchangers
TOP
INTRODUCTION
Structural and Functional...
Biochemical Features of Na+/H+...
Physiological Roles and...
Concluding Remarks
REFERENCES
![]()
Physiological Roles and Regulation of NHE Isoforms
TOP
INTRODUCTION
Structural and Functional...
Biochemical Features of Na+/H+...
Physiological Roles and...
Concluding Remarks
REFERENCES
-NHE-1 of trout red cells
results in a protein which is activated by cAMP, identical to the way
the complete
-NHE-1 isoform behaves (66, 67). Conversely, NHE-3 is
inhibited by cAMP in epithelial cells, and a chimeric construct between
the transmembrane region of NHE-1 and the cytosolic region of NHE-3
becomes inhibited by cAMP (68). These key findings indicate that the
C-terminal domain dictates the type of hormonal regulation in a given cell.
2-adrenergic receptor can directly
associate with NHE-RF through its PDZ domain, providing a direct
regulation of NHE-3 activity. Similarly, Yun et al. (91)
have demonstrated that E3KARP binds directly to an intracellular region
within the C-terminal domain of NHE-3 and defined more precisely the
protein regions participating in this interaction. Taken together,
these results suggest that E3KARP or NHE-RF have a scaffolding
function, permitting the co-localization of NHE-3 and kinase A.
![]()
Concluding Remarks
TOP
INTRODUCTION
Structural and Functional...
Biochemical Features of Na+/H+...
Physiological Roles and...
Concluding Remarks
REFERENCES
/HCO3
exchangers.
Interestingly, these mice have no apparent defects in their acid-base
homeostatic balance or in their kidney or intestine function. Rather,
they show defects in brain function; this organ, which is highly
sensitive to pH, was not initially hypothesized as the main target of
the NHE-1 gene disruption. It is therefore tempting to predict that, as
for NHE-1, the disruption of the other isoforms may have surprising
physiological consequences. Hence, the recent knockout of the NHE-2
isoform in mouse did not result in detectable modifications in
intestinal function but in a modified gastric mucosa, resulting in
deficient acid secretion in the stomach (96). Therefore, as has been
reported for many gene disruptions, the interpretation of the resulting
phenotypes might be confusing because of the possible involvement of
the NHE isoforms during critical steps of the embryonic development and
the presence of compensatory mechanisms in adult mice. In this case,
the recent development of tissue-specific gene disruption and of
inducible knockout techniques should prove to be very useful for the
future physiological studies of Na+/H+ exchange.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
INTRODUCTION
Structural and Functional...
Biochemical Features of Na+/H+...
Physiological Roles and...
Concluding Remarks
REFERENCES
1.
Pouysségur, J.,
Sardet, C.,
Franchi, A.,
L'Allemain, G.,
and Paris, S.
(1984)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
81,
4833-4837 2.
Sardet, C.,
Franchi, A.,
and Pouysségur, J.
(1989)
Cell
56,
271-280[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Clark, J. D.,
and Limbird, L. E.
(1991)
Am. J. Physiol.
261,
C945-C953 4.
Tse, C. M.,
Brant, S. R.,
Walker, M. S.,
Pouysségur, J.,
and Donowitz, M.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
9340-9346 5.
Tse, C. M.,
Levine, S. A.,
Yun, C. H.,
Montrose, M. H.,
Little, P. J.,
Pouysségur, J.,
and Donowitz, M.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
11917-11924 6.
Wang, Z.,
Orlowski, J.,
and Shull, G. E.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
11925-11928 7.
Orlowski, J.,
Kandasamy, R. A.,
and Shull, G. E.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
9331-9339 8.
Klanke, C. A.,
Su, Y. R.,
Callen, D. F.,
Wang, Z.,
Meneton, P.,
Baird, N.,
Kandasamy, R. A.,
Orlowski, J.,
Otterud, B. E.,
Leppert, M.,
et al..
(1995)
Genomics
25,
615-622[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Baird, N. R.,
Orlowski, J.,
Szabo, E. Z.,
Zaun, H. C.,
Schultheis, P. J.,
Menon, A. G.,
and Shull, G. E.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
4377-4382 10.
Sun, A. M.,
Liu, Y.,
Centracchio, J.,
and Dworkin, L. D.
(1998)
J. Membr. Biol.
164,
293-300[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Numata, M.,
Petrecca, K.,
Lake, N.,
and Orlowski, J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
6951-6959 12.
Shrode, L. D.,
Gan, B. S.,
D'Souza, S. J.,
Orlowski, J.,
and Grinstein, S.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
275,
C431-C439 13.
Sardet, C.,
Counillon, L.,
Franchi, A.,
and Pouysségur, J.
(1990)
Science
247,
723-726 14.
Biemesderfer, D.,
DeGray, B.,
and Aronson, P. S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
12391-12396 15.
Counillon, L.,
Pouysségur, J.,
and Reithmeier, R. A.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
10463-10469[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Tse, C. M.,
Levine, S. A.,
Yun, C. H.,
Khurana, S.,
and Donowitz, M.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
12954-12961[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Popov, M.,
Tam, L. Y.,
Li, J.,
and Reithmeier, R. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
18325-18332 18.
Fafournoux, P.,
Noel, J.,
and Pouysségur, J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
2589-2596 19.
Counillon, L.,
and Pouysségur, J.
(1993)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1172,
343-345[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
von Heijne, G.
(1986)
Nucleic Acids Res.
14,
4683-4690 21.
von Heijne, G.
(1990)
J. Membr. Biol.
115,
195-201[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Gaboriaud, C.,
Bissery, V.,
Benchetrit, T.,
and Mornon, J. P.
(1987)
FEBS Lett.
224,
149-155[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Callebaut, I.,
Labesse, G.,
Durand, P.,
Poupon, A.,
Canard, L.,
Chomilier, J.,
Henrissat, B.,
and Mornon, J. P.
(1997)
Cell. Mol. Life Sci.
53,
621-645[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Gebreselassie, D.,
Rajarathnam, K.,
and Fliegel, L.
(1998)
Biochem. Cell Biol.
76,
837-842[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Aronson, P. S.
(1985)
Annu. Rev. Physiol.
47,
545-560[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Paris, S.,
and Pouysségur, J.
(1983)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
3503-3508 27.
Levine, S. A.,
Montrose, M. H.,
Tse, C. M.,
and Donowitz, M.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
25527-25535 28.
Bianchini, L.,
Kapus, A.,
Lukacs, G.,
Wasan, S.,
Wakabayashi, S.,
Pouysségur, J., Yu, F. H.,
Orlowski, J.,
and Grinstein, S.
(1995)
Am. J. Physiol.
269,
C998-C1007 29.
Soleimani, M.,
Bookstein, C.,
McAteer, J. A.,
Hattabaugh, Y. J.,
Bizal, G. L.,
Musch, M. W.,
Villereal, M.,
Rao, M. C.,
Howard, R. L.,
and Chang, E. B.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
15613-15618 30.
Nath, S. K.,
Hang, C. Y.,
Levine, S. A.,
Yun, C. H.,
Montrose, M. H.,
Donowitz, M.,
and Tse, C. M.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
270,
G431-G441 31.
Bookstein, C.,
Musch, M. W.,
DePaoli, A.,
Xie, Y.,
Rabenau, K.,
Villereal, M.,
Rao, M. C.,
and Chang, E. B.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
271,
C1629-C1638 32.
Aronson, P. S.,
Suhm, M. A.,
and Nee, J.
(1983)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
6767-6771 33.
Yu, F. H.,
Shull, G. E.,
and Orlowski, J.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
25536-25541 34.
Frelin, C.,
Vigne, P.,
Barbry, P.,
and Lazdunski, M.
(1986)
Eur. J. Biochem.
154,
241-245[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Cragoe, E. J., Kleyman, T. R., and Simchowitz, L.
(eds)
(1992)
Amiloride and Its Analogs. Unique Cation Transport Inhibitors
, VCH Publishers Inc., New York
36.
Frelin, C.,
Barbry, P.,
Vigne, P.,
Chassande, O.,
Cragoe, E. J., Jr.,
and Lazdunski, M.
(1988)
Biochimie (Paris)
70,
1285-1290[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
37.
Kleyman, T. R.,
and Cragoe, E. J.
(1988)
J. Membr. Biol.
105,
1-21[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
Vigne, P.,
Frelin, C.,
Cragoe, E. J., Jr.,
and Lazdunski, M.
(1984)
Mol. Pharmacol.
25,
131-136[Abstract]
39.
L'Allemain, G.,
Franchi, A.,
Cragoe, E., Jr.,
and Pouysségur, J.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
4313-4319 40.
Counillon, L.,
Scholz, W.,
Lang, H. J.,
and Pouysségur, J.
(1993)
Mol. Pharmacol.
44,
1041-1045[Abstract]
41.
Scholz, W.,
Albus, U.,
Counillon, L.,
Gogelein, H.,
Lang, H. J.,
Linz, W.,
Weichert, A.,
and Scholkens, B. A.
(1995)
Cardiovasc. Res.
29,
260-268[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
42.
Xue, Y. X.,
Aye, N. N.,
and Hashimoto, K.
(1996)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
317,
309-316[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
43.
Humphreys, R. A.,
Haist, J. V.,
Chakrabarti, S.,
Feng, Q.,
Arnold, J. M.,
and Karmazyn, M.
(1999)
Am. J. Physiol.
276,
H749-H757
44.
Fliegel, L.,
Sardet, C.,
Pouysségur, J.,
and Barr, A.
(1991)
FEBS Lett.
279,
25-29[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
45.
Loh, S. H.,
Sun, B.,
and Vaughan-Jones, R. D.
(1996)
Br. J. Pharmacol.
118,
1905-1912[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
46.
Ramamoorthy, S.,
Tirruppathi, C.,
Nair, C. N.,
Mahesh, V. B.,
Leibach, F. H.,
and Ganapathy, V.
(1991)
Biochem. J.
280,
317-322
47.
Franchi, A.,
Cragoe, E., Jr.,
and Pouysségur, J.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
14614-14620 48.
Counillon, L.,
Franchi, A.,
and Pouysségur, J.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
4508-4512 49.
Counillon, L.,
Noel, J.,
Reithmeier, R. A.,
and Pouysségur, J.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
2951-2959[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
50.
Orlowski, J.,
and Kandasamy, R. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
19922-19927 51.
Wang, D.,
Balkovetz, D. F.,
and Warnock, D. G.
(1995)
Am. J. Physiol.
269,
C392-C402 52.
Aronson, P. S.,
Nee, J.,
and Suhm, M. A.
(1982)
Nature
299,
161-163[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
53.
Wakabayashi, S.,
Ikeda, T.,
Noel, J.,
Schmitt, B.,
Orlowski, J.,
Pouysségur, J.,
and Shigekawa, M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
26460-26465 54.
Coscoy, S.,
Lingueglia, E.,
Lazdunski, M.,
and Barbry, P.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
8317-8322 55.
Casey, J. R.,
and Reithmeier, R. A.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
15726-15737 56.
Vince, J. W.,
Sarabia, V. E.,
and Reithmeier, R. A.
(1997)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1326,
295-306[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
57.
Wang, D. N.,
Sarabia, V. E.,
Reithmeier, R. A.,
and Kuhlbrandt, W.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
3230-3235[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
58.
Hebert, D. N.,
and Carruthers, A.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
23829-23838 59.
Soleimani, M.,
Singh, G.,
Bizal, G. L.,
Gullans, S. R.,
and McAteer, J. A.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
27973-27978 60.
Dujeda, P. K.,
Rao, D. D.,
Syed, I.,
Joshi, V.,
Dahdal, R. Y.,
Gardner, C.,
Risk, M. C.,
Schmidt, L.,
Bavishi, D.,
Kim, K. E.,
Harig, J. M.,
Goldstein, J. L.,
Layden, T. J.,
and Ramaswamy, K.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
271,
G438-G493 61.
Coupaye-Gerard, B.,
Bookstein, C.,
Duncan, P.,
Chen, X. Y.,
Smith, P. R.,
Musch, M.,
Ernst, S. A.,
Chang, E. B.,
and Kleyman, T. R.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
271,
C1639-C1645 62.
Noel, J.,
Roux, D.,
and Pouysségur, J.
(1996)
J. Cell Sci.
109,
929-939[Abstract]
63.
Hoogerwerf, W. A.,
Tsao, S. C.,
Devuyst, O.,
Levine, S. A.,
Yun, C. H.,
Yip, J. W.,
Cohen, M. E.,
Wilson, P. D.,
Lazenby, A. J.,
Tse, C. M.,
and Donowitz, M.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
270,
G29-G41 64.
Sun, A. M.,
Liu, Y.,
Dworkin, L. D.,
Tse, C. M.,
Donowitz, M.,
and Yip, K. P.
(1997)
J. Membr. Biol.
160,
85-90[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
65.
Bookstein, C.,
Xie, Y.,
Rabenau, K.,
Musch, M. W.,
McSwine, R. L.,
Rao, M. C.,
and Chang, E. B.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
273,
C1496-C1505
66.
Borgese, F.,
Sardet, C.,
Cappadoro, M.,
Pouysségur, J.,
and Motais, R.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
6765-6769 67.
Borgese, F.,
Malapert, M.,
Fievet, B.,
Pouysségur, J.,
and Motais, R.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
5431-5435 68.
Cabado, A. G., Yu, F. H.,
Kapus, A.,
Lukacs, G.,
Grinstein, S.,
and Orlowski, J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3590-3599 69.
Wakabayashi, S.,
Fafournoux, P.,
Sardet, C.,
and Pouysségur, J.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
2424-2428 70.
Bertrand, B.,
Wakabayashi, S.,
Ikeda, T.,
Pouysségur, J.,
and Shigekawa, M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
13703-13709 71.
Wakabayashi, S.,
Bertrand, B.,
Ikeda, T.,
Pouysségur, J.,
and Shigekawa, M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
13710-13715 72.
Levine, S. A.,
Nath, S. K.,
Yun, C. H.,
Yip, J. W.,
Montrose, M.,
Donowitz, M.,
and Tse, C. M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
13716-13725 73.
Livne, A. A.,
Sardet, C.,
and Pouysségur, J.
(1991)
FEBS Lett.
284,
219-222[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
74.
Wang, H.,
Silva, N. L.,
Lucchesi, P. A.,
Haworth, R.,
Wang, K.,
Michalak, M.,
Pelech, S.,
and Fliegel, L.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
9151-9158[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
75.
Sardet, C.,
Fafournoux, P.,
and Pouysségur, J.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
19166-19171 76.
Wakabayashi, S.,
Bertrand, B.,
Shigekawa, M.,
Fafournoux, P.,
and Pouysségur, J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
5583-5588 77.
Takahashi, E.,
Abe, J.,
Gallis, B.,
Aebersold, R.,
Spring, D. J.,
Krebs, E. G.,
and Berk, B. C.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
20206-20214 78.
Bianchini, L.,
L'Allemain, G.,
and Pouysségur, J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
271-279 79.
Sahai, E.,
Alberts, A. S.,
and Treisman, R.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
1350-1361[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
80.
Goss, G.,
Orlowski, J.,
and Grinstein, S.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
270,
C1493-C1502 81.
Silva, N. L.,
Haworth, R. S.,
Singh, D.,
and Fliegel, L.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
10412-10420[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
82.
Lin, X.,
and Barber, D. L.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
12631-12636 83.
Grinstein, S.,
Woodside, M.,
Sardet, C.,
Pouysségur, J.,
and Rotin, D.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
23823-23828 84.
Grinstein, S.,
Woodside, M.,
Waddell, T. K.,
Downey, G. P.,
Orlowski, J.,
Pouysségur, J.,
Wong, D. C.,
and Foskett, J. K.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
5209-5218[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
85.
Demaurex, N.,
Romanek, R. R.,
Orlowski, J.,
and Grinstein, S.
(1997)
J. Gen. Physiol.
109,
117-128 86.
Goss, G. G.,
Woodside, M.,
Wakabayashi, S.,
Pouysségur, J.,
Waddell, T.,
Downey, G. P.,
and Grinstein, S.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
8741-8748 87.
D'Souza, S.,
Garcia-Cabado, A., Yu, F.,
Teter, K.,
Lukacs, G.,
Skorecki, K.,
Moore, H. P.,
Orlowski, J.,
and Grinstein, S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
2035-2043 88.
Weinman, E. J.,
and Shenolikar, S.
(1997)
Exp. Nephrol.
5,
449-452[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
89.
Yun, C. H.,
Oh, S.,
Zizak, M.,
Steplock, D.,
Tsao, S.,
Tse, C. M.,
Weinman, E. J.,
and Donowitz, M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
3010-3015 90.
Hall, R. A.,
Premont, R. T.,
Chow, C. W.,
Blitzer, J. T.,
Pitcher, J. A.,
Claing, A.,
Stoffel, R. H.,
Barak, L. S.,
Shenolikar, S.,
Weinman, E. J.,
Grinstein, S.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1998)
Nature
392,
626-630[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
91.
Yun, C. H.,
Lamprecht, G.,
Forster, D. V.,
and Sidor, A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
25856-25863 92.
Kurashima, K., Yu, F. H.,
Cabado, A. G.,
Szabo, E. Z.,
Grinstein, S.,
and Orlowski, J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
28672-28679 93.
Schultheis, P. J.,
Clarke, L. L.,
Meneton, P.,
Miller, M. L.,
Soleimani, M.,
Gawenis, L. R.,
Riddle, T. M.,
Duffy, J. J.,
Doetschman, T.,
Wang, T.,
Giebisch, G.,
Aronson, P. S.,
Lorenz, J. N.,
and Shull, G. E.
(1998)
Nat. Genet.
19,
282-285[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
94.
Cox, G. A.,
Lutz, C. M.,
Yang, C. L.,
Biemesderfer, D.,
Bronson, R. T.,
Fu, A.,
Aronson, P. S.,
Noebels, J. L.,
and Frankel, W. N.
(1997)
Cell
91,
139-148[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
95.
Bell, S. M.,
Schreiner, C. M.,
Schultheis, P. J.,
Miller, M. L.,
Evans, R. L.,
Vorhees, C. V.,
Shull, G. E.,
and Scott, W. J.
(1999)
Am. J. Physiol.
276,
C788-C795
96.
Schultheis, P. J.,
Clarke, L. L.,
Meneton, P.,
Harline, M.,
Boivin, G. P.,
Stemmermann, G.,
Duffy, J. J.,
Doetschman, T.,
Miller, M. L.,
and Shull, G. E.
(1998)
J. Clin. Invest.
101,
1243-1253[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. W. Good, T. George, and B. A. Watts III Nerve Growth Factor Inhibits Na+/H+ Exchange and Formula Absorption through Parallel Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-mTOR and ERK Pathways in Thick Ascending Limb J. Biol. Chem., September 26, 2008; 283(39): 26602 - 26611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Ivanis, A. J. Esbaugh, and S. F. Perry Branchial expression and localization of SLC9A2 and SLC9A3 sodium/hydrogen exchangers and their possible role in acid-base regulation in freshwater rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) J. Exp. Biol., August 1, 2008; 211(15): 2467 - 2477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Segalen, S. L. Longnus, D. Baetz, L. Counillon, and E. Van Obberghen 5-Aminoimidazole-4-Carboxamide-1-{beta}-D-Ribofuranoside Reduces Glucose Uptake via the Inhibition of Na+/H+ Exchanger 1 in Isolated Rat Ventricular Cardiomyocytes Endocrinology, April 1, 2008; 149(4): 1490 - 1498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. D. Johnstone, P. F. Speake, and C. P. Sibley Epidermal growth factor and sphingosine-1-phosphate stimulate Na+/H+ exchanger activity in the human placental syncytiotrophoblast Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): R2290 - R2294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Iwata, Y. Katanosaka, T. Hisamitsu, and S. Wakabayashi Enhanced Na+/H+ Exchange Activity Contributes to the Pathogenesis of Muscular Dystrophy via Involvement of P2 Receptors Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2007; 171(5): 1576 - 1587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kanaan, R. M. Douglas, S. L. Alper, W. F. Boron, and G. G. Haddad Effect of chronic elevated carbon dioxide on the expression of acid-base transporters in the neonatal and adult mouse Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): R1294 - R1302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Matsushita, Y. Sano, S. Yokoyama, T. Takai, H. Inoue, K. Mitsui, K. Todo, H. Ohmori, and H. Kanazawa Loss of calcineurin homologous protein-1 in chicken B lymphoma DT40 cells destabilizes Na+/H+ exchanger isoform-1 protein Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): C246 - C254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Xue, D. Zhou, H. Yao, O. Gavrialov, M. J. McConnell, B. D. Gelb, and G. G. Haddad Novel functional interaction between Na+/H+ exchanger 1 and tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2 Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): R2406 - R2416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Kang'ethe, K. G. Aimanova, A. K. Pullikuth, and S. S. Gill NHE8 mediates amiloride-sensitive Na+/H+ exchange across mosquito Malpighian tubules and catalyzes Na+ and K+ transport in reconstituted proteoliposomes Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): F1501 - F1512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|