|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 3, 1605-1611, January 20, 2006
Direct Comparison of a Stable Isolated Hsp70 Substrate-binding Domain in the Empty and Substrate-bound States*
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-helical lid relative to the
-subdomain. Significantly, we have shown that the chemical shifts of the substrate-binding domain and the ATPase domain do not change when they are placed together in a two-domain construct, whether or not peptide is bound, suggesting that, in the absence of nucleotide, the two domains of E. coli DnaK do not interact. We conclude that the isolated substrate-binding domain exists in a stable high affinity state in the absence of influence from a nucleotide-bound ATPase domain. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Hsp70 ATPase domain shares structural similarity with actin and binds nucleotide in a deep cleft between two large lobes (8, 9). A short well conserved linker connects the ATPase domain with the SBD, which itself consists of a
-subdomain capped by an
-helical lid subdomain, as observed in an x-ray crystal structure of DnaK-(389-607) bound to a peptide (Fig. 1A) (10). The substrate peptide NR (sequence NRLLLTG) is nestled between loops of the distorted
-sandwich in an extended conformation (11) and is encapsulated by the
-helical lid subdomain, which extends over the top of the peptide-binding pocket, but does not directly contact the peptide. Based on observation of a kink in the
-helical lid in one crystalline form of the peptide-bound SBD, it was proposed that ATP binding could cause the
-helical lid to move away from the
-subdomain (10). However, it is now clear that, although such a conformational change in the helix may indeed occur, the
-helical lid itself is dispensable for the ATP-induced switch of the
-subdomain to the low affinity conformation (3, 5, 6, 12-14), and therefore more extensive structural changes must occur throughout the
-subdomain.
Insight into this change in conformation plus the role of peptide in allostery should be aided by structures of the SBD with and without bound substrate. However, structures of the empty conformation of the SBD have been difficult to obtain because of the strong tendency of the domain to bind any available hydrophobic sequence. In NMR structures of truncated SBDs of DnaK and Hsc70, in which three C-terminal helices were removed (corresponding to DnaK residues 386-561 and Hsc70-(383-540)) (15, 16), leucine residues near the new C terminus bound intramolecularly into the peptide-binding pocket. A subsequent structure of the isolated
-subdomain (DnaK residues 393-507) in the empty conformation revealed a highly flexible structure with a major conformational change in strand
3 at the edge of one sheet (14). The dynamic nature of the empty
-subdomain and its low affinity for NR peptide (Kd value of 0.6 mM) indicated that the isolated subdomain might favor the low affinity conformation. However, this fragment was later reported to exist as a dimer in the empty conformation, and thus it is not clear at this time which conformational changes might be due to dimer formation and which due to loss of peptide (17).
Here we demonstrate that, contrary to the reported behavior of the isolated
-subdomain, a DnaK SBD fragment retaining a portion of the
-helical subdomain but harboring mutations that abrogate self-binding was well folded and stable in the empty state and bound peptides with high affinity. The structural and dynamic changes in the empty state relative to the peptide-bound form were small and local and reported on conformational rearrangement of the peptide-binding pocket and repacking of the helix against the
-subdomain. When this stable SBD and the native ATPase domain were linked in a two-domain construct, the protein was allosterically functional. Strikingly, however, NMR spectra of the two-domain construct without nucleotide present indicated that the two domains do not interact, even in the presence of peptide. These results have demonstrated that nucleotide is necessary to establish allosteric signaling between the domains.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Protein PurificationConstructs containing the ATPase domain were transformed into the DnaK-deficient BB1553 strain of E. coli, grown at 30 °C, and induced either by the addition of 0.4 mM isopropyl 1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside or heat shock at 42 °C, depending on the promoter, and purified as described previously (18) with a minor modification. In the ATP-agarose used in this study, the N6 atom of ATP was linked to agarose instead of the C8 atom (Sigma catalog number A9264). DnaK can be eluted from this column using EDTA instead of excess ATP, resulting in completely nucleotide-free protein. Briefly, soluble protein extracts were loaded on DEAE-Sepharose equilibrated in 20 mM HEPES, 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4, and eluted using a continuous gradient to 500 mM KCl. Peak fractions were pooled, brought to 10 mM MgCl2, and then loaded on the ATP-agarose column pre-equilibrated in 20 mM HEPES, 5 mM MgCl2, and 100 mM KCl, pH 7.6 (HMK buffer). The column was washed with HMK plus 2 M KCl and the protein was eluted in 20 mM HEPES, 10 mM EDTA, 100 mM KCl, pH 7.6. Pooled peak fractions were concentrated in an Amicon ultrafiltration cell (Millipore, Billerica, MA), dialyzed against HMK buffer, and stored at -80 °C. The 260/280 nm absorption ratio of protein prepared in this way was always <0.6, indicating that the protein is nucleotide-free (19).
His-tagged SBD constructs were expressed in the BL21(DE3) strain of E. coli grown at 30 °C to an A600 of 1 and then induced at 42 °C for 5 h. Soluble extracts prepared by lysozyme treatment, sonication, and removal of cell debris by centrifugation were applied to a Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid resin (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) pre-equilibrated in 50 mM sodium phosphate, 0.5 M NaCl, pH 8 (buffer A), and eluted using a gradient to 200 mM imidazole in buffer A. Peak fractions were pooled, concentrated in an Amicon ultrafiltration cell, and dialyzed against 20 mM sodium phosphate, 25 mM NaCl, pH 7 (buffer B). For H6DnaK-(387-552)-ye, roughly half of the protein is expressed in inclusion bodies; therefore in this case, protein was also purified from the pellet by solubilizing in 8 M urea in buffer A, after which it was sonicated, centrifuged, and chromatographed on Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid resin as above but with 8 M urea incorporated in all buffers. Peak fractions were concentrated by ultrafiltration, refolded by dropwise dilution into a 20-fold excess of buffer B with rapid stirring, concentrated again, and dialyzed against buffer B before storage at -80 °C. Protein purified from the soluble fraction and the refolded protein gave identical TROSY NMR spectra.
Preparation of NMR SamplesProteins were labeled with 15N or 15N/13C by growth in M9 minimal medium supplemented with [15N]ammonium chloride and [13C]glucose. Purified and concentrated protein was buffer-exchanged in a Centricon-10 concentrator (Millipore, Billerica, MA) into NMR buffers as follows: for SBD-only constructs, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 10 mM sodium acetate, 10% D2O and 0.02% sodium azide; for ATPase-domain-containing constructs, 10 mM potassium phosphate, 10 mM potassium chloride, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM (d6)
-mercaptoethanol, 10% D2O and 0.02% sodium azide. All NMR buffers were pH 7 and contained 0.5 mM 3-(trimethylsilyl) propane sulfonic acid as an internal standard.
NMR Sequential AssignmentsThe backbone NMR resonance assignments of H6DnaK-(387-552)-ye in the empty and NR-bound states were obtained using 0.7 mM labeled protein samples with and without 0.8 mM NR peptide on a Bruker Avance 600 spectrometer. A combination of HNCA, HN(CO)CA, CBCA(CO)NH, HNCACB, HNCO, and HN(CA)CO experiments using 13C/15N-labeled protein and 1H,15N-NOESY/TROSY and 1H,15N-TOCSY/TROSY experiments collected on 15N-only samples (80- and 50-ms mixing times, respectively) was used to complete the assignments (20, 21). The programs Felix 2000 (Accelrys, Inc, San Diego, CA) and Xeasy (22) were used for spectral processing and data analysis, respectively. 98% of non-proline backbone resonances were assigned in this manner. Weighted average chemical shift changes (
avg) were calculated as described in Ref. 14.
NMR Hydrogen ExchangeHydrogen-deuterium exchange was initiated by resuspending samples of 0.3 mM [15N]H6DnaK-(387-552)-ye that had been lyophilized with and without 0.7 mM NR peptide into 100% D2O NMR buffer. Peak volumes were plotted versus time and fit to a single exponential decay. Protection factors were calculated relative to the sequence-specific intrinsic exchange rates of Bai et al. (23).
Peptide Synthesis and PurificationPeptides p5 (CLLLSAPRR) and NR (NRLLLTG) were synthesized on a Pioneer automated peptide synthesizer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), purified to homogeneity by high pressure liquid chromatography, and verified by mass spectrometry.
ATPase AssaysSingle turnover ATPase rates were measured by following the recovery of the fluorescence intensity of Trp-102 after the addition of substoichiometric amounts of ATP (19, 24), using 1 µM protein and 0.5 µM ATP at 25 °C in HMK buffer. Fluorescence measurements were made on an Alpha Scan Fluorometer (Photon Technology International, Birmingham, NJ) with excitation at 295 nm, emission at 340 nm, and excitation and emission slits set at 2 and 5 nm, respectively. Shutters were gated closed between data points to avoid photobleaching over the course of the experiment. Recovery curves were fit to a single exponential. Peptide-stimulated rates were measured by adding ATP after a 15' preincubation of protein with 30 µM p5 peptide.
Fluorescence MeasurementsThe ATP-induced blue shift of Trp-102 was monitored with emission wavelength scans from 305-405 nm upon excitation at 295 nm (25 °C). Excitation slits were 2 nm and emission slits were 5 nm. Protein concentration was 1 µM in HMK buffer, ±0.5 mM ATP.
Phage Replication AssaysThese assays followed established protocols (18).
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-helical lid were deleted, corresponding to H6DnaK-(387-552), which was generously provided by Dr. Roger McMacken (Johns Hopkins University) (Fig. 1B). However, peptide titration monitored by NMR demonstrated that this fragment had extremely low affinity for substrates (data not shown) and had nearly identical chemical shifts to a slightly less truncated version of the DnaK SBD, where C-terminal tail residues occupied the substrate-binding pocket intramolecularly (16, 25). Interestingly, when this truncated domain was connected to the ATPase domain in cis (corresponding to DnaK-(1-552), Fig. 1B), the single turnover ATPase rate was 10-fold higher than that of full-length DnaK, and it was not stimulated in the presence of 30 µM p5 peptide (Fig. 2), consistent with the interpretation that the C terminus of the SBD fragment was occupying the binding pocket in an entropically favored interaction.
In the NMR structure of DnaK-(386-561) by Wang et al. (16), two adjacent leucine residues at positions 542 and 543 were bound intramolecularly by the substrate-binding pocket, presumably due to deletion of the
-helical bundle into which these leucines normally pack (Fig. 1A) (10). In previous work, we destabilized the binding of the C-terminal tail by shifting to lower pH, presumably causing protonation of the histidines that flank these two leucine residues, but we were only able to populate the unbound conformation to a small degree (10-20%) (25). Therefore, in the present work, we mutated these residues to tyrosine and glutamate (L542Y/L543E) to fully destabilize this apparently non-physiological interaction with the binding site and to observe the empty conformation of the SBD.
|
Furthermore, unlike H6DnaK-(387-552), in which NR titration at low pH shifted a pre-existing equilibrium between tail-bound and tail-free conformations and resulted in large chemical shift changes for 542 and 543 (25), titration of NR into H6DnaK-(387-552)-ye had no effect on these resonances, indicating that the mutation blocks binding of the C-terminal tail completely (see supplemental data). Importantly, in the context of the two-domain protein DnaK-(1-552)-ye, the same mutations restored a wild-type level of basal ATP hydrolysis, which was stimulated 7-fold by 30 µM p5 (Fig. 2), further supporting the interpretation that the binding pocket was empty.
DnaK-(1-552)-ye Was Allosterically Functional in Vitro and in VivoEncouraged by the fact that the ATPase rate of DnaK-(1-552)-ye was stimulated by peptide nearly as much as full-length DnaK, we next questioned whether other allosteric properties were preserved. In full-length DnaK, the ATP-induced conformational change to the low affinity state can be monitored via the fluorescence of the single tryptophan (Trp-102) in the ATPase domain. In the presence of ATP, Trp-102 is quenched, blue-shifted, and protected from solvent by a mechanism that relies on the presence of a portion of the helical lid subdomain of the SBD (3, 5). Thus, the changes in Trp-102 fluorescence report on ATP-dependent allosteric communication with the SBD. As seen in Fig. 4, the tryptophan fluorescence in DnaK-(1-552)-ye exhibited the same
25% quench and 4-nm blue-shift with ATP binding as in wild-type DnaK. Thus the mutant domain retained all the hallmarks of allostery in DnaK, ATP-induced conformational change to the low affinity state and substrate-induced activation of ATP catalysis. Because these in vitro tests showed DnaK-(1-552)-ye to behave similar to the wild-type protein, we also tested its ability to support replication of bacteriophage
in vivo. DnaK-(1-552)-ye consistently gave about two-thirds the number of plaques as the wild-type protein, showing that it could substitute for wild-type DnaK in vivo (see supplemental data). Based on these data, which showed the truncated modified SBD to be functional in the context of a two-domain construct, we proceeded to characterize the impact of substrate binding to the isolated SBD using NMR.
|
|
-subdomain (14). However, contrary to that study, in which substantial regions of the empty SBD were broadened beyond detection by conformational exchange, we were able to observe and assign all but three non-proline residues in both states of H6DnaK-(387-552)-ye using 13C/15N-labeled protein and standard methods (see supplemental data).
Based on sequential nuclear Overhauser effects (data not shown), chemical shift indices (see supplemental data), and patterns of hydrogen bonding (Fig. 5), we determined that H6DnaK-(387-552)-ye had the same overall structure as the crystal structure of NR-bound DnaK-(389-607), at least up to residue 537 (10). Therefore, we can discuss chemical shift differences between the NR-bound and empty states in terms of this crystal structure. The chemical shift changes between the NR-bound and empty states were largely local to the crystallographically defined binding pocket (10) and indicated modest remodeling of the hydrophobic binding pocket in the empty state (Fig. 3B). Specifically, most of the large to moderate chemical shift changes were contained within loops L1,2 and L3,4 and the ensuing strand
4, all of which flank the peptide-binding pocket. Intriguingly, however, there was also evidence of a change in the way the helix packed against the
-subdomain in the empty state, as the helix residues that face the
-subdomain in the NR-bound crystal structure (10) exhibited small to moderate weighted average chemical shift changes relative to the NR-bound state (
avg 0.01-0.025 ppm, calculated as in (14)). Importantly, these data are not consistent with a conformational change in edge strand
3 between the empty and peptide-bound states, such as that observed in the previously reported isolated
-subdomain (14). Aside from Ser-427, which hydrogen bonds to NR in the NR-bound crystal structure and was therefore expected to have a large peak shift, the largest weighted average chemical shift change (
avg) in strand
3 was 0.027 ppm for residue Ser-423, and all other
3 residues had 
avg values of 0.013 ppm or less. In contrast, in the isolated
-subdomain, 
avg increased along the strand to
0.16 ppm for Ser-423, and the C-terminal residues of the strand were exchange-broadened beyond detection.
|
3 exhibited an alternating pattern of hydrogen exchange protection in the empty state, as expected for the edge strand of a
-sheet (Fig. 5B, top panel) (28). Similar to the chemical shift data, this result is inconsistent with the behavior of this strand in the
-subdomain-only structure, in which the C-terminal half was detached from the rest of the
-sheet in the empty state (14). The Two Domains of DnaK-(1-552)-ye Do Not Interact in the Absence of NucleotideWe reasoned that the SBD in isolation might behave differently than when it is linked to or interacting with the ATPase domain. Therefore, we used TROSY NMR to determine whether the conformation of the isolated substrate-binding domain is relevant to its conformation in the context of the ATPase domain. Provocatively, the TROSY spectrum of the DnaK-(1-552)-ye protein overlaid nearly perfectly with those of the isolated ATPase domain and SBD (DnaK-(1-388) and H6DnaK-(387-552)-ye, respectively; Fig. 6), indicating that there was very little interaction between the two domains. The same was true even when the SBD binding pocket was saturated with NR peptide; the spectrum of the NR-bound two-domain construct overlaid with those of the isolated ATPase domain and the isolated NR-bound SBD (data not shown). Apparently, nucleotide must be present in order for stable domain docking to occur. Taken altogether, these data argued strongly that DnaK-(1-552)-ye was a functional protein and that residues 387-552 assumed the same conformation in isolation as they did when the ATPase domain was present.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-subdomain. This characterization of the empty state of H6DnaK-(387-552)-ye is at odds with an earlier study of an isolated
-subdomain, which was truncated at residue 507 (Fig. 1A) and therefore lacked all of the
-helix (14). In this smaller construct, many residues in the empty state were broadened beyond detection by conformational exchange, the C-terminal half of strand
3 detached from its sheet to move into the peptide-binding pocket, and the affinity for peptide was extremely low (Kd of 0.6 mM for NR). We conclude that the structure of the isolated
-subdomain was compromised either by removal of the entire
-helical subdomain or the fact that it existed as a dimer in the empty state (17). When we looked at our modified SBD in a two-domain construct that included the ATPase domain (i.e. DnaK-(1-552)-ye), the typical indicators of DnaK allostery were preserved, a low basal ATPase rate that was stimulated by peptide and an ATP-induced blue shift of Trp-102 that reported on the conversion of the SBD to the low affinity state. This was not an unexpected result, as many studies have reported wild-type function of slightly shorter fragments of DnaK and BiP that end near residue 538 (DnaK numbering) (3, 5, 6, 12, 30).
One of the most striking conclusions from this work, however, stems from the fact that the TROSY NMR spectrum of DnaK-(1-552)-ye overlaid nearly perfectly with the spectra of the ATPase and SBD domains in isolation, arguing that the two domains acted independently when they were linked, whether or not peptide was bound. We conclude that nucleotide must be bound in order for the two domains to dock. One might question the physiological significance of the no-nucleotide state of DnaK, but in fact, our more recent results have demonstrated that, even in the presence of ADP, the two domains do not interact; only ATP can induce a docked conformation.4 This behavior is consistent with a host of biochemical evidence that shows the ADP-bound and no-nucleotide states of DnaK to be very similar, with only ATP causing interdomain effects (3, 5, 31, 32). However, this result is in contrast to a recent NMR report of domain docking in both ADP- and ATP-bound states of a two-domain construct of Thermus thermophilus DnaK that lacked the entire
-helical lid of the SBD (corresponding to 1-507 in E. coli DnaK numbering) (33). The reasons for this difference are not yet clear, but we speculate that the T. thermophilus construct was predisposed to a low affinity conformation because of mutations/deletions in the peptide binding pocket and/or removal of the entire
-helical lid subdomain. Based on the biochemical measures of two-way allostery, which showed peptide binding influencing the activity of the ATPase domain, we expected peptide binding to the SBD to cause a ripple of conformational changes propagating into the ATPase domain. On the contrary, however, peptide binding to the nucleotide-free two-domain construct only caused very local intradomain effects, and there was no evidence for chemical shift changes at residue Lys-414 or in the linker VLLL sequence, both of which have been shown by mutagenesis to be essential to this allosteric mechanism (Fig. 1A) (18, 34). Importantly, every assay we are aware of that shows peptide binding causing an effect in the ATPase domain is (necessarily) conducted in the presence of ATP (35-37). Therefore, we hypothesize that an interface with the ATP-bound ATPase domain is also required for propagation of an allosteric signal from peptide binding to the ATPase domain. We intend to pursue these intriguing observations by identifying functional docking interfaces through evolutionary conservation of interdomain thermodynamic couplings5 and continued study by NMR.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Figs. 1-3 (including chemical shift assignments, chemical shift indices, and
phage propagation assays). ![]()
1 Present address: Abteilung Zelluläre Signalverarbeitung, Forschungsinstitut für Molekulare Pharmakologie, Robert-Rössle-Strasse 10, D-13125 Berlin, Germany. ![]()
2 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Massachusetts, 913G LGRT, 710 N. Pleasant St., Amherst, MA 01003. Tel.: 413-545-6094; Fax: 413-545-1289; E-mail: gierasch{at}biochem.umass.edu.
3 The abbreviations used are: SBD, substrate-binding domain; TROSY, transverse relaxation-optimized spectroscopy; NOESY, nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy; TOCSY, total correlation spectroscopy; ppm, parts/million. ![]()
4 J. F. Swain and L. M. Gierasch, manuscript in preparation. ![]()
5 R. G. Smock, J. F. Swain, W. P. Russ, R. Ranganathan and L. M. Gierasch, submitted for publication. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||