Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 46, 99936, November 17, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow Papers Of The Week
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Cell Adhesion Surprise{diamondsuit}

Patrick Doherty and Frank Walsh were among the first investigators to use molecular approaches to study cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) and how they function in regulating neurite growth. While studying NCAM, they identified a sequence in the FGF receptor (FGFR) that was homologous to sequences in N-cadherin and L1, two other CAMs that promote neurite growth. They dubbed this region the "CAM homology domain" and conducted experiments using peptides from the domain to argue that the FGFR directly interacted with the CAMs to promote neurite growth. This hypothesis was controversial, but subsequent pharmacological, genetic, and structural studies have given it support.Go


Figure 1
NCAM co-localizes with FGFR.

In this Paper of the Week, Elena Sanchez-Heras and her colleagues in Doherty's laboratory use co-immunoprecipitation and co-clustering assays to map sites on the FGFR that are required for interaction with N-cadherin and NCAM. They demonstrate for the first time that all of the major isoforms of NCAM can interact with the FGFR. Surprisingly, they also find that the interactions require an "acid box" region in the FGFR but not the CAM homology domain. This result leads to an unexpected situation in which FGFR-CAM interactions are confirmed, but a role for the CAM homology domain is excluded.

FOOTNOTES

{diamondsuit} See referenced article, J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 35208-35216 Back



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow Papers Of The Week
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement