|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 44, 33115-33126, November 3, 2006
Coordinated Regulation of the Neisseria gonorrhoeae-truncated Denitrification Pathway by the Nitric Oxide-sensitive Repressor, NsrR, and Nitrite-insensitive NarQ-NarP*
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We previously reported that expression of aniA is activated by the oxygen-sensitive transcription regulator FNR2 (NGO1579) and by a two-component regulatory system that we designated NarQ-NarP (5, 9). Although aniA transcription is further activated during growth in the presence of nitrite, but not nitrate (5), it is unknown whether nitrite is sensed directly by NarQ or indirectly by another transcription factor. In contrast to aniA, expression of norB encoding the nitric oxide reductase is independent of FNR but is induced by nitric oxide by an unknown mechanism (4). Recent studies have identified members of the Rrf2 family of transcription factors that, in response to the availability of reactive nitrogen species, regulate expression of genes involved in denitrification and reactive nitrogen species metabolism (10, 11). A multigenome bioinformatic study identified a putative Rrf2 family member similar in sequence to the NsrR proteins of E. coli and Nitrosomonas europea in N. gonorrhoeae (12). The same study identified putative NsrR binding sites in the aniA promoter region (Fig. 1B) and in the regulatory regions of three other genes that include norB and dnrN (NGO0653), which is predicted to encode a reactive nitrogen species-responsive protein. We have therefore investigated the roles of NarQ-NarP and NsrR (NGO1519) in the regulation of the truncated denitrification pathway of the gonococcus. Evidence is presented that NO rather than nitrite is the signal to which NsrR responds and that, in the absence of NO, NsrR represses both aniA and norB transcription. Finally, we show that the gonococcal NarQ is insensitive to nitrite and apparently locked on in its sensor kinase mode.
| EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Construction of a frdA::lacZ Reporter StrainTo construct the NarL-repressed frdA::lacZ reporter strain, the Lac E. coli strain RV was first transduced with bacteriophage P1 that had been propagated on a strain carrying an frdA::lacZ fusion. Because strain RV cannot metabolize lactose, only Lac+ transductants were able to express
-galactosidase activity. Transductants were enriched during overnight growth in LB supplemented with lactose, streaked onto MacConkey-lactose agar and incubated overnight at 37 °C. Areas of growth showing a red, lactose-positive phenotype were streaked for purification by single colony isolation. Lac+ transductants were checked for repression of transcription from the frdA promoter during anaerobic growth in the presence, but not in the absence, of nitrate (17). The narX and narQ mutations were then introduced by successive rounds of transduction with bacteriophage P1 that had been propagated on insertion-deletion mutants that had been generated by the method of Datsenko and Wanner (18), followed by curing of the antibiotic resistance determinant to leave unmarked deletions in narQ and narX as described previously (18).
Construction of Plasmids Expressing Gonococcal and E. coli narQPTo construct plasmid pBADgcQ, the gonococcal narQ gene was cloned into the arabinose-inducible pBAD myc-hisA overexpression vector using primers NgNarQNcoI and NgNarQHindIII to generate an NcoI-HindIII narQ fragment, which was ligated into NcoI/HindIII-digested pBAD myc-hisA (Invitrogen). Similarly, pBADecQ contained the E. coli narQ gene cloned into pBAD myc-hisA. Primers EcNarQHindIII and EcNarQ HindIII were used to generate an NcoI-BamHI E. coli narQ fragment, which was cloned into pBAD myc-hisA. The QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis system (Stratagene) was used to generate specific mutations in narQ genes using primers listed in supplemental Table S1.
Chimeric NarQ proteins were generated by introducing restriction sites into pBADgcQ and pBADecQ, restriction digestion, and ligation of resultant fragments. For P'-box hybrids, BamHI sites were introduced at codons 143144 of E. coli narQ (introducing substitutions A143G and E144S in plasmid pRNW202) and the corresponding codons 155 and 156 of gonococcal narQ (introducing substitution E156S in pRNW203). The resultant plasmids were digested with BamHI: the gonococcal narQ gene (from the P'-box to the stop codon) was ligated into the vector fragment containing the E. coli narQ N-terminal fragment, yielding the E. coli-gonococcal P'-box fusion encoded by pRNW200. The E. coli narQ gene fragment was likewise ligated into the vector fragment containing the gonococcal narQ N-terminal, yielding the gonococcal-E. coli P'-box fusion (pRNW201). Similarly, the TMII chimaeras were created by introducing BamHI restriction sites into E. coli narQ at codons 167 and 168 (resulting in substitutions F167W and T168I: pRNW302) and gonococcal narQ codons 179180 (substitutions L179R M180I: pRNW303). The HAMP linker chimaeras were created by introducing NdeI sites into E. coli narQ at codon 217 (resulting in substitution E217H: pRNW402) and into gonococcal narQ at codon 228 (generating substitution E228H: pRNW403). The Y-box chimaeras were created by introducing BstBI sites into E. coli narQ at codon 229 (resulting in substitution L229F: pRNW502) and into gonococcal narQ at codon 240 (generating substitution L240F: pRNW503).
Growth of N. gonorrhoeaeN. gonorrhoeae was grown on gonococcal agar plates and in gonococcal broth (Beckton Dickinson UK Ltd.). Solid and liquid media were supplemented with 1% (v/v) Kellogg's Supplement (19). For liquid cultures, 2 µl of a stock of N. gonorrhoeae was plated onto a gonococcal agar plate and incubated in a candle jar at 37 °C for 24 h. Bacteria from this plate were swabbed onto a second plate and incubated in the same way for a further 16 h. The entire bacterial growth from this second plate was swabbed into 10 ml of gonococcal broth and incubated at 37 °C in an orbital shaker at 100 rpm for 1 h. This 10-ml pre-culture was then tipped into 50 ml of gonococcal broth in a 100-ml conical flask and incubated in the same way. For growth with nitrite, the flasks were supplemented with 1 mM NaNO2 after 1 h and a further 4 mM NaNO2 after 2 h.
Preparation of RNA for Microarray ExperimentsRNA was extracted from five independent cultures of each strain during exponential growth. Samples (10 ml) of bacterial culture were mixed with an equal volume of RNAlater (Ambion), and the bacteria were pelleted by centrifugation, resuspended in 0.5 ml of RNAlater, and stored at 4 °C overnight. Bacteria were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in TRIzol (Invitrogen) by vortexing for 10 min. Chloroform was added, the phases were separated, and the aqueous phase was transferred to a clean tube. Crude RNA in the aqueous phase was precipitated with isopropanol and cleaned using an RNeasy kit (Qiagen). Purified RNA was eluted in RNase-free water with 2% (v/v) SuperaseIN RNase inhibitor (Ambion). RNA was quantified using a Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Labtech), and integrity was checked using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and RNA Nano Chips, according to manufacturer's instructions.
cDNA Generation, Labeling, and Microarray HybridizationReagents and enzymes for the preparation of materials for microarray hybridizations were sourced from the 3DNA Array 900-MPX kit (Genisphere, Hatfield, PA) unless otherwise stated. One microgram of RNA was reverse-transcribed into unlabeled cDNA using SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) at 42 °C for 2 h. The cDNA was cleaned using a Clean & Concentrate-5 column (Zymo Research) and poly-T tailed with terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase. Dye-specific capture sequences were ligated to the poly-T tails, and the tagged cDNAs were cleaned using a Clean & Concentrate-5 column. The pan-Neisseria microarray version 2 (14), containing probes to N. gonorrhoeae and Neisseria meningitidis genes, was used for these experiments. Microarray slides were prehybridized in 3.5 x SSC, 0.1% SDS, and 10 mg ml1 bovine serum albumin for 65 °C for 20 min, washed with water and isopropanol, dried with an airbrush, and pre-scanned to check for array defects. The capture sequence-tagged cDNAs were hybridized onto the microarray slide for 16 h at 60 °C in a SlideBooster (Advalytix) with the power setting at 25 and a pulse/pause ratio of 3:7. Following the first hybridization, the slides were washed in 2x SSC, 0.2% SDS for 10 min at 60 °C, followed by washes at 2x SSC and 0.2x SSC for 10 min, each at room temperature. The slides were dried with an airbrush and hybridized with the Cy3 and Cy5 capture reagents at 55 °C for 4 h in a SlideBooster. The slides were again washed in 2x SSC, 0.2% SDS (10 min at 60 °C) followed by 10-min room temperature washes in 2x SSC and 0.2x SSC (10 min at room temperature) and dried with an airbrush. Dried slides were scanned using a ScanArray ExpressHT (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) using autocalibration to obtain optimized non-saturating images for each fluorophore.
Microarray Data AnalysisScanned microarray images were straightened, if necessary, with ImageViewer (BlueGnome) and analyzed using BlueFuse for Microarrays (BlueGnome). Spot data were extracted from images and manually flagged to remove artifacts before fusion. Fused data were filtered according to the pON value (20). Spots with pON values <0.5 in both channels were excluded to eliminate the bias generated by the inclusion of unhybridized spots in the statistical interpretation of the data, and the data were globally adjusted such that the mean rRNA ratio was 1.0. The data were then analyzed using BASE. For each pairwise comparison, gene expression median -fold changes were calculated from the biological replicates using the MGH fold-change algorithm, and the Student's t test was used to assess statistical significance. For the NarP microarray experiment, a cutoff p value of 0.05 was used. Genes whose transcript levels did not change consistently (i.e. with an expression ratio greater than or less than one in all five replicate experiments) in all the biological replicates for each experiment were discarded. Data were also analyzed using a locally prepared implementation of the Cyber-T algorithm within BASE; the results from this analysis are available online (gbrowse.molbiol.ox.ac.uk/cgi-bin/gbrowse/NarPQ/; username: NarPQ; password: reviewOnly). Total microarray data have been deposited in the ArrayExpress data base (www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress) with the accession number "E-MEXP-726" (hybridizations were PNA8_36 to PNA8_41).
Generation of a Chromosomal 3xFLAG Fusion in N. gonorrhoeaeCodons for a 3xFLAG tag, (DYKDDDDK)3, were linked in-frame to the 3'-end of the narP gene on the chromosome of N. gonorrhoeae strain F62 using crossover PCR (16). Three fragments corresponding to the 3'-end of the gonococcal narP gene, the region immediately downstream of the narP gene, and the FLAG tag and kanamycin resistance cassette carried on pSUB11 were generated by PCR using primer pairs NarPXO1 plus NarPXO2, NarPXO3 plus NarPXO4, and pSUBXO1 plus pSUBXO2, respectively. The three PCR products were cleaned and combined in a second PCR using primers NarPXO1 and NarPXO4. This reaction generated a 3-kb product containing the narP gene fused to a 3xFLAG tag, a kanamycin resistance cassette, and the region downstream of the narP gene. This fragment was transformed into piliated N. gonorrhoeae strain F62 generating strain JCGC501, carrying a chromosomal narP::FLAG fusion.
Western BlottingGonococcal proteins separated by Tris/Tricine SDS-PAGE using a 15% polyacrylamide gel were blotted onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and FLAG-tagged NarP protein was detected using anti-FLAG monoclonal antibodies (Sigma) and the ECL-Plus chemiluminescence detection system (GE Healthcare Life Sciences).
Chromatin ImmunoprecipitationInteractions between NarP and promoter DNA were studied in vivo by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) as described in ref. 21. Oxygen-limited cultures of N. gonorrhoeae strain JCGC501 were grown in the presence of 5 mM NaNO2 to late exponential phase. Protein-DNA cross-linking, DNA-protein complex preparations, and immunoprecipitations were as described previously except that the tagged protein was immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG monoclonal antibodies (Sigma) for 16 h at 4 °C. The concentration of immunoprecipitated promoter fragments was measured using quantitative real-time PCR (22). Primers for each promoter were designed using PrimerExpress (Applied Biosystems) and are listed in supplemental Table S1. The promoter of the hpt (NG2035) gene, which is not regulated by NarP and is not preceded by a NarP binding site, was a negative control used to normalize the data. Promoter fragments enriched by 50% or more in at least two independent ChIP experiments, relative to the hpt promoter fragment, were scored positive.
Quantitative Real-time PCR Analysis of Gene ExpressionRNA was stabilized by mixing 500 µl of bacterial culture with 900 µl of RNAlater (Ambion). After 5-min incubation at room temperature, the bacteria were harvested by centrifugation at 3000 x g for 10 min. RNA was isolated from the pellet using an RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen) using the manufacturer's protocol. Genomic DNA was removed from the purified RNA using TURBO DNase (Ambion). The RNA was reverse-transcribed to cDNA using a Superscript first-strand synthesis kit (Invitrogen). For each sample, a control to check for DNA contamination in the RNA preparation was included from which reverse transcriptase was omitted. Transcript levels were measured by quantitative real-time PCR using SensiMix with SYBR green detection (Quantace) and an ABI 7000 sequence analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Primers, designed using PrimerExpress (Applied Biosystems), are described in supplemental Table S1 (available online). Transcript levels were quantified using the 
Ct method (23) relative to expression of the polA gene. For each experiment, quantitative real-time PCR was used to determine transcript levels in triplicate on three independent cDNA samples derived from three independent cultures. Error bars show standard deviations. Expression levels were normalized to the parental strain in the absence of nitrite or nitric oxide.
-Galactosidase AssayE. coli was grown at 37 °C in 10 ml of minimal medium (24) supplemented with 40 mM sodium fumarate, 10% LB, and 0.4% glycerol. Where stated, cultures were supplemented with 20 mM NaNO3 or 2.5 mM NaNO2. 2-ml aliquots of bacterial cultures were lysed by the addition of 30 µl of each toluene and 2% (w/v) sodium deoxycholate and aerated at 30 °C for 20 min. Lysates were assayed for
-galactosidase activity as previously described (25).
Sequence Pattern SearchingPotential NarP binding sites were located in promoter regions using Findpatterns in the GCG suite (Accelrys, Cambridge, UK). The consensus E. coli binding site for NarP, TACYNMTNNAKNRGTA, was used to search the gonococcal DNA sequences.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Potential NarP-binding sites (at least a 12/14 match to the E. coli consensus NarP binding site, TACYNMTNNAKNRGTA) were identified within 400 bp upstream of only five genes differentially expressed in the narP+ and narP strains (Table 2): nitric oxide reductase norB, nitrite reductase aniA, putative sensor kinase narQ, and two hypothetical genes, NGO1215 and NGO1370. Because there is a common divergent regulatory region between two of these genes, aniA and norB, expression of these genes is regulated from four promoter regions. A strain containing a chromosomal narP::3xFLAG fusion was constructed (N. gonorrhoeae strain JCGC501) and anti-FLAG antibodies were used to immunoprecipitate NarP-DNA complexes from formaldehyde-cross-linked chromatin. All four promoter regions with potential NarP sites were enriched in ChIP experiments, confirming that NarP binds to the target promoter fragments. The aniA-norB promoter region contains one potential NarP binding site, centered between bases 95 and 96 upstream of the mapped aniA transcription start (Fig. 1B). Thus, NarP is likely to act at this site, activating aniA expression. Because norB expression is induced by NO, the product of nitrite reduction by AniA, the differential expression of norB observed in the microarray is likely to be an indirect effect, caused by the synthesis of more NO in the narP+ strain than in the narP mutant. This is also the likely explanation for the induction of nosZ transcription, which appears to be NarP-dependent in the microarray data, but has no NarP binding site (and so is not listed in Table 2) and was not enriched in ChIP experiments (the enrichment ratio was <1% in all experiments). Because NarP was not detected to bind to the nosZ promoter, it also acts as a negative control for the ChIP experiment.
|
|
Gonococcal NsrR, Not NarP, Regulates the aniA Promoter in Response to NitritePrevious studies had indicated that expression of N. gonorrhoeae aniA is activated by FNR when oxygen becomes growth-limiting and by NarQ-NarP in response to the availability of nitrite (5). However, results from another study (9) suggested that, even in the absence of NarP, the aniA promoter might still respond to nitrite, so it was not established whether nitrite directly activates the kinase activity of NarQ, or activates aniA expression by another mechanism. Because the previous study relied on
-galactosidase assays using a heterogeneous population of plate-grown bacteria, the assays were repeated using homogeneous liquid cultures.
Oxygen-limited cultures of N. gonorrhoeae strains RUG7001 and RUG7036 (narP), both carrying chromosomal aniA::lacZ fusions, were grown in the presence and absence of 5 mM sodium nitrite. In the presence of nitrite, the
-galactosidase activity of the narP+ strain, RUG7001, was far higher than in the absence of nitrite (Table 3). When grown in the presence of nitrite, the
-galactosidase activity of the narP strain RUG7036 was comparable to that of the narP+ strain in the absence of nitrite, but was even lower during growth in the absence of nitrite. These results established that, although the aniA promoter is activated by NarP and by nitrite, NarP is not essential for nitrite activation.
|
2-fold by nitrite in the nsrR+ strain, whereas in the nsrR strain, aniA expression was not induced by nitrite and was comparable to expression in the presence of nitrite in the nsrR+ strain.
The nsrR gene was also deleted from N. gonorrhoeae strain RUG7036 (aniA::lacZ narP) yielding strain JCGC702. Both strains were grown in the presence and absence of 5 mM nitrite, and the
-galactosidase activity was assayed when each culture had become oxygen-limited (Fig. 1D). The
-galactosidase activity of strain JCGC702 (narP nsrR) was essentially identical in the presence and absence of nitrite and similar to strain RUG7036 (narP nsrR+) grown in the presence of nitrite. Note that there was no correlation between growth rate and transcript level, suggesting that NsrR is a repressor of the aniA promoter. During growth in the presence of nitrite, NsrR is inactivated and aniA expression is de-repressed. In the nsrR mutant, there is no regulation of PaniA by nitrite, suggesting that NsrR is the only nitrite-sensing transcription factor acting at this promoter. Furthermore, in the absence of NsrR, NarP constitutively activates PaniA.
|
Hybrid Gonococcal E. coli NarQ Proteins Exhibit Unusual Sensing and Kinase CharacteristicsDemonstration that the mechanism of nitrite induction at PaniA depends on relief of repression by NsrR in response to availability of nitrite indicated marked differences between the E. coli and gonococcal environmental sensors that have been designated NarQ. Only a very limited range of genetic techniques are available to investigate sensor kinases by site-directed mutagenesis and gene deletions in the gonococcus. To investigate the ligand sensing and signal transduction characteristics of the gonococcal NarQ protein, the gonococcal narQ gene was expressed in E. coli from plasmid pBAD-myc His, and the ability of the gonococcal NarQ to phosphorylate E. coli NarL was investigated using the NarL-repressed frdA promoter as a reporter of protein binding to DNA.
Hybrid sensor kinases have been constructed previously by fusing the sensing and kinase domains of two sensor kinases, resulting in chimaeras with the ligand-sensing and kinase specificities of the two fused proteins (27, 28). In this study, the N. gonorrhoeae and E. coli NarQ proteins were fused at four points: the end of the P'-box; at the C-terminal end of the second transmembrane domain; in amphipathic sequence 2 in the HAMP linker; and in the Y-box. For each fusion, two hybrids were created; one with E. coli NarQ N-terminal and N. gonorrhoeae C-terminal regions, the other with N. gonorrhoeae N-terminal and E. coli C-terminal regions (Table 4). Because the construction of each fusion required the introduction of a restriction site that resulted in amino acid substitutions, the function of the E. coli and N. gonorrhoeae NarQ proteins substituted at the site of the restriction site were also assessed. E. coli strain JCB12 (narX narQ frdA::lacZ) was transformed with plasmids expressing chimeric or restriction site-mutated NarQ proteins. Transformants were grown anaerobically in the presence or absence of nitrate or nitrite, and
-galactosidase activities were measured to determine the ability of the mutated NarQ proteins to phosphorylate NarL and repress frdA expression (Table 4).
|
The P'-box and TMII fusions were "locked-off" in gonococcal N-terminal and E. coli C-terminal chimaeras, and locked-on in E. coli N-terminal and N. gonorrhoeae C-terminal hybrids. The N terminus of N. gonorrhoeae NarQ appears to be either ligand-insensitive, or incapable of transducing a "no ligand" signal to the C terminus of E. coli NarQ, whereas the C terminus of N. gonorrhoeae NarQ appears to be constitutively active. All of the HAMP linker and Y-box chimaeras were locked-on, possibly reflecting the importance of interactions between the two helices comprising the HAMP linker and the Y-box. From these experiments in E. coli, it was concluded that the N. gonorrhoeae NarQ protein is ligand-insensitive and constitutively active in a locked-on phenotype.
NsrR Regulates Expression of the Nitric Oxide ReductaseExpression of the N. gonorrhoeae norB gene encoding the nitric oxide reductase is independent of FNR, but is induced by nitric oxide via an unknown mechanism (4). In addition to the NsrR binding site located at the aniA promoter, sites were also identified at the norB promoter, and the dnrN promoter, which regulates expression of a putative reactive nitrogen species-responsive gene homologous to the E. coli ytfE gene (Fig. 3A) (12, 29). Real-time quantitative PCR was used to determine the relative amounts of the norB and dnrN transcripts in N. gonorrhoeae strains F62 (nsrR+) and JCGC751 (nsrR) grown in the presence and absence of nitrite (Fig. 3, B and C). In the nsrR+ strain, expression of both genes was highly induced during growth in the presence of nitrite under conditions in which nitric oxide is generated from nitrite by AniA. In the nsrR strain, both genes were expressed constitutively at high level even in the absence of nitrite, suggesting that NsrR represses both norB and dnrN, the repression being lifted upon exposure to reactive nitrogen species.
Growth Response of the NsrR Mutant to Sudden Exposure to Toxic Concentrations of NitriteThe growth phenotype of the nsrR strain JCGC751 provided preliminary evidence that NsrR plays a critical role in NO homeostasis. Although there was no difference in growth phenotype between the mutant and the parental strain during oxygen-limited growth in the presence or absence of nitrite, opposite responses were seen when uninduced cultures were suddenly exposed to a high concentration of nitrite (Fig. 4, A and B). When oxygen-limited cultures were first grown in the absence of nitrite to an A650 of
0.4, the addition of 5 mM nitrite completely inhibited growth of the wild-type strain but enhanced the growth rate of the nsrR mutant. This difference was most probably due to the sudden production of nitric oxide. In the absence of nitrite, the parental strain would synthesize nitrite reductase AniA but not NO reductase NorB, so upon addition of nitrite, nitric oxide would accumulate and inhibit growth. In contrast, constitutive synthesis of NorB by the nsrR strain would prevent the accumulation of nitric oxide, and hence its growth would not be inhibited.
|
|
NsrR Responds to Nitric Oxide Rather than NitriteNsrR proteins in other bacteria have been shown to regulate gene expression in response to reactive nitrogen species. Although both nitrite and nitric oxide have been suggested to act as the ligand to NsrR, the exact signal to which NsrR responds is unknown (1012). To determine whether N. gonorrhoeae NsrR responds to nitric oxide, oxygen-limited cultures of strains F62, JCGC701 (fnr) and JCGC751 (nsrR), were grown without nitrite to an A650 of between 0.3 and 0.4, and the shaker speed was decreased to 50 rpm to decrease the oxygen concentration in the cultures. After 20 min, nitric oxide-saturated water was added to half of the cultures to a final NO concentration of 10 µM. An equal volume of sterile water was added to the control cultures. After 20 min, RNA was isolated from the cultures and reverse-transcribed to cDNA, and the quantities of aniA, norB, and dnrN transcripts were determined by quantitative real-time PCR (Fig. 5, AC). Because nitric oxide can react with oxygen to produce nitrite, a qualitative nitrite assay was used to show that no nitrite was present in NO-shocked cultures of the parental strain and the nsrR mutant. A trace of nitrite was detected in cultures of the fnr mutant. This indicates that, although some nitrite is likely to be generated during treatment with NO, it is immediately reduced to NO by AniA in the parental and nsrR strains. Because the fnr strain is unable to synthesize AniA, any nitrite generated chemically would accumulate in the growth medium. The norB and dnrN promoters were induced by NO in an NsrR-dependent manner. The aniA promoter was NsrR-repressed but not NO-induced, possibly because FNR was inactivated by NO. However, as in cultures grown in the presence and absence of nitrite, aniA, norB, and dnrN were expressed constitutively in the nsrR strain at a high level even in the absence of NO. Whereas aniA expression was FNR-dependent, neither norB nor dnrN expression in the presence of NO was affected by an fnr mutation, confirming that NsrR is the primary regulator of the norB and dnrN promoters. Furthermore, this confirms that differences in transcript levels were not simply due to differences in growth rate.
To confirm that NsrR responds to nitric oxide rather than nitrite generated chemically during treatment of cultures with NO, the response of norB expression to nitrite and nitric oxide in a parental strain, F62, and its aniA mutant, JCGC703, were compared. Both strains were grown in the absence of nitrite to an A650 of
0.4 and pulsed with either NO-saturated water, or sterile water. RNA was isolated, and quantitative real-time PCR was used to assay norB expression (Fig. 5D). In both the aniA+ and aniA strains, NO induced expression of norB. Strains F62 and JCGC703 were also grown in the presence and absence of nitrite, RNA was isolated during exponential growth, and quantitative real-time PCR again used to measure the amount of norB transcript (Fig. 5E). In the aniA+ strain, as observed previously, nitrite induced expression of norB. However, in the aniA mutant that does not express nitrite reductase and so cannot reduce nitrite to nitric oxide, nitrite did not induce norB expression. It is clear from these data that nitric oxide, not nitrite, is the reactive nitrogen species sensed by NsrR in the gonococcus.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A Key Role for NsrR in Protection of Gonococci from Nitric OxideThe original identification of NarQP as the possible nitrite sensor in the gonococcus was based upon the observation that deletion of the region of the aniA promoter containing the NarP binding site resulted in loss of nitrite induction (5). However, data in Fig. 1 confirm preliminary results from a previous experiment, which indicated that the gonococcal NarQ-NarP two-component system is not essential for activation of aniA transcription by nitrite (see Table 3 of Ref. 9). This raises two questions. First, what is the alternative mechanism by which gonococci respond to nitrite? Second, to what signal, if any, does the gonococcal NarQ respond?
The first question was definitively answered by showing that NsrR is both essential and sufficient for transcription activation by nitrite at the aniA promoter. The explanation for the earlier discrepancy is that the NarP-binding site deletion also removed the NsrR binding site. The signal to which NsrR responds is the product of nitrite reduction, nitric oxide, rather than nitrite itself, as shown in Fig. 6. Two other promoters, norB and dnrN, were also repressed by NsrR but were derepressed in the presence of nitric oxide. As in other bacteria, these results identify gonococcal NsrR as the central regulator of the reactive nitrogen species response (Fig. 6). NsrR proteins are also related to the IscR family of transcription factors, which regulate the expression of genes involved in iron-sulfur center metabolism (31). IscR contains a [2Fe-2S] center coordinated by cysteine residues thought to sense the Fe-S center assembly status of the bacteria. NsrR also contains conserved cysteine residues and is proposed to contain an iron-sulfur center that senses reactive nitrogen species (11). NsrR homologues in other bacteria have also been shown to respond to other stimuli, such as iron limitation (11). This "cross-sensing" of stimuli might reflect the need for bacterial transcription factors to sense not one but a variety of environmental signals, integrate these "inputs" and regulate gene expression accordingly. Another example of this is FNR, primarily an oxygen sensor but also capable of sensing reactive nitrogen species (and possibly reactive oxygen species) via damage to its iron-sulfur center (32, 33).
|
- and
-proteobacteria, and only three other NarQ family proteins have been characterized: NarQ and NarX in E. coli; and NarX in Pseudomonas stutzeri (34). The two E. coli proteins sense nitrate and nitrite and regulate expression of a large number of genes; the Pseudomonas protein is thought to sense nitrate and regulate expression of a nitrate reductase. It is entirely possible that gonococcal NarQ responds to a ligand that was present during all of the assays in the current study. If so, the growth requirements of gonococci and their sensitivity to stress imposed by changes in growth environment might make identification of such a ligand difficult. We believe an alternative explanation to be more likely, namely that the gonococcal NarQ is a ligand-insensitive kinase locked in the phosphorylation mode, as indicated by the domain swap and functional studies using the E. coli frd promoter as a model system (Table 4). Implications for PathogenesisPrevious studies have identified possible links between anaerobiosis and gonococcal pathogenesis. Anaerobically grown gonococci are more resistant to human serum than aerobically grown bacteria, in part due to expression of AniA during infection (8, 35). Because aniA expression is dependent upon both FNR and NarQ-NarP, fnr and narQP mutants would also be less virulent than the wild type. One interpretation of these observations might be that, as the gonococcus encounters oxygen limitation in the host, it becomes "primed" for pathogenesis by inducing AniA expression to respire the micromolar concentrations of nitrite present in the host. Nitrite respiration would generate NO, thereby deactivating NsrR, thus further inducing expression of AniA and allowing NorB to be produced. The gonococcus would now be primed for exposure to and rapid detoxification of reactive nitrogen species generated by the host.
From the narrow perspective of gonococcal denitrification, it was initially surprising to find that two successive reactions, nitrite and nitric oxide reduction, are regulated by different mechanisms. However, gonococci must also be able to survive exposure to NO released by macrophages in environments where reactive oxygen species are abundant and FNR would be inactive. The central role of NsrR in maintaining a low concentration of NO, whatever the oxygen status of the environment, enables the gonococcus to neutralize, or even exploit, NO generated as part of the host defense to infection. Gonococci are known to exploit host defense mechanisms for their survival, for example, the ability to sialylate their lipo-oligosaccharide using host-derived CMP-N-acetylneuraminic acid (36, 37). Induction of norB by NO generated by the host would provide a potential source of energy during oxygen-limited growth, enhancing gonococcal survival and growth even during oxygen starvation.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Tables S1 and S2. ![]()
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44-121-414-5440; Fax: 44-121-414-5925; E-mail: j.a.cole{at}bham.ac.uk.
2 The abbreviations used are: FNR, regulator of fumarate and nitrate reduction; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation; NsrR, nitrosative stress response regulator; HAMP, histidine kinase, adenylate cyclase, methyl-accepting protein, and phosphotransferase domain; TMII, second transmembrane region; Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine; pON, probability that the probe-signal in that channel is genuine. ![]()
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|