Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.R500023200 on November 2, 2005

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 3, 1305-1308, January 20, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
281/3/1305    most recent
R500023200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Di Cera, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Di Cera, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Minireview

A Structural Perspective on Enzymes Activated by Monovalent Cations*

Enrico Di Cera1

From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 K+-activated Type I Enzymes
 K+-activated Type II Enzymes
 Na+-activated Type I Enzymes
 Na+-activated Type II Enzymes
 M+ Selectivity
 Concluding Remarks
 REFERENCES
 
Enzymes activated by monovalent cations are abundantly represented in plants and the animal world. They have evolved to exploit Na+ and K+, readily available in biological environments, as major driving forces for substrate binding and catalysis. Recent progress in the structural biology of such enzymes has answered long standing questions about the molecular mechanism of activation and the origin of monovalent cation selectivity. That enables a simple classification of these functionally diverse enzymes and reveals unanticipated connections with ion transporters.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 K+-activated Type I Enzymes
 K+-activated Type II Enzymes
 Na+-activated Type I Enzymes
 Na+-activated Type II Enzymes
 M+ Selectivity
 Concluding Remarks
 REFERENCES
 
Over 60 years ago, Boyer et al. (1) reported in the pages of this Journal that pyruvate kinase would express appreciable catalytic activity only in the presence of K+. A similar effect was soon discovered in other systems, and just a few decades later the field of enzymes requiring a monovalent cation (M+) for optimal activity encompassed hundreds of examples from plants and the animal world (2, 3). Since the beginning, this rapidly expanding field had to address two basic questions, namely the molecular mechanism of M+ activation and the structural basis of M+ selectivity. Because kinetic investigation would only provide indirect answers, further progress in the field had to await high resolution crystal structures of M+-activated enzymes, which have become available only over the last decade.

A classification of M+-activated enzymes can be based on the selectivity of the effect, as established by kinetic studies, and the mechanism of activation, as shown from structural analysis. The effect has exquisite specificity, with Na+ or K+ being the preferred M+. In general, enzymes requiring K+ such as kinases and molecular chaperones are also activated by Formula and Rb+ but are not activated as well or at all by the larger cation Cs+ or the smaller cations Na+ and Li+. Enzymes requiring Na+ such as beta-galactosidase and clotting proteases are not activated as well by Li+ or the larger cations K+, Rb+, and Cs+. Because the concentration of Na+ and K+ is tightly controlled in vivo, M+s do not function as regulators of enzyme activity. Rather, they provide a driving force for substrate binding and catalysis by lowering energy barriers in the ground and/or transition states. Enzymes activated by M+s evolved to take advantage of the large availability of Na+ outside the cell and K+ inside the cell to optimize their catalytic function. Indeed, a strong correlation exists between the preference for K+ or Na+ and the intracellular or extracellular localization of such enzymes. The mechanism of M+ activation can be established from crystal structures as cofactor-like or allosteric. In the former case, the M+ anchors the substrate to the active site of the enzyme, often acting in tandem with a divalent cation like Mg2+. In such a mechanism of activation, the M+ is absolutely required for catalysis. In the latter, the M+ enhances enzyme activity through conformational transitions triggered upon binding to a site where the M+ makes no direct contact with substrate. In this case, the M+ is not absolutely required for catalysis.

Crystallographic assignment of Na+ or K+ is non-trivial, even for high resolution structures. Na+ has a small ionic radius (0.97 Å) and the same number of electrons as a water molecule. K+ has a higher electron density but an ionic radius (1.33 Å) almost identical to that of a water molecule. Hence, correct assignment of Na+ and K+ must be based on several criteria: the presence of a spherical electron density peak at a {sigma} level in the FoFc map considerably above that of all other water molecules, the number of surrounding oxygens (typically five to seven), and a B value that is comparable with that of neighbor atoms. Additional criteria involve proper O–M+ distances, on the average 2.4 Å for Na+–O and 2.8 Å for K+–O pairs (4), and valence values close to unity (5). Anomalous scattering often provides unequivocal evidence of K+.

Table 1 presents a classification of M+-activated enzymes based on the mechanism of activation identified from structural data and on the M+ requirement established from kinetic studies. In Type I enzymes the M+ functions as a cofactor and the requirement is absolute. In Type II enzymes the M+ functions as an allosteric effector and the requirement is not absolute.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1
Classification of M+-activated enzymes

 

    K+-activated Type I Enzymes
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 K+-activated Type I Enzymes
 K+-activated Type II Enzymes
 Na+-activated Type I Enzymes
 Na+-activated Type II Enzymes
 M+ Selectivity
 Concluding Remarks
 REFERENCES
 
Diol and glycerol dehydratases provide the simplest example of Type I enzymes. K+ is coordinated by five ligands from the protein and acts as a "bait" for the two hydroxyl oxygens from substrate (6, 7). Enzymes involved in phosphoryl transfer reactions were long recognized to be the dominant group among M+ -activated enzymes (2, 3), and this early observation is confirmed by the entries in Table 1. In addition to K+, these enzymes have an absolute requirement for a divalent cation, typically Mg2+ (1, 811). The mechanism of activation involves K+ and Mg2+ acting in tandem to provide optimal docking for the phosphate moiety of substrate into the protein active site to enable nucleophilic attack on the P{gamma} or transfer of phosphate groups. The most revealing example of this strategy comes from the ATP-driven folding machine GroEL, which has the highest K+ affinity (Kd = 80 µM) ever reported for a M+-activated enzyme (9). The crystal structure of GroEL bound to ATP reveals Mg2+ and K+ acting in tandem to assist binding of ATP to the protein (Fig. 1). K+ is coordinated by one P{alpha} oxygen, the backbone oxygens of Thr-30 and Lys-51, and four water molecules (12). Nucleophilic attack on the P{gamma} of ATP is mediated by Asp-52. K+ fixes both groups in place through some of its ligating water molecules and is assisted by Mg2+, which anchors all three P groups of ATP. Branched chain {alpha}-ketoacid dehydrogenase kinase (13) and pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (14) use a similar K+-Mg2+ tandem, whereas the molecular chaperone Hsc70 (15) and the Rad51 recombinase homolog from Methanococcus voltae(16) utilize two K+ in tandem with Mg2+. Other variations are the K+-Zn2+ tandem in pyridoxal kinase (17) and K+ coupled with two Mg2+ in fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (18), S-adenosylmethionine synthase (19), and pyruvate kinase (20).


    K+-activated Type II Enzymes
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 K+-activated Type I Enzymes
 K+-activated Type II Enzymes
 Na+-activated Type I Enzymes
 Na+-activated Type II Enzymes
 M+ Selectivity
 Concluding Remarks
 REFERENCES
 
Some kinases belong to Type II because K+ does not contact ATP directly. In this case, K+ exerts its influence indirectly by perturbing the conformation of active site residues. Ribokinase (21) and aminoimidazole riboside kinase (22) break the K+-Mg2+ tandem by embracing the M+ in a beta-turn adjacent to the active site. In MutL the K+ coordination resembles that of branched chain {alpha}-ketoacid dehydrogenase kinase and pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase except for the fact that the contact with the Pbeta oxygen of ATP is replaced by a water molecule (23). MutL represents an intriguing intermediate between typical Type I kinases and ribokinase that evolved a complete separation of K+ from ATP. Here, one can almost envision a transition between enzymes utilizing K+ as a cofactor into enzymes utilizing K+ as an allosteric effector.

Two K+ binding sites have been identified in branched chain {alpha}-ketoacid dehydrogenase, one controlling the binding of thiamine diphosphate and the other, also found in pyruvate dehydrogenase (24), stabilizing the quaternary structure (25). Dialkylglycine decarboxylase is a beautiful example of M+-dependent molecular switch. In this pyridoxal phosphate (PLP)2-dependent enzyme K+ binds in a loop near the active site (26, 27). Substrate binding requires Tyr-301 to be in the conformation seen in the K+-bound form (Fig. 1). When K+ is replaced by Na+, the activity of the enzyme drops 95% and the change in coordination within the loop causes the O{gamma} of Ser-80 to swing away and clash with the phenyl ring of Tyr-301 that reorients and compromises substrate binding. Likewise, in other PLP-dependent enzymes like Ser hydratase (28), tryptophanase (29), and tyrosinase (30), the K+ binding site makes no contact with substrate but helps organize the architecture of the active site.


    Na+-activated Type I Enzymes
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 K+-activated Type I Enzymes
 K+-activated Type II Enzymes
 Na+-activated Type I Enzymes
 Na+-activated Type II Enzymes
 M+ Selectivity
 Concluding Remarks
 REFERENCES
 
The strategy used by K+-activated Type I kinases to anchor substrate to the active site is also exploited by fructose-1,6-biphosphate aldolase (31) and tagatose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase (32), where the tandem Na+-Zn2+ replaces K+-Mg2+. Tagatose 1,6-bisphosphate is unique in that it replaces a water molecule in the Na+ coordination shell with a cation-{pi} interaction. beta-Galactosidase from Escherichia coli deserves special mention. As the gene product of the lacZ operon, it occupies a most prominent place in the history of molecular biology (33). The activating effect of Na+ and Mg2+ was discovered by Monod in 1951 (34). In this enzyme, the interplay between Na+ and Mg2+ is quite different from the partnership seen in kinases, with Mg2+ binding away from substrate and Na+ being in contact with the galactosyl 6-hydroxyl (Fig. 1) (33, 35). Na+ is coordinated by three protein atoms and two water molecules in the free enzyme, and lactose binding replaces one of the waters in the coordination shell. This change in Na+ coordination triggers a rearrangement of Phe-601, one of the Na+ ligands, to promote substrate binding.


    Na+-activated Type II Enzymes
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 K+-activated Type I Enzymes
 K+-activated Type II Enzymes
 Na+-activated Type I Enzymes
 Na+-activated Type II Enzymes
 M+ Selectivity
 Concluding Remarks
 REFERENCES
 
Among the enzymes involved in PLP catalysis, Trp synthase has been studied extensively both structurally and kinetically (36). The enzyme is peculiar in that it binds Na+ with only slightly higher affinity than K+ (37). The crystal structures of Trp synthase bound to Na+ or K+ show that the M+ makes no contact with substrate or PLP and binds to the beta subunit near the tunnel enabling the indole intermediate to be shuttled to the active site for complexation with L-Ser (38). The tunnel is partially blocked by residues Phe-280 and Tyr-279 in the Na+ form and is more open in the K+ form. Long range allosteric communication in Trp synthase is further demonstrated by the fact that binding to the active site in the {alpha} subunit can displace Na+ from its site in the beta subunit (39).

In the clotting protease thrombin the allosteric effect of Na+ affects a basic mechanism of substrate recognition. Na+ binds close to the primary specificity pocket and orients Asp-189 for correct engagement of the Arg side chain of substrate at the P1 position (Fig. 1), enabling the enzyme to accomplish its procoagulant role in the blood (40). Long range effects induced by Na+ binding propagate through a network of buried water molecules up to the catalytic Ser-195 located 15 Å away (40). A similar architecture of Na+ recognition is observed in clotting factor Xa (41).


    M+ Selectivity
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 K+-activated Type I Enzymes
 K+-activated Type II Enzymes
 Na+-activated Type I Enzymes
 Na+-activated Type II Enzymes
 M+ Selectivity
 Concluding Remarks
 REFERENCES
 
Several M+-activated enzymes have been crystallized free or in the presence of Na+, K+, or other M+, and the resulting information has broadened our understanding of M+ selectivity. In the case of Trp synthase, the changes between the Na+-bound and K+-bound structures are significant (38) but are not matched by differences in the kinetics of activation (36). In pyruvate kinase the replacement of K+ with Na+ results in no structural changes (20) although the enzyme is practically inactive without K+ (1). Future structural studies will hopefully clarify this lack of correlation with function. In thrombin, however, changes in coordination between Na+ and K+ propagate to the oxyanion hole and explain the differences in the kinetics of activation (40, 42). In the case of Dialkylglycine dehydrogenase (26, 27) and Hsc70 (15, 43), replacement of the essential K+ with Na+ changes drastically the geometry of coordination and perturbs residues that control binding of PLP or ATP. These enzymes have evolved K+ selectivity by imposing geometric constraints on the coordination shell that cannot be obeyed by the smaller ionic radius of Na+. The linkage with enzyme activation is ensured by the functional connection of these constraints with the optimal orientation of catalytic residues. Rigidity of the coordination shell guarantees selectivity by increasing the entropic cost of any reorganization meant to accommodate a M+ of different size. Interestingly, an analogous strategy has been exploited successfully in the synthesis of selective chelators (44, 45).


Figure 1
View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1.
Examples of the four classes of M+-activated enzymes (see also Table 1). Shown are substrate (CPK, C in yellow), relevant residues (CPK, C in cyan), K+ or Na+ (yellow ball), and Mg2+ (green ball).

 
Other examples are provided by ion transporters for which M+ selectivity is absolute. The V-type Na+-ATPase (46), the F-type Na+-ATPase (47), and the bacterial Na+/Cl-dependent neurotransmitter homologue (48) cage Na+ in rigid environments, practically inaccessible to K+. In the KcsA K+ channel, the backbone oxygens lining the channel maintain distances suitable only for K+ coordination and provide an exact replica of the coordination shell of K+ in solution (49). One striking feature of the channel is the signature sequence GYG (residues 77–79) whose backbone oxygens shape part of the selectivity filter (Fig. 2). Remarkably, the conformation of this sequence relative to the bound K+ in the channel is very similar to the GYG sequence (residues 325–327) near the K+ binding site of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (14), the GFG sequence (residues 337–339) near the K+ binding site of branched chain {alpha}-ketoacid dehydrogenase kinase (13), and the KYG sequence (residues 224–226) near the Na+ binding site of thrombin (42). Furthermore, mutation of Tyr in this sequence has very similar functional consequences in the K+ channel (50) and thrombin (51). This unexpected connection is a testimony to the basic similarity in the mechanism of M+ recognition that evolution has bestowed on proteins with widely different functions.


Figure 2
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2.
Overlay of the signature sequence GYG (residues 77–79) in the selectivity filter of the KcsA K+ channel (CPK, K+ yellow balls, 1BL8) with the GYG sequence (residues 325–327) of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (magenta, K+ magenta ball, 1Y8P), the GFG sequence (residues 337–339) of branched chain {alpha}-ketoacid dehydrogenase kinase (green, K+ green ball, 1GJV), and the KYG sequence (residues 224–226) of thrombin (wheat, K+ wheat ball, 2A0Q). K+ sits in equivalent positions relative to the sequence in all cases.

 

    Concluding Remarks
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 K+-activated Type I Enzymes
 K+-activated Type II Enzymes
 Na+-activated Type I Enzymes
 Na+-activated Type II Enzymes
 M+ Selectivity
 Concluding Remarks
 REFERENCES
 
The information that emerged from crystal structures of M+-activated enzymes rationalizes decades of kinetic studies and unravels details on the molecular origin of M+ activation and selectivity. A simple classification of these enzymes is now made possible by merging structural and functional data bases. Future studies should explore the intriguing connections between M+-activated enzymes and ion transporters. The enormous amount of knowledge gathered from kinetic and structural studies should facilitate the redesign of M+ specificity and activation (23, 52). A most exciting task would be to introduce M+ activation into proteins devoid of M+ binding, which could benefit many areas of biotechnology and medicine.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* This minireview will be reprinted in the 2006 Minireview Compendium, which will be available in January, 2007. This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Research Grants HL49413, HL58141, and HL73813. Back

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 314-362-4185; Fax: 314-747-5354;E-mail: enrico{at}wustl.edu.

2 The abbreviations used are: PLP, pyridoxal phosphate; CPK, Corey-Pauling-Koltun model. Back


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
I am grateful to Drs. David Davies, Thomas Hurley, Yu Luo, Mischa Machius, Barry Stoddard, Michael Toney, Jimin Wang, and Wei Yang for helpful exchanges of information.



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 K+-activated Type I Enzymes
 K+-activated Type II Enzymes
 Na+-activated Type I Enzymes
 Na+-activated Type II Enzymes
 M+ Selectivity
 Concluding Remarks
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Boyer, P. D., Lardy, H. A., and Phillips, P. H. (1942) J. Biol. Chem. 146, 673–681[Free Full Text]
  2. Suelter, C. H. (1970) Science 168, 789–795[Free Full Text]
  3. Evans, H. J., and Sorger, G. J. (1966) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 17, 847–76
  4. Harding, M. M. (2002) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 58, 872–874[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Nayal, M., and Di Cera, E. (1996) J. Mol. Biol. 256, 228–234[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Shibata, N., Masuda, J., Tobimatsu, T., Toraya, 7, T., Suto, K., Morimoto, Y., and Yasuoka, N. (1999) Structure 7, 997–1008[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Liao, D. I., Dotson, G., Turner, I., Jr., Reiss, L., and Emptage, M. (2003) J. Inorg. Biochem. 93, 84–91[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. O'Brien, M. C., and McKay, D. B. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 2247–2250[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Viitanen, P. V., Lubben, T. H., Reed, J., Goloubinoff, P., O'Keefe, D. P., and Lorimer, G. H. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 5665–5671[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Mudd, S. H., and Cantoni, G. L. (1958) J. Biol. Chem. 231, 481–492[Free Full Text]
  11. Wu, Y., Qian, X., He, Y., Moya, I. A., and Luo, Y. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 722–728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Wang, J., and Boisvert, D. C. (2003) J. Mol. Biol. 327, 843–855[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Machius, M., Chuang, J. L., Wynn, R. M., Tomchick, D. R., and Chuang, D. T. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 11218–11223[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Kato, M., Chuang, J. L., Tso, S. C., Wynn, R. M., and Chuang, D. T. (2005) EMBO J. 24, 1763–1774[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Wilbanks, S. M., and McKay, D. B. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 2251–2257[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Wu, Y., He, Y., Moya, I. A., Qian, X., and Luo, Y. (2004) Mol. Cell 15, 423–435[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Li, M. H., Kwok, F., Chang, W. R., Lau, C. K., Zhang, J. P., Lo, S. C., Jiang, T., and Liang, D. C. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 46385–46390[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Villeret, V., Huang, S., Fromm, H. J., and Lipscomb, W. N. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 8916–8920[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Komoto, J., Yamada, T., Takata, Y., Markham, G. D., and Takusagawa, F. (2004) Biochemistry 43, 1821–1831[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Larsen, T. M., Benning, M. M., Rayment, I., and Reed, G. H. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 6247–6255[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Andersson, C. E., and Mowbray, S. L. (2002) J. Mol. Biol. 315, 409–419[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Zhang, Y., Dougherty, M., Downs, D. M., and Ealick, S. E. (2004) Structure (Camb.) 12, 1809–1821[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Hu, X., Machius, M., and Yang, W. (2003) FEBS Lett. 544, 268–273[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Ciszak, E. M., Korotchkina, L. G., Dominiak, P. M., Sidhu, S., and Patel, M. S. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 21240–21246[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Evarsson, A., Chuang, J. L., Wynn, R. M., Turley, S., Chuang, D. T., and Hol, W. G. (2000) Structure (Camb.) 8, 277–291[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Toney, M. D., Hohenester, E., Cowan, S. W., and Jansonius, J. N. (1993) Science 261, 756–759[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Toney, M. D., Hohenester, E., Keller, J. W., and Jansonius, J. N. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 245, 151–179[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Yamada, T., Komoto, J., Takata, Y., Ogawa, H., Pitot, H. C., and Takusagawa, F. (2003) Biochemistry 42, 12854–12865[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Isupov, M. N., Antson, A. A., Dodson, E. J., Dodson, G. G., Dementieva, I. S., Zakomirdina, L. N., Wilson, K. S., Dauter, Z., Lebedev, A. A., and Harutyunyan, E. H. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 276, 603–623[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Sundararaju, B., Antson, A. A., Phillips, R. S., Demidkina, T. V., Barbolina, M. V., Gollnick, P., Dodson, G. G., and Wilson, K. S. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 6502–6510[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Hall, D. R., Leonard, G. A., Reed, C. D., Watt, C. I., Berry, A., and Hunter, W. N. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 287, 383–394[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Hall, D. R., Bond, C. S., Leonard, G. A., Watt, C. I., Berry, A., and Hunter, W. N. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 22018–22024[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Juers, D. H., Jacobson, R. H., Wigley, D., Zhang, X. J., Huber, R. E., Tronrud, D. E., and Matthews, B. W. (2000) Protein Sci. 9, 1685–1699[Abstract]
  34. Cohn, M., and Monod, J. (1951) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 7, 153–174[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Juers, D. H., Heightman, T. D., Vasella, A., McCarter, J. D., Mackenzie, L., Withers, S. G., and Matthews, B. W. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 14781–14794[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Woehl, E. U., and Dunn, M. F. (1995) Coord. Chem. Rev. 144, 147–197[CrossRef]
  37. Peracchi, A., Mozzarelli, A., and Rossi, G. L. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 9459–9465[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Rhee, S., Parris, K. D., Ahmed, S. A., Miles, E. W., and Davies, D. R. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 4211–4221[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Weyand, M., and Schlichting, I. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 16469–16480[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Pineda, A. O., Carrell, C. J., Bush, L. A., Prasad, S., Caccia, S., Chen, Z.-W., Mathews, F. S., and Di Cera, E. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 31842–31853[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Scharer, K., Morgenthaler, M., Paulini, R., Obst-Sander, U., Banner, D. W., Schlatter, D., Benz, J., Stihle, M., and Diederich, F. (2005) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 44, 4400–4404
  42. Papaconstantinou, M. E., Carrell, C. J., Pineda, A. O., Bobofchak, K. M., Mathews, F. S., Flordellis, C. S., Maragoudakis, M. E., Tsopanoglou, N. E., and Di Cera, E. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 29393–29396[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Flaherty, K. M., DeLuca-Flaherty, C., and McKay, D. B. (1990) Nature 346, 623–628[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Minta, A., and Tsien, R. Y. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 19449–19457[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Cram, D. J. (1988) Science 240, 760–767[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Murata, T., Yamato, I., Kakinuma, Y., Leslie, A. G., and Walker, J. E. (2005) Science 308, 654–659[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Meier, T., Polzer, P., Diederichs, K., Welte, W., and Dimroth, P. (2005) Science 308, 659–662[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Yamashita, A., Singh, S. K., Kawate, T., Jin, Y., and Gouaux, E. (2005) Nature 437, 215–223[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Doyle, D. A., Morais Cabral, J., Pfuetzner, R. A., Kuo, A., Gulbis, J. M., Cohen, S. L., Chait, B. T., and MacKinnon, R. (1998) Science 280, 69–77[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Nakamura, R. L., Anderson, J. A., and Gaber, R. F. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 1011–1018[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Guinto, E. R., Caccia, S., Rose, T., Futterer, K., Waksman, G., and Di Cera, E. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 1852–1857[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Prasad, S., Wright, K. J., Roy, D. B., Bush, L. A., Cantwell, A. M., and Di Cera, E. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100, 13785–13790[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Funahashi, J., Takano, K., Yamagata, Y., and Yutani, K. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 21792–21800[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Lijk, L. J., Torfs, C. A., Kalk, K. H., De Maeyer, M. C., and Hol, W. G. (1984) Eur. J. Biochem. 142, 399–408[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Caradoc-Davies, T. T., Cutfield, S. M., Lamont, I. L., and Cutfield, J. F. (2004) J. Mol. Biol. 337, 337–354[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Greasley, S. E., Horton, P., Ramcharan, J., Beardsley, G. P., Benkovic, S. J., and Wilson, I. A. (2001) Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 402–406[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. DeLaBarre, B., Thompson, P. R., Wright, G. D., and Berghuis, A. M. (2000) Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 238–244[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  58. Premkumar, L., Greenblatt, H. M., Bageshwar, U. K., Savchenko, T., Gokhman, I., Sussman, J. L., and Zamir, A. (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 7493–7498[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Mamat, B., Roth, A., Grimm, C., Ermler, U., Tziatzios, C., Schubert, D., Thauer, R. K., and Shima, S. (2002) Protein Sci. 11, 2168–2178[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Gan, L., Petsko, G. A., and Hedstrom, L. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 13309–13317[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  61. Machius, M., Declerck, N., Huber, R., and Wiegand, G. (1998) Structure 6, 281–292[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  62. Perez-Miller, S. J., and Hurley, T. D. (2003) Biochemistry 42, 7100–7109[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  63. Holyoak, T., Kettner, C. A., Petsko, G. A., Fuller, R. S., and Ringe, D. (2004) Biochemistry 43, 2412–2421[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. S. Gandhi, Z. Chen, F. S. Mathews, and E. Di Cera
Structural identification of the pathway of long-range communication in an allosteric enzyme
PNAS, February 12, 2008; 105(6): 1832 - 1837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. A. Bush-Pelc, F. Marino, Z. Chen, A. O. Pineda, F. S. Mathews, and E. Di Cera
Important Role of the Cys-191 Cys-220 Disulfide Bond in Thrombin Function and Allostery
J. Biol. Chem., September 14, 2007; 282(37): 27165 - 27170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Y. C. Wong, D. M. MacLean, and D. Bowie
Na+/Cl- Dipole Couples Agonist Binding to Kainate Receptor Activation
J. Neurosci., June 20, 2007; 27(25): 6800 - 6809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
F. Marino, Z.-W. Chen, C. E. Ergenekan, L. A. Bush-Pelc, F. S. Mathews, and E. Di Cera
Structural Basis of Na+ Activation Mimicry in Murine Thrombin
J. Biol. Chem., June 1, 2007; 282(22): 16355 - 16361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Bah, L. C. Garvey, J. Ge, and E. Di Cera
Rapid Kinetics of Na+ Binding to Thrombin
J. Biol. Chem., December 29, 2006; 281(52): 40049 - 40056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. J. Buch-Pedersen, E. L. Rudashevskaya, T. S. Berner, K. Venema, and M. G. Palmgren
Potassium as an Intrinsic Uncoupler of the Plasma Membrane H+-ATPase
J. Biol. Chem., December 15, 2006; 281(50): 38285 - 38292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. O. Pineda, Z.-W. Chen, A. Bah, L. C. Garvey, F. S. Mathews, and E. Di Cera
Crystal Structure of Thrombin in a Self-inhibited Conformation
J. Biol. Chem., October 27, 2006; 281(43): 32922 - 32928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Oria-Hernandez, H. Riveros-Rosas, and L. Ramirez-Silva
Dichotomic Phylogenetic Tree of the Pyruvate Kinase Family: K+-DEPENDENT AND -INDEPENDENT ENZYMES
J. Biol. Chem., October 13, 2006; 281(41): 30717 - 30724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. L. Renart, F. N. Barrera, M. L. Molina, J. A. Encinar, J. A. Poveda, A. M. Fernandez, J. Gomez, and J. M. Gonzalez-Ros
Effects of Conducting and Blocking Ions on the Structure and Stability of the Potassium Channel KcsA
J. Biol. Chem., October 6, 2006; 281(40): 29905 - 29915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
M. J. Page and E. Di Cera
Role of na+ and k+ in enzyme function.
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2006; 86(4): 1049 - 1092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. A. Bush, R. W. Nelson, and E. Di Cera
Murine Thrombin Lacks Na+ Activation but Retains High Catalytic Activity
J. Biol. Chem., March 17, 2006; 281(11): 7183 - 7188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
281/3/1305    most recent
R500023200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow