JBC Anatrace, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M701534200 on April 12, 2007

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 282, Issue 25, 18448-18457, June 22, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
282/25/18448    most recent
M701534200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharon, M.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, C. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sharon, M.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, C. V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Papers Of The Week
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Mass Spectrometry Reveals the Missing Links in the Assembly Pathway of the Bacterial 20 S Proteasome*{diamondsuit}

Michal Sharon{ddagger}12, Susanne Witt§23, Elke Glasmacher§4, Wolfgang Baumeister§5, and Carol V. Robinson{ddagger}6

From the {ddagger}Departments of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, United Kingdom and the §Department of Molecular Structural Biology, Max-Planck-Institute of Biochemistry, Am Klopferspitz 18, D-82152 Martinsried Germany

Received for publication, February 21, 2007 , and in revised form, April 5, 2007.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The 20 S proteasome is an essential proteolytic particle, responsible for degrading short-lived and abnormal intracellular proteins. The 700-kDa assembly is comprised of 14 {alpha}-type and 14 beta-type subunits, which form a cylindrical architecture composed of four stacked heptameric rings ({alpha}7beta7beta7{alpha}7). The formation of the 20 S proteasome is a complex process that involves a cascade of folding, assembly, and processing events. To date, the understanding of the assembly pathway is incomplete due to the experimental challenges of capturing short-lived intermediates. In this study, we have applied a real-time mass spectrometry approach to capture transient species along the assembly pathway of the 20 S proteasome from Rhodococcus erythropolis. In the course of assembly, we observed formation of an early {alpha}/beta-heterodimer as well as an unprocessed half-proteasome particle. Formation of mature holoproteasomes occurred in concert with the disappearance of half-proteasomes. We also analyzed the beta-subunits before and during assembly and reveal that those with longer propeptides are incorporated into half- and full proteasomes more rapidly than those that are heavily truncated. To characterize the preholoproteasome, formed by docking of two unprocessed half-proteasomes and not observed during assembly of wild type subunits, we trapped this intermediate using a beta-subunit mutational variant. In summary, this study provides evidence for transient intermediates in the assembly pathway and reveals detailed insight into the cleavage sites of the propeptide.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The 20 S proteasome is a macromolecular assembly designed for the controlled proteolysis of short-lived regulatory proteins as well as abnormal and misfolded proteins (1, 2). The structure of this 700-kDa particle is highly conserved and can be found in eukaryotes, archaebacteria, and some eubacteria (3). It is composed of 28 subunits, arranged in a cylindrical architecture consisting of four heptameric rings: two outer {alpha}-type subunit rings embracing two central beta-type subunit rings ({alpha}7beta7beta7{alpha}7). The beta-subunits contain the active proteolytic sites. The main difference between the prokaryotic and eukaryotic 20 S proteasomes is that of complexity. Prokaryotic 20 S proteasomes (e.g. from Thermoplasma acidophilum (4, 5)) are generally composed of identical copies of 14 {alpha}-subunits and 14 beta-subunits; eukaryotic proteasomes recruit {alpha}- and beta-subunits from 14 different sub-families (6, 7). In mammals, complexity is enhanced further by three {gamma}-interferon inducible subunits, which are incorporated into the proteasome during the immune response (for a review, see Ref. 8). The bacterial proteasome from the actinomycetes Rhodococcus erythropolis is intermediate in complexity, consisting of two {alpha}-type and two beta-type subunits. Any of the four possible combinations of {alpha}- and beta-type subunits assembles to fully active proteasomes in vivo and in vitro (9).

beta-subunits of 20 S proteasomes from both eukaryotes and prokaryotes are expressed in a precursor form, with a propeptide sequence at the N terminus. Interestingly, the propeptides from different organisms are highly divergent and are thought to play different roles in proteasome assembly and activation (10, 11). During the course of assembly, they are post-translationally processed and removed (12). This autocatalytic mechanism exposes the catalytic nucleophile (i.e. the N-terminal threonine) and ensures that active sites are formed only after completion of the assembly process (13). In contrast to the short and often dispensable propeptides of the archaeal beta-type subunits (14-16), the Rhodococcus beta1- and beta2-subunits are translated as precursor proteins with relatively long propeptides of 65 and 59 residues, respectively. In the absence of these propeptides, the rate of formation of the proteasome complex is retarded (13). In general, the propeptide sequence of eubacteria comprises a region of about 15 amino acids near the center of the propeptide (Ser-42 to Pro-27), which exhibits significant conservation (17). Designated the "central box," this region is assumed to be important for propeptide function. Similarly, propeptides from eukaryotic beta-type subunits comprise more than 70 residues and have been shown to be essential for proteasome biogenesis and cell viability (18-20).

The relatively low complexity of archaeal 20 S proteasomes has allowed the first studies of assembly. When archaeal proteasomal {alpha}- and beta-subunits are co-expressed in Escherichia coli, mature and fully active 20 S proteasomes are formed (16, 21). In vitro studies of subunits individually produced demonstrate that the archaeal assembly appears to be conserved (12, 14, 15, 22) with the formation of seven-membered {alpha}-subunit rings providing a platform or template onto which the beta-sub-units are mounted (Fig. 1, pathway a). Nevertheless, it is note-worthy that there is no evidence for rings of {alpha}-subunits forming as intermediates in the in vivo assembly pathway of archaebacterial proteasomes. In contrast, in vitro assembly experiments of recombinant Rhodococcus proteasomes (9, 23) showed that individual {alpha}- and beta-subunits remain monomeric and inactive, whereas they spontaneously form active proteasomes when allowed to interact. Therefore, it is likely that the first intermediates in the assembly pathway are {alpha}/beta-subunit precursor heterodimers (Fig. 1, pathway b). However, this early intermediate species has not been identified experimentally. It is established, however, that the assembly proceeds via the formation of half-proteasomes composed of one {alpha}-subunit ring and one unprocessed beta-subunit ring ({alpha}7beta7). Two half-proteasomes assemble further to form a preholoproteasome, a species that still contains the unprocessed beta-subunits (13, 23, 24). Finally, processing of the beta-subunits occurs, and the mature holoproteasome ({alpha}7beta7beta7{alpha}7) is formed (9, 20). Recently, the study of mutational variants from Rhodococcus proteasomes revealed that the dimerization and self-processing of the beta-subunit precursors is accompanied by a conformational change of the beta-subunit and that this is needed for the correct coordination of the active site residue (25).


Figure 1
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 1.
Two possible assembly scenarios of the Rhodococcus 20 S proteasome. In archaea, yeast and mammalian proteasome assembly is initiated with the formation of a seven-{alpha}-subunit ring (pathway a). By contrast, it has been suggested that in the Rhodococcus proteasome assembly, an {alpha}/beta heterodimer is formed first (pathway b). Subsequently, in both cases, assembly proceeds through the formation of a half-proteasome. Two half-proteasomes then dimerize to form a preholoproteasomes. This intermediate most likely triggers both autocatalytic removal of propeptides and formation of active holoproteasomes.

 
The aim of the present study was to investigate the assembly pathway of the 20 S proteasome from Rhodococcus, using an approach not applied previously to the assembly of the proteasome, that of mass spectrometry (MS)7 of protein complexes in their native state (26, 27). We report here the in vitro assembly of {alpha}- and beta-subunits expressed separately, incubated together and monitored in real-time by MS. This approach enables time-dependent mass changes to be recorded directly by continuous sampling into the gas phase where the reaction is quenched. This method has been applied previously to smaller oligomeric complexes than the proteasome (28, 29). By recording mass spectra throughout the reaction time course, we were able to monitor the formation of an early assembly intermediate, namely the {alpha}/beta-heterodimer, the half-proteasomes, as well as mature 28-subunit 20 S proteasomes. In addition, we were able to determine in great detail the sites that are cleaved within the beta-subunit propeptides during the different assembly states. More generally, besides providing valuable insight into the assembly process, the results highlight the power of this method for structural biology and biogenesis studies of macro-molecular complexes in particular.


    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Plasmids and Mutagenesis—For reasons of simplicity and the availability of the crystal structure of a simplified {alpha}1beta120S proteasome from R. erythropolis (24), only one type of {alpha}-subunit and one type of beta-subunit was used for the in vitro and in vivo assembly experiments. The single gene constructs pT7-7 {alpha}1His6 and pT7-7 beta1His6 encoding the C-terminal His-tagged {alpha}- and beta-subunit, respectively, where used for the in vitro assembly experiments. For the in vivo assays, the bicistronic expression plasmid (pT7-7 beta1His6-{alpha}1) was used for recombinant co-expression of the genes encoding the {alpha}1- and the beta1-subunit (tagged with a C-terminal His6 tag) leading to active, mature proteasomes assembled in vivo. All plasmids were a kind gift of Dr. Frank Zühl.

The latter plasmid was also used as a template for site-directed mutagenesis experiments. The beta1His6-subunit residues Asp-173 and Asp-176 were mutated to alanines in the single gene construct using the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit from Stratagene. The experiments were performed according to the manufacturer's manual. The sequence of the mutant construct was verified by non-radioactive DNA sequencing.

Expression and Purification—Cells of the E. coli strain BL21 (DE3) (Stratagene) were transformed with the respective expression plasmid and grown in 6 liters LB medium to mid-log phase at 30 °C. After induction with a final concentration of 1 mM isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside for 5 h, cells were harvested and resuspended in sonication buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate, 50 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) containing a protease inhibitor mixture (Complete EDTA-free (Roche Applied Science) used according to the manufacturer's specifications), treated for 30 min on ice with lysozyme 1 mg/ml (Sigma) and a few grains of DNase I (Roche Applied Science), and sonicated for 15 min (Sonifier 250, Branson). The lysate was further fractionated first by a low speed spin (6000 x g, 15 min) followed by a high-speed spin (30, 000 x g, 30 min). The supernatant was filtered and directly loaded onto a 1-ml His-trap column (GE Healthcare), previously equilibrated with buffer A (20 mM sodium phosphate, 500 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, pH 7.4). Protein bound nonspecifically was removed with 10 column volumes of buffer A. Assembled proteasomes as well as single subunits were eluted with a gradient of 20-500 mM imidazole. Fractions were analyzed by 12% Schaegger SDS-PAGE and 4-20% Novex Tris-glycine native PAGE (Invitrogen). Fractions containing the designated proteins were pooled, concentrated, dialyzed against gel filtration buffer (20 mM Hepes, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5), and applied to a High Load 16/60 Superdex 200 (GE Healthcare) previously equilibrated with gel filtration buffer. Fractions were analyzed by 12% Schaegger SDS-PAGE and 4-20% Novex Tris-glycine native PAGE (Invitrogen). Those fractions containing 20 S proteasomes or the individual subunits were pooled, concentrated, and used for subsequent analysis.


Figure 2
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 2.
Biochemical analysis of the in vitro assembly process. A, Coomassie Blue-stained native PAGE of the time-dependence of in vitro assembly. Equimolar quantities of individually purified wild type {alpha}1- and beta1-subunits were incubated at 37 °C for 30 s (lane 1), 2 min (lane 2), 5 min (lane 3), 30 min (lane 4), 1 h (lane 5), 2 h (lane 6), or overnight (lane 7) and applied to PAGE analysis. The "high molecular weight calibration kit" for native electrophoresis (Amersham Biosciences) was used: tyroglobulin (669 kDa), ferrodoxin (440 kDa), catalase (232 kDa), aldolase (140 kDa), and bovine serum albumin (67 kDa) (M). B, proteolytic activity occurring during the in vitro assembly process is assayed by the time-dependent relative increase in fluorescence caused by the release of the fluorescent dye during hydrolysis of the Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-AMC. The reaction progress curve is referred to as {alpha}1+beta1 in vitro.Asa control, the reaction progress curve for the proteolytic activity of the in vivo assembled proteasome, referred to as ({alpha}1beta1 in vivo), was probed under the same conditions.

 
Native PAGE Analysis—4-20% Novex Tris-glycine native PAGE (Invitrogen) was used to probe the assembly state of in vitro assembled {alpha}- and beta-subunits. 1 nM of each individually purified subunit was mixed in a final total volume of 250 µl of the assay buffer (20 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5). The reaction mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 30 s, 2 min, 5 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, or overnight. Reactions were quenched by flash-freezing the samples in liquid nitrogen, and the samples were applied to the native PAGE system run at 4 °C. The in vivo assembled wild type proteasome and the individual purified subunits were used as controls.

Proteolysis Assay—The synthetic fluorogenic peptide Suc-LLVY-AMC (Bachem, Heidelberg, Germany), dissolved in Me2SO, was used as a substrate for measuring the proteolytic activity (13). Fluorescence intensity was measured by a FluoStar Optima spectrophotometer at a reaction temperature of 37 °C ± 0.5 °C. Either 200 pmol of beta-subunit or 14.3 pmol of in vivo assembled holoproteasomes was equilibrated with assay buffer (20 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5) in 96-well micro-titer plates at 37 °C. After about 10 min, 50 µl of 40 µM substrate solution (0.5% final concentration Me2SO) was added to the assay solution containing the individual beta-subunit and incubated for a further 10 min. The reaction was initiated by the addition of either 200 pmol of {alpha}-subunit to the beta-subunit/substrate solution or 50 µl of 40 µM substrate solution (0.5% final concentration of Me2SO) to the holoproteasome, resulting in equimolar amounts of either in vitro or in vivo assembled proteasomes and a final concentration of 10 µM Suc-LLVY-AMC in a total final volume of 200 µl. Fluorescence of the reaction mixture was assayed immediately. Reaction progress was monitored at 53-s intervals by measuring the relative fluorescence of each well using excitation and emission wavelengths of 320 and 460 nm, respectively. Each experiment was repeated at least three times.

Mass Spectrometry—Nanoflow electrospray ionization (ESI)-MS and tandem MS experiments were conducted on a high mass Q-TOF type instrument (30) adapted for a QSTAR XL platform (31). Conditions were carefully chosen to allow the ionization and detection of proteasome assemblies without disrupting non-covalent interactions. Prior to MS analysis, 0.3-0.6 mg/ml aliquots of {alpha}- and beta-subunits samples were concentrated 5-10 times and buffer-exchanged into 1 M ammonium acetate solution using Nanosep (Pall) columns. Subsequently, the concentrations of the {alpha}- and beta-subunit-containing solutions were determined by UV absorbance. The assembly reaction was analyzed at 4, 25, and 37 °C after mixing equimolar quantities of the {alpha}- and beta-subunits at various time intervals until the reaction was complete. The first time point was taken 2 min after incubating the two subunits.

Typically, aliquots of 2 µl of solution were electrosprayed from gold-coated borosilicate capillaries prepared in-house as described (32). The following experimental parameters were used: capillary voltage up to 1.2 kV, declustering potential 100-150 V, focusing potential 200-250 V, declustering potential two 15-55 V, and collision energy up to 130 V, MCP 2350 V. In tandem MS experiments, the relevant m/z value was isolated, and argon gas was admitted to the collision cell with an acceleration potential of up to 180 V. All spectra were calibrated externally by using a solution of cesium iodide (100 mg/ml). Spectra are shown here with minimal smoothing and without background subtraction.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Biochemical Analysis of the in Vitro Assembly—The formation of the fully assembled proteasome complex was monitored initially in a time-dependent manner by native PAGE analysis (Fig. 2A). The individual {alpha}1- and beta1-subunits give rise to bands corresponding to trimeric {alpha}1-subunits and individual beta1-subunits, which appear as more than one distinct band, indicating some proteolysis. Assembly was probed at several time points between 30 s and 16 h after introducing the {alpha}1- and beta1-subunits at 37 °C (Fig. 2A). Two bands appear initially, one in the molecular mass range of a half-proteasome (~440 kDa). The second band has a higher molecular mass (>669 kDa) and corresponds to the holoproteasome ({alpha}7beta7beta7{alpha}7). Despite the fact that aliquots of the assembly assay were flash-frozen, the only detectable intermediate by native PAGE is the half-proteasome. The appearance of fully assembled proteasomes is in accord with the disappearance of half-proteasomes, and depletion of the individual subunits is in agreement with previous results (13).


Figure 3
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 3.
Electrospray MS analysis of the monomeric {alpha}1-and beta1-subunits during the assembly reaction. A-C, mass spectra of the individual {alpha}1-subunit (A) and beta1-subunits (B) prior to assembly and 12 min after initiation of the assembly reaction at 37 °C (C). D, beta1-subunits dissociated from the half-proteasome during tandem MS 16 h after the start of the assembly reaction at 25 °C. Propeptide sequence of the beta1-subunit from the Rhodococcus 20 S proteasome. The central box region is highlighted in yellow (E).

 
To compare the activity of proteasomes assembled in this in vitro assembly reaction with those isolated after assembly in vivo, we used a fluorescence-based assay. We compared the rate of proteolysis of a fluorogenic peptide substrate during in vitro assembly with that of active, mature proteasomes assembled in vivo. Prior to cleavage of the peptide substrate, fluorescence is quenched, whereas upon proteolytic cleavage, an increase in fluorescence can be monitored. For in vivo assembled proteasomes, this proteolysis assay is characterized by a steep initial increase in fluorescence. The slope can be fitted to a first order kinetic whose saturation (at ~250 s) is due to substrate depletion (Fig. 2B). This demonstrates that there is no lag phase in the cleavage reaction under these conditions. Rather, cleavage is initiated immediately after the in vivo assembled proteasome is introduced to the peptide. By contrast, for the in vitro assembly reaction, in which individual {alpha}-subunits are introduced to beta-subunits together with the fluorogenic substrate, an initial lag phase is clearly observed. Moreover, activity is found to increase five times more slowly than for the corresponding reaction with in vivo assembled proteasomes. This shows that despite the assembly reaction producing high molecular weight species after ~120 s (Fig. 2A), activity is gained at a much slower rate, with saturation occurring after ~1400 s. This difference between assembly rate and activity can be explained by the requirement for processing of beta-subunits before full proteolytic function of the proteasome is achieved in vitro.

Monitoring the in Vitro Assembly by MS—Nanoflow ESI mass spectra were recorded for the individual subunits of the proteasome, the {alpha}1- and beta1-subunits, prior to carrying out the assembly reaction, Fig. 3. For the {alpha}1-subunit, only one major series of peaks is observed (Fig. 3A), with a measured mass consistent with that calculated for an {alpha}1-subunit without the first Met residue and including a C-terminal His6 (Table 1). Additional series of peaks are assigned to minor populations of {alpha}/{alpha}-homodimers and trimers, emphasizing the tendency of the {alpha}1-subunit to aggregate. This observation is in agreement with the native PAGE analysis of {alpha}1-subunits. In the spectrum recorded for the beta1-subunits (Fig. 3B), we could not identify full-length beta1-subunits (31,983 Da including the His6 tag). However, a set of 12 degradation products was assigned, corresponding to removal of the first 18, 22, 23, 25, 28, 29, 32, 36, 40, 42, 48, and 50 residues of the propeptide, denoted {Delta}18, {Delta}22, etc. (Table 1). The predominant degradation product is the {Delta}18 species. From the masses of these species, we can determine that all the cleavage sites in these degradation products are located within the propeptide sequence, residues Ser-48 to Thr-16 (Table 1, Fig. 3E).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1
Theoretical and measured masses of monomeric {alpha}1- and beta1-subunits and assembled complexes

 
To examine the assembly pathway in detail, we used MS, initially monitoring the reaction at 37 °C to enable comparison with results obtained by native gel analysis and the activity assay. Mass spectra were acquired at different time intervals after incubating equimolar ratios of the {alpha}1- and beta1-subunits. 12 min after initiating the reaction, a charge state series corresponding to an unprocessed half-proteasome is observed (Fig. 4A and Table 1). Subsequently, after 25 min, we observed spectra in which both half-proteasomes and intact holoproteasomes were present, demonstrating the co-existence of both species in solution. After 29 min, half-proteasomes could no longer be detected, only holoproteasomes, in accord with the data from the native gel analysis (Fig. 2A). Since no further changes in mass spectra were observed after this time, we conclude that the assembly reaction is complete. Interestingly, although the reaction was monitored at various time points until completion, we could not identify the predicted preholoproteasome species (13). We therefore repeated the same experiments at lower temperatures, 25 and 4 °C, in an attempt to capture this intermediate and to trap populations of the half-proteasome. However, although at 25 °C we were able to trap half-proteasomes for further study, preholoproteasomes were not detected. Also, to our surprise, at these temperatures (4 and 25 °C), assembly was not complete. Even after 5 days, unprocessed half-proteasome particles persist at 25 °C (Fig. 4B). This observation indicates that the assembly processes is temperature-dependent.

If we now turn our attention to the low m/z region of the spectra recorded during assembly, we can monitor the proportions of the {alpha}1- and beta1-subunits that remain in solution during the progression of the reaction. Simultaneously, with the formation of unprocessed half-proteasome and holoproteasome, the intensity of the monomeric subunits was found to decrease. A set of seven beta1-subunits remained in solution 12 min after the assembly reaction was initiated at 37 °C (Fig. 3C). This subset of seven corresponds to those peptides with the shortest propeptide (from {Delta}25 to {Delta}42), implying that the beta1-subunits with the longest propeptides identified prior to assembly (Fig. 3B), namely {Delta}18, {Delta}22, and {Delta}23, are either promptly integrated within the assembling proteasome or rapidly degraded. Both {alpha}1-subunits and truncated beta1-subunits could still be detected even after the assembly reaction was complete. We attribute this observation to properties of the beta1-subunits. Specifically, we anticipate that extensive truncations may perturb the native state of the beta1-subunits, and consequently, preclude their successful incorporation into the holoproteasome.

To confirm the incorporation of beta-subunits with the longest propeptides within the assembled form of the half-proteasome, ions of this complex at m/z 9000 were isolated and subjected to a tandem MS experiment. This process results in the expulsion of individual beta-subunits and the formation of a "stripped" half-proteasome complex ({alpha}7beta6) (25). Surprisingly, a set of 10 beta-subunits was identified and cleaved within the propeptide region to different extents ({Delta}18, {Delta}25, {Delta}28, {Delta}29, {Delta}32, {Delta}36, {Delta}40, {Delta}42, {Delta}48, and {Delta}50) (Table 1 and Fig. 3D). This group of beta-subunits contains a range of truncated forms from {Delta}18 to {Delta}50 and is very similar to the set of monomeric beta-subunits identified prior to assembly (Fig. 3B). The major difference is in the intensity ratio of the individual species. Specifically, prior to assembly, the {Delta}25 species was predominant, whereas after assembly, the {Delta}50 species gave the highest intensity peaks. Consequently, we have found that the beta-subunits expelled from the half-proteasome have undergone more extensive processing to form shorter propeptide sequences than the beta-subunits prior to assembly.

A close inspection of the mass spectra recorded while monitoring the assembly, in the range of 3000-3700 m/z at all three temperatures (4, 25, and 37 °C) (Table 1 and Fig. 5), identified the appearance of two additional species. The predominant species is consistent with the {alpha}/{alpha}-homodimers, emphasizing the tendency of the {alpha}-subunit to aggregate as observed in the native gel and mass spectra (Figs. 2A and 3A). Interestingly, all other species correspond to {alpha}/beta-heterodimers in which the first 25, 28, 29, 32, and 40 residues of the beta1-subunit propeptide are truncated. This set of {alpha}/beta-heterodimers corresponds closely to the monomeric beta1-subunits that were not incorporated during the assembly of the half-proteasome and holoproteasome (Fig. 3C). A possible explanation for this observation is that the reduced activity of these beta1-subunits results in their becoming trapped within the {alpha}/beta-heterodimers, which are not able to assemble into the full proteasome.

Mass Spectrometry Analysis of the in Vivo Assembled D173A,D176A Mutant—The formation of a wild type preholoproteasome in which propeptides are retained could not be detected in our real-time MS experiments, although this intermediate must form prior to the active proteasome particle. Therefore, a mutant of the Rhodococcus proteasome, altered in its ability to assemble, was used to characterize this late-assembly intermediate. Previously, we have reported that the beta1-subunit mutational variant, D173A,D176A, expressed recombinantly in E. coli by using a bicistronic expression system, is trapped at the preholoproteasome stage (25). The mass spectrum recorded for this mutant indicates that the major charge state series corresponds in mass to preholoproteasomes, whereas the minor charge state is assigned to half-proteasomes (Fig. 6, A and B).


Figure 4
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 4.
Real-time monitoring of the assembly pathway. ESI-MS spectra were taken after different time intervals at 37 (A) and 25 °C (B). At both temperatures, half-proteasomes with propeptides attached are formed initially. However, at 37 °C after 29 min, all the half-proteasome species have assembled into intact processed proteasomes. An intermediate step in which both unprocessed half-proteasomes and intact proteasomes co-exist is observed after 25 min (37 °C). By contrast, at 25 °C, half-proteasomes persist even after 5 days of assembly.

 


Figure 5
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 5.
Mass spectrum of various dimers formed during the assembly reaction. Shown is a spectrum recorded 12 min after starting the assembly reaction at 37 °C. The same spectrum is shown in Fig. 3C but at a lower m/z range. The charge states of dimers, labeled with stars, are indicated. Charge states of the monomers are given alongside their labels (circles).

 
To examine in detail the composition of this late assembly intermediate, preholoproteasomes formed using the D173A, D176A mutant were subjected to in-source dissociation (Fig. 6C). Under these conditions of higher acceleration, series of charge states are observed at higher m/z values than the preholoproteasome. Two of these series are assigned to "stripped complexes" that have lost one or two {alpha}1-subunits (Table 1). At low m/z values, only {alpha}1-subunits are dissociated from the proteasome, consistent with the architecture in which the two {alpha}7-ring structures are exposed and in accord with previous analyses of 20 S proteasomes (31, 33, 34). Expansion of the peaks assigned to the stripped complexes, minus {alpha}1-subunits or minus two {alpha}1-subunits, reveals fine splitting, indicating the incorporation of various truncated forms of either the {alpha}1-subunits or the beta1-subunits (Fig. 6, D and E). We could exclude the possibility that the {alpha}1-subunits are cleaved as their mass measured from the low m/z region is consistent with the theoretical mass. We therefore conclude that the beta1-subunits are truncated. By measuring the mass of the stripped complexes, we could identify the statistical incorporation of the various beta1-subunits (Table 1). The spectra reveal that the intact preholoproteasome is composed of a minimum of 10 full-length beta1-subunits. Up to four of the beta1-subunits in any intact preholoproteasome, however, correspond to truncated beta1-subunits ({Delta}18). The fact that similar ratios of truncated subunits are observed within both stripped complexes implies that truncated subunits are not stripped preferentially. In summary, we have demonstrated that the in vivo assembled preholoproteasome contains predominantly full-length beta1-subunits but that four of the 14 beta1-subunits correspond to truncated forms ({Delta}18).


Figure 6
View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 6.
Analysis of the preholoproteasome. A, nanoflow ES of the D173A,D176A mutant. The dominant charge state distribution corresponds to a fully assembled proteasome {alpha}14b14, whereas the low abundant charge series in the 7900-8900 m/z region corresponds to a half-proteasome complex, {alpha}7beta7. Both species contain full-length beta-subunits (betapro) and partially degraded propeptides (beta{Delta}18). Inset B, an expansion of the half-proteasome particle. C, in source dissociation, mass spectra of the intact holoproteasome result in stripping of one and two {alpha}-subunits. The broad charge state distribution also corresponds to the intact holoproteasome that has undergone extensive charge stripping (39). The first {alpha}-subunit dissociation step ({alpha}13b14) is expanded in D, and the region corresponding to the second dissociation step ({alpha}12beta14) is expanded in inset E. Different stoichiometries of the full-length and partly degraded propeptide ({Delta}18) are labeled.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In this study, we have followed the assembly of the {alpha}1- and beta1-subunits from R. erythropolis into the 20 S proteasome, using real-time MS. We were able to capture a transient intermediate along the in vitro reaction pathway, demonstrating that this early assembly intermediate is an {alpha}/beta-heterodimer. Such a heterodimer was predicted to exist (13); however, it has not been observed experimentally. Despite the high similarity in mass of the {alpha}/beta-heterodimer and the {alpha}/{alpha}-homodimer, which prevents their distinction using biochemical methods, the high resolution of MS with the rapid time frame for recording spectra enabled the identification of this species. In the course of assembly, we could also follow the formation of unprocessed half-proteasomes and the gradual appearance of fully assembled holoproteasomes. This MS approach also allowed us to study in great detail the composition of the beta-subunit propeptide during different stages of assembly. Interestingly, we could not detect preholoproteasomes that form from the docking of two unprocessed half-proteasomes during the in vitro assembly reaction. To investigate the composition of this late assembly intermediate, we used a mutational variant assembled in vivo. Overall, therefore, in this study, we were able to reveal the formation of both early and late intermediates and to demonstrate differential incorporation of truncated beta-subunits within various stages of the assembly.

The observation that the first assembly intermediate for the Rhodococcus 20 S proteasomes is an {alpha}/beta-heterodimer is in contrast to that found for assembly of the Thermoplasma proteasome. The latter study showed that {alpha}-subunits spontaneously assemble into seven-membered rings when they are expressed alone in E. coli (16). Detailed comparison between the structures of proteasomes from Rhodococcus and Thermoplasma, however, suggests that there are fewer specific interactions and smaller contact areas between the {alpha}-subunits in the Rhodococcus proteasome (24). This may explain why extensive {alpha}-subunit interactions are observed in Thermoplasma but not in Rhodococcus. However, it remains to be established whether or not {alpha}-rings are assembly intermediates in vivo. This will depend upon the kinetics of the formation of the {alpha}/{alpha} homodimer versus that of the {alpha}/beta heterodimer (35). If the formation of {alpha}/beta heterodimers is much faster than assembly of {alpha}-rings, the assembly process of archeabacterial proteasomes would be expected to be similar to those of the eubacterial system studied here.

The preholoproteasome intermediate that forms from the dimerization of two half-proteasomes was not observed in our experiments, even at the lower temperatures. A previous study suggested that the conversion of preholoproteasomes into mature holoproteasomes is the rate-limiting step of the assembly process (13). However, the fact that this assembly intermediate was not detected in our analyses indicates that it is short-lived. A similar conclusion was reported in a study that used electron microscopy to characterize late events in the Rhodococcus proteasome assembly (23). In an attempt to characterize further this intermediate, we analyzed a beta1-subunit mutational variant. Using this mutant, we found that the preholoproteasome consists primarily of the full-length beta1-subunit but that up to four of these beta1-subunits are substituted by truncated beta1-subunits ({Delta}18) (Fig. 6). This result demonstrates that the first 18 residues of the beta1-subunit propeptide are not necessary for docking of two half-proteasomes.

Our results also demonstrate that the assembly process is temperature-dependent. Interestingly, however, assembly of the half-proteasome occurs at similar rates, even at the lower temperatures, whereas final docking of the two half-proteasomes is significantly retarded at the lower temperatures. To explain this observation, we assume that some structural perturbation within the individual beta1-subunits is necessary for assembly to the full proteasome. More generally, it is established that protein-protein interfaces in obligate complexes, such as the proteasome, in which the monomers do not form stable structures in vivo, are generally more hydrophobic than non-obligate associations (36, 37). It may be speculated, therefore, that at the relevant physiological temperature, hydrophobic stretches are exposed. The accessibility of these hydrophobic regions may well be necessary for docking of the two half-proteasomes, explaining the favorable reaction at 37 °C and the hindered assembly at lower temperatures.

Detailed analysis of spectra of the beta1-subunits has allowed us to gain insight into the mechanism of autocatalytic removal of the propeptide and its role in assembly. Previous observations suggested that the propeptide is degraded in a processive manner by undergoing multiple cleavages. In this study, we were able to identify clearly specific cleavage sites. In an attempt to find a common property of these 12 cleavage sites, we have examined in detail the location and relative abundance of the various degradation products (Fig. 7). A common feature of these residues is that they are all on the exposed face of the complex, which might explain the mechanism of their degradation. It is also noteworthy that 10 of the residues are polar, with the exception of Leu-43 and Gly-34, both of which are flanked by polar amino acids. This could also imply that in addition to exposed residues, processive degradation targets polar residues. Moreover, although the propeptide contains only one defined structural element, an {alpha}-helix positioned between Gly-34 and Asp-38, the cleavage sites are distributed both within and outside of this {alpha}-helix. We propose, therefore, that polarity and accessibility may well be important factors in determining favorable cleavage sites within the propeptide.

It is interesting to consider how the extent of cleavage affects the incorporation of truncated subunits into the intact proteasome and various assembly intermediates. The x-ray structure of a processing-incompetent Rhodococcus proteasome indicated the importance of the central box region (Ser-42 to Pro-27) to assembly (24) (Fig. 3E). Within this region, there are two highly conserved serine residues, Ser-42 and Ser-41, which form hydrogen bonds to Arg-85 of the {alpha}-subunit and Arg-82 of the beta1-subunit, respectively. These interactions position a short proceeding {alpha}-helix (Gly-34 to Asp-38) and allow docking of the N-terminal end of the propeptide linking the beta-subunit to two adjacent {alpha}-subunit. In accord with this structural information, our results indicate that once residues within the central box region are degraded, assembly is much slower or even abolished. We found heavily truncated subunits undergoing multiple cleavage (18, 23, 38) trapped within {alpha}/beta heterodimers or remaining monomeric at the end of the assembly reaction. Overall, it seems that longer propeptide sequences increase {alpha}/beta-interfaces. This, in turn, promotes efficient assembly.


Figure 7
View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIGURE 7.
Multiple cleavage sites of the beta-subunit propeptide. A and B, histograms showing the relative populations (in percentage) of the different degradation products of the beta1-subunit before assembly (A) and 12 min after starting the assembly at 37 °C (B). The percentages were calculated from intensities of the peaks in the spectra shown in Fig. 3, B and C, respectively. C, structural view of the propeptide degradation sites. The {alpha}-subunits are colored blue, the beta-subunit are colored green, and the propeptide is colored gray. Residues C-terminal to the cleavage site are highlighted and color-coded from red to yellow according to their relative intensity before assembly. Red, above 8%; orange, between 5 and 8%; light orange, between 2 and 4%; yellow, 1%. The structure is produced from the Protein Data Bank coordinates 1Q5R of a half-proteasome of the K33A mutant (24) by using the program PyMol. Within the propeptide region, no traceable electron density is observed for residues Gly-7 to Ile-23 of the propeptide.

 
The observation that even the heavily truncated species ({Delta}50, -{Delta}48, {Delta}42) were incorporated into the half-proteasome was surprising (Fig. 3D). The fact that these truncated variants were not incorporated into the full proteasome, however, implies that these mutations affect the correct docking of the two half-proteasomes. In addition, it is noticeable that the degree of propeptide degradation is different between in vivo and in vitro assemblies. Although all the intermediates analyzed here for the in vivo assembly are degraded up to the first 18 residues (C-terminus to Ser-48) (Fig. 6 and Ref. 25), in vitro, the propeptide is more heavily truncated, and degradation can proceed up to the first 50 residues (C-terminus to Thr-16). This observation may imply that in vivo the {alpha}- and beta-subunits are expressed, folded, and assembled in concert, thus preventing substantial degradation of the propeptide.

In summary, the study presented here reveals many of the different steps along the assembly pathway of the 20 S proteasome. The unique ability of MS to identify in great detail the modifications of individual beta-subunits, differing by only one residue, has enabled us to monitor those that are trapped within the various intermediate states. We are therefore able to identify specific cleavage sites along the propeptide and to demonstrate that in vivo, the propeptide is significantly more protected from degradation than in vitro. More generally, this study highlights the tremendous potential for using real-time mass spectral acquisition and the phase transition from solution to gas phase to capture transient intermediates along assembly pathways of macromolecular complexes.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Back

{diamondsuit} This article was selected as a Paper of the Week. Back

1 Supported by the European Molecular Biology Organization, the Wingate Scholarship, and the Royal Society. Back

2 Both authors contributed equally to this work. Back

3 Supported by the Sonderforschungsbereich Grant SFB 594. Back

4 Present address: GSF-Institute of Molecular Immunology, Marchioninistr. 25, D-81377 Munich, Germany. Back

5 To whom correspondence may be addressed. baumeist{at}biochem.mpg.de.

6 Supported by Walters-Kundert trust and Royal Society. To whom correspondence may be addressed. cvr24{at}cam.ac.uk.

7 The abbreviations used are: MS, mass spectrometry; Suc, succinyl; AMC, amido-4-methylcoumarin. Back



    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Coux, O., Tanaka, K., and Goldberg, A. L. (1996) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65, 801-847[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Voges, D., Zwickl, P., and Baumeister, W. (1999) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 1015-1068[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Gerards, W. L., de Jong, W. W., Boelens, W., and Bloemendal, H. (1998) CMLS Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 54, 253-262[CrossRef]
  4. Dahlmann, B., Kopp, F., Kuehn, L., Niedel, B., Pfeifer, G., Hegerl, R., and Baumeister, W. (1989) FEBS Lett. 251, 125-131[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Zwickl, P., Lottspeich, F., and Baumeister, W. (1992) FEBS Lett. 312, 157-160[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Unno, M., Mizushima, T., Morimoto, Y., Tomisugi, Y., Tanaka, K., Yasuoka, N., and Tsukihara, T. (2002) Structure (Camb.) 10, 609-618[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Groll, M., Ditzel, L., Lowe, J., Stock, D., Bochtler, M., Bartunik, H. D., and Huber, R. (1997) Nature 386, 463-471[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Rock, K. L., and Goldberg, A. L. (1999) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 17, 739-779[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Zuhl, F., Tamura, T., Dolenc, I., Cejka, Z., Nagy, I., De Mot, R., and Baumeister, W. (1997) FEBS Lett. 400, 83-90[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Kruger, E., Kloetzel, P. M., and Enenkel, C. (2001) Biochimie (Paris) 83, 289-293
  11. Seemuller, E., Zwickl, P., and Baumeister, W. (2001) in The Enzymes, Vol. XXII, 3rd Ed., pp. 335-371, Academic Press, Orlando, FL
  12. Seemuller, E., Lupas, A., and Baumeister, W. (1996) Nature 382, 468-471[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Zuhl, F., Seemuller, E., Golbik, R., and Baumeister, W. (1997) FEBS Lett. 418, 189-194[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Wilson, H. L., Ou, M. S., Aldrich, H. C., and Maupin-Furlow, J. (2000) J. Bacteriol. 182, 1680-1692[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Maupin-Furlow, J. A., Aldrich, H. C., and Ferry, J. G. (1998) J. Bacteriol. 180, 1480-1487[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Zwickl, P., Kleinz, J., and Baumeister, W. (1994) Nat. Struct. Biol. 1, 765-770[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Nagy, I., Tamura, T., Vanderleyden, J., Baumeister, W., and De Mot, R. (1998) J. Bacteriol. 180, 5448-5453[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Schmidtke, G., Kraft, R., Kostka, S., Henklein, P., Frommel, C., Lowe, J., Huber, R., Kloetzel, P. M., and Schmidt, M. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 6887-6898[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Heinemeyer, W., Fischer, M., Krimmer, T., Stachon, U., and Wolf, D. H. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 25200-25209[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Chen, P., and Hochstrasser, M. (1996) Cell 86, 961-972[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Groll, M., Brandstetter, H., Bartunik, H., Bourenkow, G., and Huber, R. (2003) J. Mol. Biol. 327, 75-83[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Grziwa, A., Maack, S., Puhler, G., Wiegand, G., Baumeister, W., and Jaenicke, R. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 223, 1061-1067[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Mayr, J., Seemuller, E., Muller, S. A., Engel, A., and Baumeister, W. (1998) J. Struct. Biol. 124, 179-188[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Kwon, Y. D., Nagy, I., Adams, P. D., Baumeister, W., and Jap, B. K. (2004) J. Mol. Biol. 335, 233-245[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Witt, S., Kwon, Y. D., Sharon, M., Felderer, K., Beuttler, M., Robinson, C. V., Baumeister, W., and Jap, B. K. (2006) Structure (Camb.) 14, 1179-1188[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. van den Heuvel, R. H., and Heck, A. J. (2004) Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 8, 519-526[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Benesch, J. L., and Robinson, C. V. (2006) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 16, 245-251[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Fandrich, M., Tito, M. A., Leroux, M. R., Rostom, A. A., Hartl, F. U., Dobson, C. M., and Robinson, C. V. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 14151-14155[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Remaut, H., Rose, R. J., Hannan, T. J., Hultgren, S. J., Radford, S. E., Ashcroft, A. E., and Waksman, G. (2006) Mol. Cell 22, 831-842[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Sobott, F., Hernandez, H., McCammon, M. G., Tito, M. A., and Robinson, C. V. (2002) Anal. Chem. 74, 1402-1407[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Chernushevich, I. V., and Thomson, B. A. (2004) Anal. Chem. 76, 1754-1760[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Hernandez, H., and Robinson, C. V. (2007) Nat. Protocols 2, 715-726[CrossRef]
  33. Sharon, M., Witt, S., Felderer, K., Rockel, B., Baumeister, W., and Robinson, C. V. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281, 9569-9575[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Loo, J. A., Berhane, B., Kaddis, C. S., Wooding, K. M., Xie, Y., Kaufman, S. L., and Chernushevich, I. V. (2005) J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 16, 998-1008[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Heinemeyer, W., Ramos, P. C., and Dohmen, R. J. (2004) CMLS Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 61, 1562-1578
  36. Lo Conte, L., Chothia, C., and Janin, J. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 285, 2177-2198[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Jones, S., and Thornton, J. M. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 13-20[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Akopian, T. N., Kisselev, A. F., and Goldberg, A. L. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 1791-1798[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Sobott, F., McCammon, M. G., and Robinson, C. V. (2003) Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 230, 193-200[CrossRef]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Protein Sci.