|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 42, 31245-31253, October 20, 2006
Transcription Factor Activating Enhancer-binding Protein-2
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(AP-2
) transcription factor gene and type 2 diabetes. This gene is preferentially expressed in adipose tissue, and subjects with the disease-susceptible allele of AP-2
showed stronger expression in adipose tissue than those without the susceptible allele. Furthermore, overexpression of AP-2
leads to lipid accumulation by enhancing glucose transport and inducing insulin resistance in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. In this study we demonstrated that overexpression of AP-2
in 3T3-L1 adipocytes decreased the expression and secretion of adiponectin and increased those of interleukin-6 (IL-6). Interestingly, the effects of AP-2
on the expressions of adiponectin and IL-6 and the mechanisms by which AP-2
modulated their expressions were different. We found that the promoter activity of adiponectin gene was inhibited by AP-2
overexpression and enhanced by knockdown of endogenous AP-2
, whereas IL-6 was unaffected. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays revealed the existence of putative responsive elements for AP-2
and NF-YA in human and mouse adiponectin promoter regions, and mutation of this AP-2
binding site abolished the inhibitory effect of AP-2
. Furthermore, chromatin immunoprecipitation assays demonstrated that AP-2
and NF-YA competitively bind to the same region of the adiponectin promoter. Our results clearly demonstrated that AP-2
directly inhibits adiponectin gene expression by displacing NF-YA and binding to its promoter. We conclude that AP-2
might modulate the expression of adiponectin by directly inhibiting its transcriptional activity. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
transcription factor gene (TFAP2B) located on chromosome 6p12 as a susceptibility gene for type 2 diabetes in a genome-wide association study (1). Several variations in the TFAP2B gene were significantly associated with obese type 2 diabetes in Japanese and British individuals (1). We also demonstrated that AP-2
is preferentially expressed in human adipose tissue and that its expression is increased during adipocyte differentiation in mouse 3T3-L1 adipocytes (1). Moreover, polymorphism in the first intron of TFAP2B directly affects the transcriptional activity of the gene (2), and subjects with the disease-susceptible allele have stronger expression of AP-2
in their adipose tissue than those without the susceptible allele. Recently we also found that overexpression of AP-2
leads to lipid accumulation by enhancing glucose transport, thereby inducing insulin resistance in 3T3-L1 adipocytes (3). These results suggest that TFAP2B is important in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes through the dysregulation of adipocyte function and that polymorphisms in TFAP2B affect expression of the gene, which thus, confers disease susceptibility.
Adipose tissue is an important source of metabolically active secretory factors, including free fatty acids, leptin, tumor necrosis factor-
, interleukin-6 (IL-6),2 monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, resistin, visfatin, and adiponectin (4). Although small adipocytes secrete insulin-sensitizing hormones such as adiponectin, hypertrophied adipocytes exhibit lower expression levels of these factors and high levels of insulin-resistant hormones such as tumor necrosis factor-
and IL-6, resulting in the insulin resistance observed in obesity (5). These phenomena are considered to have crucial roles in the pathogenesis of obesity-related diseases such as metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes.
Adiponectin has anti-diabetic (611) and anti-atherogenic (1217) properties. Plasma concentrations of adiponectin are low in obesity, diabetes (12), and ischemic heart disease (12, 13). Several factors regulate adiponectin gene expression including other adipocytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-
(10) and IL-6 (18), transcription factors such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
, liver receptor homolog-1 (19, 20), CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP), nuclear transcription factor-Y (NF-Y) (21), and sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c (22). Although fat accumulation in the body seems to be the most powerful modulator of adiponectin expression, the molecular mechanism underlying this is largely unknown.
In this study, we demonstrated that overexpression of AP-2
in 3T3-L1 adipocytes decreased both the expression and secretion of adiponectin and increased those of IL-6. We found that the effects of AP-2
on the expression of adiponectin and IL-6 and the mechanisms by which AP-2
modulate their expressions were different. We herein demonstrated that AP-2
directly inhibits adiponectin gene expression by binding to its gene promoter and displacing NF-Y, subunit A (NF-YA). We concluded that AP-2
might modulate the expression of adiponectin by directly inhibiting its transcriptional activity.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
antibody (H-87), anti-Acrp30 antibody (A-13), anti-IL-6 antibody (M-19), anti-CCAAT-binding transcription factor (CBF)-B antibody (G-2), C/EBP consensus oligonucleotide (sc-2525), CBF gel shift oligonucleotide (sc-2591), AP-2 consensus oligonucleotide (sc-2513), horseradish peroxidase-linked anti-rabbit, and anti-goat antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). The pGL3-Basic luciferase vector and phRL-null vector were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI), and the piGENE mU6 vector was purchased from iGENE (Ibaragi, Japan) and TaKaRa BIO (Shiga, Japan). Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and fetal calf serum were obtained from Invitrogen. All radioisotopes were obtained from ICN (Costa Mesa, CA). BioMax MR film was obtained from Eastman Kodak Co. (Rochester, NY). All other reagents and chemicals were from standard suppliers. Cell Culture3T3-L1 cells, which were provided by Dr. J. M. Olefsky (University of California, San Diego, CA), were cultured and differentiated into adipocytes as described previously (23). Before each experiment, the adipocytes were trypsinized and reseeded in appropriate culture dishes. The Ad-E1A-transformed human embryonic kidney cell line, 293 cells, was cultured as described previously (24).
Preparation of Recombinant AdenovirusAdenovirus vector encoding the human AP-2
gene (Ad5-AP-2
) was generated as described previously (3). Adenovirus encoding the LacZ gene (Ad5-LacZ), as described previously (25), was used for the control.
Preparation of Expression Plasmid VectorsPlasmid vector encoding the mouse AP-2
gene (pcDNA3.1/AP-2
) and mutant AP-2
that lacks DNA binding ability (pcDNA3.1/AP-2
R225C) were generated as described previously (3). Mouse NF-YA was cloned and inserted into pcDNA3.1 to generate the expression vector for mouse pcDNA3.1 (pcDNA3.1/NF-YA).
InfectionTen days after induction of differentiation, 3T3-L1 adipocytes were infected with adenoviruses at the indicated multiplicity of infection for 24 h. Transfected cells were incubated for 48 h at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 10% CO2 in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 22.5 mM glucose and 2% heat-inactivated serum followed by serum starvation as required for the assay.
Nuclear ExtractionNuclear extracts were prepared as described previously (26). Briefly, cells were rinsed twice with phosphate-buffered saline and then lightly trypsinized and pelleted by centrifugation at 650 x g for 5 min. The pellet was washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline, then suspended in lysis buffer A (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 µM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2 µM sodium vanadate (Na3VO4), 2 µM leupeptin, 1 µM aprotinin, and 1 µM pepstatin). The cell suspension was homogenized, and nuclei were pelleted by centrifugation at 8000 x g for 5 min. The pellet was resuspended in buffer C (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.42 mM KCl, 20% glycerol, 1.5 mM MgCl2, Na3VO4, dithiothreitol, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, leupeptin, aprotinin, and pepstatin at concentrations used for buffer A). The lysate was rotated for 30 min at 4 °C and centrifuged at 15,000 x g for 30 min.
Western BlottingCells were lysed in a solubilizing buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, 140 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 50 units/ml of aprotinin, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 50 mM NaF, pH 7.5, for 30 min at 4 °C. Whole cell lysates were denatured by boiling in Laemmli sample buffer containing 100 mM dithiothreitol and resolved by SDS-PAGE, then electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Immobilon-P; Millipore, Bedford, MA). The specific proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence.
Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent AssayConditioned media were collected from 3T3-L1 adipocyte cultures. The levels of adiponectin were determined using a mouse/rat adiponectin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Otsuka, Tokyo, Japan).
Transfection StudyCell transfection was performed using the Amaxa Nucleofector technology (Amaxa, Cologne, Germany) as described previously (3). Briefly, on day 5 after induction of differentiation, the cell suspension was mixed with 5 µg of luciferase reporter vector and phRL-null with various expression vectors or small interfering RNA (siRNAs) and electroporated using the program U-28. After transfection, cells were immediately transferred to 1 ml of growth medium and cultured for reporter assays, quantitative reverse transcription (RT)-PCR, and Western blotting.
RNA Preparation from Adipocytes and Quantitative RT-PCRTotal RNA was isolated with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). RT-PCR reactions were performed using the reverse transcription reagent (TaKaRa BIO). Real-time PCR was performed on a LightCycler machine (Roche Applied Science) using Light-Cycler-FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green I. Primer sets were as follows: mouse AP-2
, 5'-GCGTCCTCAGAAGAGCCAAATC-3' and 5'-GTGCGTGATGAGACTGAAGTGC-3'; mouse adiponectin, 5'-GAAGATGACGTTACTACAAC-3' and 5'-TCAGTTGGTATCATGGAAGA-3'; mouse IL-6, 5'-ACAACCACGGCCTTCCCTACTT-3' and 5'-CACGATTTCCCAGAGAACATGTG-3'; mouse
-actin, 5'-CGTGCGTGACATCAAAGAGAA-3' and 5'-TGGATGCCACAGGATTCCAT-3'.
Measurement of Luciferase Reporter Gene ActivityThe luciferase reporter plasmid for human adiponectin promoter expression (pGL3/adiponectin promoter luc) was kindly provided by Dr. Iichiro Shimomura (Osaka University, Osaka, Japan) (20). The luciferase reporter plasmid for mouse IL-6 promoter expression (pGL3/IL-6 promoter luc) was generated by excising the promoter fragment (1819/+70) from the genomic clone of IL-6 and inserting it into the MluI and BglII sites of the pGL3-Basic luciferase vector. Luciferase activities were measured using the dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega) using the protocol provided by the manufacturer. Luciferase values of phRL-null were measured for normalization.
|
antibody (H-87X), respectively.
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) AssayThe ChIP assay protocol described by Latasa et al. (27) was used with some modification. Briefly,
1 x 106 differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes were cross-linked for 10 min by adding formaldehyde directly to the tissue culture medium to a final concentration of 1%. Cross-linking was stopped by the addition of glycine to a final concentration of 0.125 M. Cross-linked cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline and scraped. Nuclei were pelleted by centrifugation and resuspended in SDS lysis buffer. The chromatin solution was sonicated for 10-s pulses at maximum power. After centrifugation, the supernatant was divided into aliquots for 10-fold dilution in ChIP dilution buffer and precleared with protein G-agarose containing salmon sperm DNA for 1 h. The antibodies were added and incubated for 18 h at 4 °C followed by incubation with protein G-agarose for 3 h. The precipitates were washed, and chromatin complexes were eluted. After reversal of the cross-linking, the DNA was purified, and 5 µg of input control or ChIP samples were used as a template for PCR using the primer sets for regions containing the candidate AP-2 responsive elements. The sequences of primers used for ChIP assay were as follows: 5'-AGAAGCTCTACTTGGCTTCCC-3' and 5'-GCAGACCCCAGCTTACCA-3'.
Generation of Mutant Adiponectin PromoterA QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) was used for mutagenesis. The putative AP-2 binding site in the proximal promoter region of the human adiponectin gene was mutated using the oligonucleotides 5'-CCCTCACTGAGTTGGAAAATAAGAAATGACAATTGTGAGG-3' and 5'-CCTCACAATTGTCATTTCTTATTTTCCAACTCAGTGAGGG-3' as primers in the in vitro mutagenesis reaction.
Transfection Using siRNAsThe target sequences for designing the siRNA against AP-2
were obtained from Hokkaido System Science Co. (Hokkaido, Japan), and the sequence for the scrambled control was designed with four base mutations. Sense and antisense DNA oligonucleotides were inserted into piGENE mU6 vector. The target sequences for designing the siRNAs against AP-2
and scrambled control were as follows: AP-2
, 5'-CTACTCAGTTCAACTTCAAAGTACA-3'; scrambled control, 5'-CTACTCAGCCCAACGGCAAAGTACA-3' (underlining indicates the mutated bases).
Statistical AnalysisAll values are expressed as the mean ± S.E. unless otherwise stated. Scheffe's multiple comparison test was used to determine the significance of any differences among more than three groups. A p value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Modulates the Gene Expression of Adiponectin and IL-6Adipocyte hypertrophy has been proposed as the primary cause of dysregulation of expression and secretion of adipocytokine in obesity, leading to metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes (5). We reported previously that overexpression of AP-2
leads to lipid accumulation through enhanced glucose transport in 3T3-L1 adipocytes (3). We, therefore, sought to evaluate the expression of adipocytokine genes under the same conditions. AP-2
was transfected into 3T3-L1 adipocytes with adenoviral vector 10 days after differentiation, and the mRNA expression of adiponectin and IL-6 was measured by real-time quantitative RT-PCR at 14 days. As shown in Fig. 1A, the mRNA expression of the IL-6 gene was augmented by 12.5-fold. In contrast, the mRNA expression of the adiponectin gene was inhibited by 62%. Consistent with these findings, IL-6 and adiponectin secretion into the media was increased by 2.2-fold and decreased by 48%, respectively, in cells overexpressing AP-2
(Fig. 1, B and C). The cellular level of IL-6 and adiponectin was also increased and decreased, respectively, in the cells expressing AP-2
(Fig. 1D).
Effects of AP-2
on Adiponectin and IL-6 Expression Is Independent of Adipocyte HypertrophyIt was difficult to distinguish the effect of adipocyte hypertrophy on the expression of adipocytokines in AP-2
-overexpressing cells. Because 3T3-L1 adipocytes at 57 days after induction of differentiation contain only a small number of lipid droplets, the effect of adipocyte hypertrophy could be minimized. Thus, we next transfected the vector expressing AP-2
(pcDNA3.1/AP-2
) into 3T3-L1 adipocytes at 5 days after induction of differentiation and measured the mRNA expression of adiponectin and IL-6 after 48 h. As expected, the mRNA expression of AP-2
was increased in a vector dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2, top panel). In this condition, the mRNA expression of IL-6 was increased, but that of adiponectin was decreased in a vector dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2, middle and bottom panels). These results suggest that the effect of AP-2
on the expression of both adiponectin and IL-6 is independent of adipocyte hypertrophy.
Overexpression of AP-2
Inhibits Adiponectin but Not IL-6 Promoter ActivityTo explore the possibility that AP-2
directly modulates the gene expression levels of adiponectin or IL-6, we next tested the effect of AP-2
on the transcriptional activities of adiponectin and IL-6 by luciferase reporter assays. As shown in Fig. 3A, overexpression of AP-2
did not affect the IL-6 promoter activity but inhibited the activity of adiponectin promoter in a vector dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3B).
|
Knockdown by siRNA Enhances Adiponectin Promoter ActivityTo evaluate the physiological role of AP-2
, we electroporated siRNA against AP-2
into 3T3-L1 adipocytes to deplete endogenous AP-2
protein. Forty-eight hours after electroporation, mRNA expression and the amount of AP-2
protein in the nuclear fraction were decreased by 70% in AP-2
siRNA-transfected cells compared with scrambled control siRNA-transfected cells (Fig. 4, A and B). In this condition, knockdown of AP-2
did not affect the mRNA expression of IL-6 but augmented that of adiponectin (Fig. 4C). Consistent with this, the promoter activity of adiponectin was also augmented by knockdown of AP-2
(Fig. 4D). These results indicate that endogenous AP-2
modulates adiponectin promoter activity and that the regulatory effect of AP-2
on IL-6 expression occurs via a different mechanism to its effect on adiponectin.
|
|
Is Required for Its Inhibitory Effect on Adiponectin PromoterTo determine whether the AP-2
effect on adiponectin promoter activity is mediated via its role as a transcription factor, we prepared a mutant AP-2
lacking the ability to bind DNA. Arginine 225 of AP-2
is located in the DNA binding domain, and replacement of this arginine with cysteine (R225C) extinguishes DNA binding ability (28, 29). We transiently expressed the wild-type (WT) and mutant (R225C) AP-2
in 3T3-L1 adipocytes and then measured adiponectin promoter activity. Adiponectin promoter activity was inhibited in WT-transfected cells; however, the R225C mutant had no effect despite identical expression levels of the recombinant WT and mutated AP-2
(Fig. 5, A and B). These results suggest that the DNA binding activity of AP-2
is required for its inhibitory effect on the adiponectin promoter.
Identification of AP-2
-responsive Element in Adiponectin PromoterThe AP-2 transcription factor family consists of five members, AP-2
, AP-2
, AP-2
, AP-2
, and AP-2
, with each encoded by a separate gene, and all members recognize the same consensus sequence (5'-GCCN3GGG/C-3') through the basic domain that lies immediately N-terminal of the dimerization motif (3034). There is 55.9% sequence homology between the proximal promoter regions of human and mouse adiponectin (22). As shown in Fig. 6A, we found that the human adiponectin promoter has two putative AP-2 binding sites (110 to 102, candidate 1, and 88 to 80, candidate 2). The mouse adiponectin promoter has only one putative binding site that corresponds to the candidate 2 human promoter. Interestingly, these regions are close to NF-Y and C/EBP binding sites (21).
To identify the exact AP-2 binding sites, we performed EMSA using nuclear extracts from 3T3-L1 adipocytes. The oligonucleotide probe corresponding to candidate 1 did not form a complex (Fig. 6B, first lane), whereas candidate 2 oligonucleotide successfully formed the complex (Fig. 6B, second lane). This binding was not affected by unlabeled competitor oligonucleotide for C/EBP (Fig. 6B, third lane) but was ablated by unlabeled competitor oligonucleotide for NF-Y (Fig. 6B, fourth lane). The intensity of this binding was also attenuated by unlabeled competitor oligonucleotide for AP-2 (Fig. 6B, fifth lane). As shown in Fig. 6A, the binding sites for AP-2 and NF-Y seem to overlap, and it is possible that the expression levels of endogenous AP-2
are lower than that of NF-Y. To address this, we repeated the assay using nuclear extract from cells overexpressing AP-2
. As shown in Fig. 6C, the signal derived from AP-2
-overexpressing cells was strong and broad; it also was partially ablated by either the competitive AP-2 consensus oligonucleotide or a blocking anti-AP-2
antibody (Fig. 6D, third through fifth lanes). The signal derived from AP-2
-overexpressing cells did not appear in 32P-radiolabeled candidate 1 oligonucleotide (Fig. 6D, first and second lanes). To further confirm the precise binding site, we generated a mutant oligonucleotide probe of candidate 2. We point mutated CC to AA at the 87/86 position and GG to AA at the 82/81 position (Fig. 6, box). These replacements totally abolished the complex formation (Fig. 6D, sixth and seventh lanes), suggesting that the candidate 2 sequence (88 to 80) is the AP-2 binding site.
|
|
and NF-Y Bind to the Same Region of Adiponectin Promoter in VivoTo further evaluate the interaction between transcriptional factors, AP-2
, NF-YA, and C/EBP
, we performed a ChIP assay using the corresponding antibodies. The DNA encompassing the region containing the AP-2, NF-Y, and C/EBP binding sites was amplified by PCR from chromatin immunoprecipitated with antibodies against C/EBP
, NF-YA, and AP-2
(Fig. 7A). The DNA binding of NF-YA was greater than that of AP-2
but decreased when AP-2
was overexpressed (Fig. 7A, lower panel). These results suggest that AP-2
and NF-YA may competitively bind to an identical region of the adiponectin gene promoter.
|
, or both were transiently overexpressed in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, and the adiponectin promoter activity was measured. Overexpression of NF-YA alone did not affect the adiponectin promoter activity compared with pcDNA3.1 alone (Fig. 7C), consistent with the report that NF-YA may have a crucial role in maintaining basal adiponectin gene expression (21). This was based on the findings that overexpression of dominant-negative mutant NF-YA but not wild-type NF-YA, affected adiponectin promoter activity. Based on these findings, we speculated that NF-Y is constitutively expressed and composed of three different subunits, which are collectively required to bind to the sequence (21). Co-expression of NF-YA and AP-2
partially rescued the inhibition by AP-2
alone. These results further support the competitive binding of NF-YA and AP-2
on identical regions of the adiponectin gene promoter.
Introduction of a Mutation in the Adiponectin Promoter Region Abolishes the Inhibitory Effect of AP-2
Finally, to further validate the importance of AP-2
binding to the adiponectin promoter, we introduced point mutations in the adiponectin promoter region in the same positions as the mutant candidate 2 oligonucleotide (Fig. 6A). Replacement of four nucleotides led to decreased luciferase activity due to the missing NF-Y binding site. Furthermore, these mutations completely abolished the inhibitory effect of AP-2
on adiponectin promoter activity (Fig. 8). These results suggest that AP-2
directly binds to the adiponectin promoter (position 88 to 80) and inhibits its activity.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
transcription factor is a candidate gene for causing metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes through the induction of adipocyte dysfunction, based on the following findings. We first identified the AP-2
gene as a susceptibility gene for type 2 diabetes by conducting a genome-wide association study (1). Several variations in the AP-2
were significantly associated with type 2 diabetes. Second, AP-2
is preferentially expressed in adipose tissue, and its expression is increased upon induction of differentiation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes (1). Third, subjects with the disease susceptible allele have stronger expression of AP-2
in adipose tissue than subjects without the susceptible allele (2). Finally, overexpression of AP-2
leads to lipid accumulation by enhancing glucose transport and induces insulin resistance in 3T3-L1 adipocytes (3).
In the present study, overexpression of AP-2
augmented the expression and secretion of IL-6, whereas it inhibited the expression and secretion of adiponectin. These results are consistent with the changes observed in obesity (35, 36). Because AP-2
is a transcription factor, it may directly bind to the promoter regions of adipocytokines and thereby modulate their transcriptional activities. We identified putative AP-2 binding sites in the promoter region of adiponectin; the promoter activity of this cytokine was inhibited by overexpression of AP-2
and enhanced by its knockdown, whereas that of IL-6 was unaffected. These results are consistent with the fact that putative AP-2 binding site exists in the adiponectin but not in the IL-6 promoter region. We also demonstrated a direct interaction between the adiponectin promoter and AP-2
by both EMSA and ChIP assay. These results suggest that different molecular mechanisms operate to regulate the expressions of adiponectin and IL-6. AP-2
may not only modulate the expressions of certain adipocytokines through direct binding of its promoter region but may also indirectly modulate adipocytokine expression in some cases. Further studies are needed to explore the mechanism by which AP-2
modulates IL-6 expression as well as other adipocytokines.
|
binding site is close to those of C/EBP
and NF-YA transcriptional factors, which bind to the adiponectin gene promoter region, and NF-YA was reported to play a crucial role in maintaining basal adiponectin gene expression (21). In particular, AP-2
and NF-YA seemed to share the identical binding site. In fact, DNA binding of AP-2
was ablated by unlabeled competitor oligonucleotide for NF-Y and decreased by the AP-2 oligonucleotide by EMSA. These results raised the possibility that AP-2
and NF-YA form a molecular complex, which might bind to the adiponectin promoter. However, we did not observe complex formation of these two molecules by coimmunoprecipitation assay (data not shown). Furthermore, our ChIP assay suggested that AP-2
and NF-YA may competitively bind to an identical region of the adiponectin promoter. Overexpression of AP-2
decreased the DNA binding of NF-YA but did not affect the DNA binding of C/EBP
, whereas overexpression of NF-Y decreased the DNA binding of AP-2
, and NF-YA overexpression partially rescued the inhibitory effect of AP-2
on adiponectin promoter activity. The AP-2 transcriptional factor modulated several genes, some of which were up-regulated (34, 3744), whereas others are down-regulated (45, 46). Competitive binding of AP-2 with other transcription factors such as NF-Y is a possible molecular mechanism underlying the diverse effects of AP-2.
The finding that AP-2
leads to lipid accumulation by enhancing glucose transport in 3T3-L1 adipocytes led us to propose AP-2
as the candidate gene behind adipocyte hypertrophy. However, expression of AP-2
was increased upon induction of differentiation, reaching a peak at 14 days (when the cells were most mature as assessed by insulin-stimulated glucose transport activity) and declined thereafter, even when the adipocytes continued to accumulate lipids in 3T3-L1 adipocytes (data not shown). These results suggest that AP-2
plays a role in the differentiation and maturation of adipocytes rather than in their hypertrophy. Furthermore, our preliminary experiments revealed no increased, but rather reduced expression of AP-2
in obese mice such as the ob/ob, db/db, and KKAy animals (data not shown). We observed that subjects with disease-susceptible alleles have stronger expression of AP-2
in adipose tissue (2). Thus, AP-2
expression may be predominantly regulated by genetic factors such as polymorphisms that affect disease susceptibility, whereas environmental factors may not regulate AP-2
expression and acquired obesity may not affect its expression.
In conclusion, we identified the AP-2
binding site in the promoter region of the human and mouse adiponectin genes and found that AP-2
inhibits the transcriptional activity of the adiponectin gene through its binding in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Based on these findings, we hypothesize that the AP-2
transcriptional factor is a candidate gene causing dysfunction in adipocytes, leading to metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-77-548-2222; Fax: 81-77-543-3858; E-mail: maegawa{at}belle.shiga-med.ac.jp.
2 The abbreviations used are: IL-6, interleukin-6; Acrp30, adipocyte complement-related protein of 30 kDa; AP-2
, activating enhancer-binding protein-2
; C/EBP, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; luc, luciferase; NF-Y, nuclear transcription factor-Y; NF-YA, NF-Y, subunit A; RT, reverse transcription; siRNA, small interfering RNA; WT, wild type. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|